Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
05.20.2008 4:48 pm

Steelman checkgate leads to Missouri Baptist Home donation

A conflict over whether Republican gubernatorial candidate Sarah Steelman ever received a check from a pro-stem-cell group has turned into a political blogging brouhaha. The winner, in the end, will be the Missouri Baptist Home.

Here’s what happened. Yesterday at the competing news conferences between Steelman and U.S. Rep. Kenny Hulshof, Steelman was asked about receiving campaign donations from a pro-stem-cell research group, Supporters of Health Research and Treatments. Steelman said she didn’t know anything about the check, and spokesman Spence Jackson told KY3’s David Catanese that the campaign never received such a check.

Then Chad Livengood reported on his News-Leader blog that the check had indeed been received and cashed.

Why does this matter? Because Steelman and Hulshof are engaged in a primary race to the right, and both are proclaiming their opposition to embryonic stem cell research. So both campaigns went into high gear.

Hulshof’s campaign sent out a release blasting Steelman for “disappointing conduct unbecoming of a governor,” making reference to the conflicting statements on the check and previous conflicting statements on the vacation of Deputy Treasurer Doug Gaston, who was working on the Steelman campaign while being paid by the state.

Now Jackson has called to say that they found the information. Indeed, the check was cashed, along with two others that were never reported. One from the Greater Kansas City Chamber of Commerce PAC for $1,275 and one from F&C Bank. (I asked Jackson if it was possible the second check, for $250, came from T&C Bank, of which Steelman’s husband is on the board. He said no.)

Those checks will show up on an amended report, Jackson says. The check from the pro-stem-cell group will also show up, but the Steelman campaign will make a donation in the same amount, $1,275, to the Missouri Baptist Home. Jackson said the campaign did not talk to the pro-stem-cell group about returning the money.

“We haven’t talked to them,” he said.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
2 comments

Comments are closed.

Wow. Two candidates arguing over who is more oppossed to stem cells in a state that passed amendment two and elected Claire who was vocally pro stem cell research. Good luck to them!

— Richard
10:08 am May 21st, 2008

It’s cracking me up that people like Richard want to continue to pigeon-hole republicans as being anti-stem cell research.

The ONLY stem cell research that people have openly opposed has to do with EMBRYONIC stem cell research, obtained from fetuses! The method of obtaining such stem cells is inhumane, at best, and they have offered little or no hope of becoming helpful, as opposed to stem cells obtained from umbilical cords, or even adult stem cells.

Other than embryonic stem cells, other forms of stem cell research have been welcomed.

— Jim (the republican)
10:23 am May 21st, 2008