Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
06.03.2008 6:04 pm

Email war continues between Blunt and Nixon

Today saw a flurry of fracases in the longstanding e-mail fight between Gov. Matt Blunt and Attorney General Jay Nixon.

When we left the duo a few weeks ago, Nixon’s staff was sending over copies of thousands of office e-mails to comply with Blunt’s record request.

Today, Blunt’s staff contended that the documents “showed that Nixon had no specific e-mail retention policy of his own.  Nixon only implemented a specific e-mail retention policy on January 1, 2008, months after he launched political attacks against the governor’s office on the issue, more than a month after he appointed political operatives to attack the governor’s office on e-mail retention and 15 years after he became Attorney General.”

The Missouri GOP soon followed with a similar missive.

 As regulars know, Nixon appointed in November the investigative team that has attempted to probe the handling of e-mails in the governor’s office. The team was set up, in part, in response to a former Blunt lawyer who contends that he was fired for raising concerns that the governor’s staff was failing to properly retain e-mails in order to avoid complying with open-records requests. The lawyer, Scott Eckersley, has since filed suit.

The investigative team  filed suit in May, accusing the governor’s office of failing to turn out copies of e-mails and backup tapes sought by the team.

The team also alleged in the suit, according to our story, that “Blunt’s top aides ordered state employees to break the law by destroying copies of government e-mails so they wouldn’t ever become public…”

Today, Nixon granted the investigative another extension – until Aug. 29 – to complete its probe. The team had been slated to end its work and file a report on Friday; it says it can’t do so because of the suit.

This afternoon, Nixon spokesman Scott Holste blasted the latest attack from Blunt and Mo GOP, which he said “illustrates that they don’t understand the role of the state records commission.”

Holste said that Nixon’s office has sent over to Blunt’s staff, several times, copies of the state record-retention schedule for Nixon’s office. That schedule has been followed since Nixon took office in 1993, Holste said.

He cited a supplemental retention policy put in place for Nixon’s office in 1994.

What was sent out on Jan. 1, Holste said, was “a document management policy. It is not a retention policy. We’ve always followed the records retention policy” set by the state commission for the attorney general’s office.

4 comments

Comments are closed.

Baby Blunt-how irrelevant. Is this all he does now in his position of governor of the state of Missouri? Only a few more months…

— slu'09
1:58 pm June 4th, 2008

> Today, Nixon granted the investigative another extension – until
> Aug. 29 – to complete its probe.

Nixon will continue to grant them extensions right up until the November election. That’s because this entire show is simply a use of the power and resources of the attorney general’s office for the political benefit of Mr. Nixon. Just like the Missouri Foundation for Health. The dirty politics and misuse of office that characterize Mr. Nixon remind me of another politician who shares his surname.

— Nick Kasoff
2:05 pm June 4th, 2008

How much are we going to have to take before Blunt mans up and complies with his side of the requests?! Seems like Nixon has humored Blunt’s “diversional” record request long enough. Need Blunt forget a request made of him and his office some nine months ago?! And if Nixon, as attorney general, lacks the authority to enforce the law in the governor’s office, then who in the world can?! I couldn’t be more sick and tired of the immature sidestepping Blunt has seemed to perfected this last year. Sudden interest in Nixon’s email policy, …’s records, and accusations of political motivation, are simply a few of the riduculous, hypocritical tactics to stall the innevitable consequences Blunt and his administration brought upon themselves when they fired Eckersley and falsely smeared his character in effort to cover up their own crooked practices. Sensing a pattern?! –Hey Nick–if you wanna talk about the “misuse of power and resources of an office for politial benefit,” start with Blunt and the GOP–if common sense and integrity are on your side, you shouldn’t have to dig too deep.

— trip
9:43 pm June 4th, 2008