Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
06.26.2008 11:00 am

Hulshof makes Second Injury Fund a campaign issue

When Kenny Hulshof and Sarah Steelman appeared at a gubernatorial debate at Lake of the Ozarks last week, Hulshof appeared to be reading from the Matt Blunt/Gary Nodler/Steve Hunter script on Second Injury Fund.

The congressman said that the fund is near insolvency and that he intended to do something about it. Treasurer Steelman responded with a fact that House Republicans also heard during hearings this legislative session: the actual balance of the fund is much healthier than any of the actuaries have predicted.

In fact, the balance of the SIF as of yesterday is $21,507,148.79.

In a news release yesterday, Hulshof continued the attack and suggested that Steelman has been AWOL from the debate regarding SIF.

Hulshof cites a PricewaterhouseCoopers study that suggests the SIF will be insolvent by sometime in 2009. Of all the studies put forth on the SIF, most parties, from the attorney general’s office to the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations office, seem to agree that the PricewaterhouseCoopers study is the most accurate one available.

That study, however, says that the fund, as run by the treasurer’s office and the AG’s office, is managed well. It also suggests that lowering the amount the treasurer and AG can settle cases for in a lump sum, is a bad idea.

Hulshof, however, is adopting the position that was popular among Republican House members. Baker says Hulshof supports lowering the amount the state can settle SIF cases for from $60,000 to $40,000.

The PricewaterhouseCoopers study says that the problem with SIF is the cap on revenue going into the fund passed by House Republicans in 2005 as part of SB1. If the cap isn’t lifted, the study says, the fund will go insolvent.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
5 comments

Comments are closed.

hulshof…

another blunt.

want 4 more years of ‘blunt’ tactics on our state…

more unemployment, more people losing health care insurance, more favors to big business, more ‘misery in mizzouree’…

then vote for ‘little kenny boy’ hulshof

— llbean
11:39 am June 26th, 2008

If there’s a position that only benefits the Chamber of Commerce and shafts working people in Missouri, you can bet that’s where Hulshof will be. Hulshof is a money-grubbing snot nosed corporatist like Blunt.

— Tim Hogan
3:39 pm June 26th, 2008

I guess that Kenny doesn’t understand the “nuances” of how a real government fund runs. You know , in balance, without soaring deficits or the ability to keep borrowing or printing money. Sarah is a bean counter and Kenny loves to spend, spend, spend.

— George Hamilton
10:39 am June 27th, 2008

No where in the PricewaterhouseCoopers study did it say the “problem” with SIF is the cap. The study stated the cap limits revenue coming into the fund, and current revenues are not adequate to meet payouts. This leaves us with the proverbial quandary, is the problem that we don’t have enough money? Or is the problem that we aren’t spending the money we have wisely? Many who make a living by suing others, and many in the media seem to overlook the issue of whether money is spent wisely. Instead, they say we don’t have enough money. Considering Missouri’s SIF has some of the most liberal benefits of all fifty states, and nearly half of the states have done away with SIF’s, why not consider that Missouri’s SIF may not be the most effectively managed program? I would certainly love to live in a society where, when I don’t have enough money to pay my bills, I just go get some more. Such is the tale of the Second Injury Fund.

— Jim Kistler
10:41 am June 27th, 2008

Hulshof has some nerve to talk about ethics while he’s holding hands with Tom DeLay’s defender-in-chief Roy Blunt. Kenny really has drank the Kool Aid out there in Washington and is good at talking out of both sides of his mouth.

The voters will see through this hypocrisy.

— Steve
1:04 pm June 27th, 2008