Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
06.20.2008 10:58 am

Missouri unemployment rate tops 6 percent

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

It’s not surprising that when the economic news is bad, no news releases are forthcoming from the governor’s office. So it’s possible that you haven’t yet read that preliminary numbers from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, released last week, show that May’s unemployment rate in Missouri was the worse it’s been since Gov. Matt Blunt took office.

May’s preliminary unemployment rate topped 6 percent for Missouri, the first time the number has been above 6 percent since the first month of Blunt’s term as governor. Actually, according to the numbers reported by BLS at the time, the state’s unemployment rate hasn’t been at 6 percent in more than a decade.

But the BLS has gone back and refigured rates for the years from 2003 to 2007, and based on those new rates, unemployment was last at 6 percent in January of 2005.

Either way, 6 percent unemployment is a sign of the economic troubles the state is currently experiencing.

5 comments

Comments are closed.

Tony,

BLS just released the numbers this morning, but Blunt’s folks have had access for over a week since they are calculated by the Dept. of Economic Development before being sent up to the feds. If you check Blunt’s press release dates and cross reference with BLS release dates on months there is (was) remotely good news, Blunt’s office didn’t hesitate to release whatever they wanted to. You might note this hasn’t happened in a while now.

The Blunt administration’s selective use and release of economic figures is simply appalling. Even DED and MERIC can no longer be trusted to consistently release figures. I hope whoever takes over for Blunt in ‘09 can end the political manipulation of even the most basic of economic estimates!

— Nick
11:07 am June 20th, 2008

Way to take pleasure in the misery of the state, just so you can take a shot a the Governor. The nation is having problems yet you somehow try and connect it still tot he Blunt Admin. I know you are only part-time at the Post, I guess you spend the rest of the time consulting on the Nixon campaign…

— Purple Leader
11:16 am June 20th, 2008

Well wasn’t it Blunt who wanted to take all credit for the decreases in unemployment last year. It only seems fitting that he also take all credit for the increases as well!

Tony - thanks for bringing us the news that so many other reporters seem to miss entirely!

— Curt Z.
11:47 am June 20th, 2008

Bottom line is that a governor deserves neither the credit for a good economic time or the blame for a poor economic time. I don’t blame Bob Holden for 2000-2004. He was dealt a bad hand and he helped make it worse. Blunt is currently experiencing the same thing. If McCaskill or Holden were governor right this minute, the news would be the exact same.

— Amazedbythelunacy
2:20 pm June 20th, 2008

Two words…. minimum wage.

Fuel costs rise - use less. Labor costs rise - use less. Looks like the government worshipers need to create some more public sector jobs that aren’t affected by economic rules.

— Bb
2:45 pm June 20th, 2008