Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
06.26.2008 5:04 pm

Obama camp calls Mo a prime takeover target

David Plouffe, the national campaign manager for presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama, singled out Missouri in a conference call Thursday as one of a dozen or so states that went Republican in 2004 and the Obama camp believes he can carry in November.

As a result, the campaign is sending in some of its strongest field staff members, he said.

“We believe it’s a very competitive state,” Plouffe said, referring to Missouri.  He noted that Obama wins the White House if he simply adds Missouri and Iowa to his column, while retaining all the states won by losing 2004 Democratic nominee John Kerry.

Later, Plouffe explained that Missouri voters are seen as receptive to the Democratic message because they are “very unhappy about the economy” and “the way Washington works.”

Rural Missouri also is suffering “real economic hardship,” he added.

Couple all that with “optimal Democratic  turnout” in Missouri’s Democratic strongholds (largely urban territory) and that could spell a victory, Plouffe added.

“It’ll be close,” he said.

The spokesman for the presumptive GOP nominee, John McCain, replied that their camp agrees with Plouffe’s general assessment of the Missouri public’s discontent and the closeness of the contest between the candidates.

But in the end, McCain spokesman Jeff Sadosky said, Missouri voters will choose between two candidates with “dramatically different views on how to change things.”

The two also have different characters, Sadosky added. McCain’s life history, he said, shows that he “put his country ahead of his personal political ambitions.”

Obama, he said, “time and time again…has placed his own personal and political ambitions ahead of the good of the country.”

  

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes, average: 4.75 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
12 comments

Comments are closed.

But in the end, McCain spokesman Jeff Sadosky said, Missouri voters will choose between two candidates with “dramatically different views on how to change things.”

I think what he meant is that voters can choose between someone who supports almost all of George Bush’s policies - but is from Arizona - or someone who will take the country in a different and better direction. THAT’LL BE A HARD CHOICE IN NOVEMBER!

— GR
5:28 pm June 26th, 2008

Barack Obama will do for democratic politics in Missouri what the Tiger football team did for this year’s freshman enrollment at Mizzou. Bad analogy? But wait, increased enrollment means more young, impressionable, Obama-loving, out-of-staters settling down in mid-Missouri. And by out-of-staters I mean college students who should not be able to vote without a Missouri ID. MU’s freshman class of 2012 will be several thousand students larger than the class of 2011. And the BO campaign will have several thousand potential new voters in mid-Missouri. This must explain why Delbert Scott was rooting for OK last fall…

— tigerontheprowl
6:04 pm June 26th, 2008

Jeff Sadosky didnt say “We have a better chance at taking Missouri if there’s another terrorist attack on American soil…we have to find a way to scare old white people” ?…i’ll bet he was thinking it…maybe scare them with the clone problem, or illegal immigrants or clones of illegal immigrants? Onder?

— Chud
6:20 pm June 26th, 2008

Chud,

Just because McCain’s campaign spokesman WANTS there to be a terrorist attack doesn’t mean he won’t feel bad after it happens.

— GR
6:36 pm June 26th, 2008

Missourians love Obama, that is why Claire wins 2012 reelection on teh coattails of his plan to stop Sardosky from letting terrism destroy the Arch St. Louis in Mccain Dead 2.

— mr.please
6:47 pm June 26th, 2008

Sure, Obama would take us in a “different direction.” Increased taxes. Further restrictions on energy production and use. A Carteresque approach to foreign affairs. That’s change you can believe in … if you’re an idiot.

— Nick Kasoff
7:58 pm June 26th, 2008

PS - Remember, “optimal Democratic turnout” in urban areas means that ACORN will be cranking up their voter registration program. I hope somebody in the MRP is keeping an eye on all this.

— Nick Kasoff
7:59 pm June 26th, 2008

Nick - I think I’m hearing a Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa! Sit back and take a deep breath. It’s going to happen, resign yourself to the fact that there is absolutely nothing you can do about it. You’ve never been very persuasive anyway, even on this parochially oriented blog. Think of it this way, you’ll finally be able to go on the offensive instead of trying to defend a baffoon for the past 8 years. I’ll be waiting.

— mogoid
9:35 pm June 26th, 2008

What register more voters? Boy that sounds like a major crime!

http://www.goclairevp.4t.com/

Change = Wisdom, Life Experience, Outsider down to earth understanding of the People and actual Public Policy like other developing countries Economy, Environment, Transportation ect. = Change in January 2009!

— Steven Reed
9:40 pm June 26th, 2008

Mr. Kasoff…
I totally agree, we need to stay on track..and thats why I assume you’ll be going to Iraq with me next year…SEE YA THERE!!!! Lets put our money where our mouths are…I’ll be there…seriously…I’m in the army…I’ll be there…you will too, right?…if for no other reason, do it for lower taxes…

— Chud
11:30 pm June 26th, 2008

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All