Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
07.22.2008 3:56 pm

DEBATE: What will they do about gas prices?

It’s ironic that Sarah Steelman’s big gas-guzzling bus/RV was parked outside the KMOX studios, and yet the treasurer made mentioning gas prices a focus of her debate strategy.

Steelman mentioned high gas prices during the debate at least four times; and Kenny Hulshof, too, said this election would be settled over “pocketbook issues.”

So how do the two candidates differ on what to do over gas prices?

Steelman would get rid of the ethanol mandate. Hulshof embraces the mandate. The mandate, part of a law pushed by Gov. Matt Blunt and passed into law in 2007, requires gasoline in Missouri to contain 10 percent ethanol if the price is equal to or less than gasoline.

Steelman blames the mandate (which she used to support) for high food prices and says the market should decide. Hulshof said getting rid of the mandate would make the country more reliant on foreign oil and thus would increase gas prices.

The real challenge for both candidates is how they address pocketbook issues during a tough time in the Missouri economy.

Both embrace the economic policies of Blunt and claim that they are responsible for Missouri’s business environment. Yet they both also recognize the reality of the current difficult economic situation. Missouri unemployment is up; jobs are being lost; gas and food prices are high; people are losing their homes.

It’s a tough line for the Republicans to walk, and during the debate they tried to walk it by suggesting that more of Blunt’s policies will grow the economy. Might be a tough sell with voters.

One other note on gas prices: Steelman is continuing her call for an oil refinery to be based in Missouri. Whether the governor can have much effect on that happening is questionable; but it’s a position unique to her.

14 comments

Comments are closed.

I think Steelman has effective rhetoric for a general election, but she’s going to lose to Hulshof in the primary because, for all their rhetoric, most rank-and-file Republicans actually like Washington insiders telling them what to think. That’s why the right wing blogosphere has been such a complete failure.

— Adam S
3:59 pm July 22nd, 2008

Adam, I’m not sure your definition of “failure” but let’s look at the conservative Fox News network. I believe they win every cable news timeslot next to the liberal station, MSNBC, as well as CNN. Obamessiah has been telling you Obama worshippers what to think since he bagan his run and you’ve bought it hook, line, and sinker.

— Logicprevails
4:37 pm July 22nd, 2008

The definition of “failure” won’t help you much when you don’t understand the definition of “blogosphere.” Fox News is not a blog, and it is successful with conservatives precisely because it has a centralized message that comes from party elites.

— Adam S
5:17 pm July 22nd, 2008

So, how did Holshof get to town?

— CHUCKtheFED
7:10 pm July 22nd, 2008

Adam, I dont know what your definition of failure is, but hardly seems that the right side of the blogosphere is a failure, granted, it doesnt get as many hits as the nutroots moonbat side, but it is hardly a failure. It was the right wingers who exposed Rather’s lie about President Bush’s service while the moonbats tried to defend obviously fake documents. Now if you want to talk about absolute failures, I think Err America would fit that bill.

— Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum
7:54 pm July 22nd, 2008

I am so glad someone mentioned the RV….we all know it probably gets 8 miles per gallon. She has the nerve to bring upgas prices! IF (and that is a BIG IF) if she wins theprimary how much money will she spend on gas puttering around the state til November. If she was really concerned about gas prices,she would drive an economical car. I know MISSOURI people are not stupid to recognize this fact. Kenny you havemy vote! Great car !!

— jsure
9:13 pm July 22nd, 2008

Steelman talking ethics and morals cracks me up. I hope people really listen to her and come to the conclusion she is not the best candidate for governor. If Hulshof does not win the primary, then I will vote for Nixon. I am conservative, but I can not bring myself to vote for her.

— Mark J
11:56 pm July 22nd, 2008

Well, I finally found something to agree on with Ms Conservative We So Right. Ethanol for fuel is bad for the economy. Solar and wind energy much less so. Enough black fuel superiority. It has none. Only wealthier lobbyists.

— Slugger
12:04 am July 23rd, 2008

I ask again.
How did Hulshof get to town?
Airplane?
Multiple cars?
Since it isn’t obvious, and he didn’t just cross the street….
How did He get here…
…balanced against the plush endurance of a bus trip.
The superstars fly….right?

— CHUCKtheFED
1:37 am July 23rd, 2008

I forgot to include
“we all know”
I should have

— CHUCKtheFED
1:55 am July 23rd, 2008

Hey Tony- would you rather she took planes back and both between DC and Missouri and then again between KC and STL? Steelman is the only candidate running with any real ideas and for once there’s a politician out there who cares about visiting with the “nobodys” in outstate Missouri- hence the RV- instead of just flying between STL and KC with an occasional stop in Springfield.

— Candice M.
8:26 am July 23rd, 2008

Both candidates displayed their respective strengths, Kenny came out on top I believe, but I am a long term Hulshof supporter.
A new refinery will be constructed in SE SD, as per the vote of the county involved, which will help in midwest and US energy supply, if the environmental lawyers do not mire it in red tape and legal obstruction.
I think this is an idea worth considering in MO, if the county involved agrees, it would be good to place in somewhere where the logistics are exceptional and jobs scarce. Ethanol debate a draw last night.
Jobs loss in MO is a big issue I think. We lost a big plant in the Bombardier decision, Chrysler issue a big loss for many families, and Inbev result will lead to job losses as they cut to satisfy international investors. Unfortunately, the climate or lack of political leadership in MO (by this I am thinking mostly of Claire’s absence from state while she campaigns for VP) contributes to losses. We must address this, I think Kenny can do this best. Nixon will add to snowball.

— MOactiveGOP
11:01 am July 23rd, 2008

Mrs jsure,
What does Kenny drive? I know farmer Kenny has 2 Porsche’s, but I am sure those are in the garage right now since he is trying to portray himself as a southeast Missouri farmer. He must have bought those with the corn subsidies he has recieved from the tax-payers. At least Sarah Steelman is riding in an American made product, and she is not hiding it.

MOgop,
Part of Sarah Steelman’s energy rollout was to bring a new refinery to Missouri, and she said that on the debate last night. Kenny has no plan for energy, because if he did he should have brought it up in Congress, maybe if he had a plan for that or immigration we as a State wouldn’t have to deal with issues that we should be dealing with nationally, but since Congress has failed us again, we need to follow Sarah Steelman’s proven leadership.

— corrupted
12:59 pm July 23rd, 2008

Re: corrupted.

We may agree on these points:

Either Sarah or Kenny are better than Nixon for MO Gov.
The democratic controlled Congress from 2006 toward today has failed us, especially on the energy issue. Voters should carry a pic of Harry/Dick/and Chuck and Nancy on their dash, fill up their tank with gas, and then go vote at the polls.
A refinery in MO may be a very good idea.

However: we disagree on the ethanol subsidy issue, Kenny’s relative strengths vis a vis Sarah, among a few other issues.

One comment–a refinery in MO may not decrease gas prices in MO significantly more than in neighboring states, but will be good energy policy for the common good, for the entire country’s energy security and will add to high paying MO jobs, which is key…

— MOactiveGOP
2:01 pm July 23rd, 2008