Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
08.21.2008 11:23 am

Slay donation divides city Dem Central Committee

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

Notes from this month’s meeting of the city’s Central Democratic Committee show a sharp divide over a contribution the group made to Mayor Francis Slay.Francis Slay

Slay is, of course, a Democrat, and faces re-election next spring. Though nobody yet has emerged to contest him in the March primary, that doesn’t mean he has uniform support among the city’s Democratic Party.

Tension emerged at the August 12 meeting when committee members asked chair Brian Wahby about a $13,000 donation to Slay’s re-election committee, made without the consent of the full committee.

Wahby defended  the donation, saying the committee’s campaign fund was only being used as a “pass through” for another donor.

As a political party, the city Dems have less restrictions on giving to candidates than traditional campaign committees and, as such, can be used as go-between for candidates.

The Dems campaign committee report shows a $15,000 contribution from the “Show Me Pac,” which could be the source of the original funds intended for Slay.

“We have moved money for a number of candidates,” Wahby said, according to an unofficial copy of the minutes.

But State Sen. Maida Coleman, committeewoman from Wahby’s ward, the Seventh,  suggested it wasn’t so much the method, but the individual supported that irked members.

“I think the issue is due to the candidate and the fact that not all of the body supports that candidate. For instance, Francis Slay,” Coleman said, according to the minutes. “Automatically, this insults half of the organization.”

Recorder of Deeds Sharon Carpenter — who represents what was, until he moved recently, Slay’s home ward — said funneling donations for candidates was fair so long as the committee did it for anyone who asked.

“As long as we don’t turn down anyone,” Carpenter said.

But committee member Mike McMillan – the city’s license collector whose name is at the top of the list of potential Slay rivals — said he wasn’t even aware that the city’s central committee could be used as a fundraising tool.

<!– @page { size: 8.5in 11in; margin: 0.79in } P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } –”As a citywide candidate,” McMillan said, “I never knew this could be done.”

In some ways, the discussion is moot, because the state’s cap on campaign contribution limits will soon be repealed, eliminating the need for creative finances.

The debate, though, certainly brings up larger issues about party support for Slay as he seeks a third term.

14 comments

Comments are closed.

it just never stops coming from the mayor’s office, does it?

— dungy1
11:35 am August 21st, 2008

This is a very interesting and fair report. I have been hearing from local political power players that typical donors have been receiving calls from Slay personally (and from others close to him) telling them they need to stay away from Mike McMillan’s upcoming fundraiser. Regardless of the public perception of the mayor or the taint of scandal, there seems to be a concentrated push by the mayor for the business community to close ranks around a candidate they have already invested in a great deal. This may or may not backfire - people with money don’t always like to be told how to spend it.

— Chris King
11:58 am August 21st, 2008

LOL It strikes me that the most successful street criminals also have problems moving their profits around so everybody is happy.

— slugger
12:16 pm August 21st, 2008

Why would Wahby do this? Why not tell the donor to just make the contribution directly to Slay’s campaign when the limits are removed? It amazes me when someone makes a decision that causes so much turmoil when a simpler, less disruptive option is available. Of course Slay’s methods never seem to take the common sense approach if there’s a way to be divisive.

— frank
12:38 pm August 21st, 2008

Read the story.

The $13,000 likely came from Republicans. Slay tried to funnel it through the committee to try and keep the fact that, by far, his major contributors are all Republicans.

— RightON
1:10 pm August 21st, 2008

Slay is a leader who garners respect from people on both sides of the aisle. I wish I could say the same for our county executive. If Mr. Slay would move just a little further west, he’d have my full support for that office.

— Nick Kasoff
1:20 pm August 21st, 2008

I laughed out loud when I read McMillan’s quote! That criminal knows better than anyone in Missouri how to move campaign money around. Amazing how he lives a $100K a year lifestyle on a $45K a year salary.

I am tired of Chris “Rockin” King and Dr. Suggs. We all get it…You don’t like Slay because he won’t pay you guys off like the other politicians do. Seriously, it has gotten old.

Why is Maida mad? Did Slay refuse to give her a no show job after her term is up?

Seriously, first Mayor in 50 years that isn’t scum and the usual suspects all hate him for moving the city forward.

I didn’t vote for him the first time but I did the second time he ran and I will again this time. I just hope he continues to throw the old bums out and finishes cleaning silly hall up. Next, I hope get rid of all of the wastefull “county” offices in the city. Carpenter, Green, McMillan and Dailey…what a waste!

— city res
1:49 pm August 21st, 2008

Show Me PAC is totally under St. Louis County Executive Charlie Dooley’s control.

— Sue
2:05 pm August 21st, 2008

FYI, just for the purpose of full disclosure, Ckhris ing is the editor of the St. Louis American newspaper and writer of the political eye gossip column. He and others at that paper have done nothing but report mis-information and bald face lies about Mayor Slay over the past several years. They are nothing but a bunch of bullies. The sooner local politicos realize that they have literally ZERO impact and on elections, and even less credibility on the street, the better off we all will be.

— insider
2:13 pm August 21st, 2008

One can at least admire the fact that Chris King, if it is indeed the same person as the St. Louis American editor, uses his own name in the above post. Regardless, there does not appear to be anything controversial in either the report or the proported actions taken on behalf of the Slay machine. Who is going to challenge Slay is a theme heard among many political junkies in the city over the last months, and it will continue until a clear answer is sought. McMillan is the first name to come up–he is probably one of the better candidates mentioned with the $$ and the test of previous citywide elections–and Slay is smart to try to neutralize him early on. Slay is likely to continue to get grief from StLAmerican, Dr. Suggs and the anonymous writers of political eye until sometime after Slay announces his retirement from politics, so get used to it.

— amazedbythespinners
3:17 pm August 21st, 2008

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All