Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
08.01.2008 3:37 pm

UPDATED: Who’s behind robocalls against Zweifel, Page?

Post-Dispatch Jefferson City Bureau
  • Email this
  • Print this

‘Tis the season for robocalls, those automated political calls that flood the phone lines right before an election.

This time, Democrats contend there’s a new twist — namely, that Republican campaigns are calling Democratic households, to try to influence Democratic primary battles.

In one robocall, Democratic treasurer candidate Clint Zweifel is accused of saying “no” to everything from “low-income energy assistance” and “school lunches for our kids” to “prescription drugs and medical care for seniors.”

Since the attack comes from an anonymous woman’s voice, we can’t ask the sponsor to back up the allegations. But they certainly don’t ring true.

Zweifel, a Teamsters official, has been an outspoken critic of the Medicaid cuts and the sale of student loan assets. He has offered tax-cut plans for seniors and working families. Zweifel is the best-funded candidate in a four-way Democratic primary for treasurer.

“The Republican establishment is clearly nervous about the possibility of Clint Zweifel bringing needed reforms to the state treasurer’s Office,” said his campaign manager, Patrick Lynn.

Brad Lager, the presumptive Republican nominee for treasurer, couldn’t immediately be reached. But he has hired that well-known robocall attack architect, consultant Jeff Roe of Axiom Strategies in Kansas City. Roe is running Sarah Steelman’s gubernatorial campaign.

Asked whether he was behind the Zweifel calls, Roe said Friday: “I haven’t heard about them. I don’t think I am, but I’ve got 21 people in the office so I’ll check on it.”

In another race, Democrat Sam Page, who is running for lieutenant governor, said he has been hit with robocalls that “blatantly distort my record.”

Page said the points made by the robocaller are similar to those made in radio ads being run by the Republican incumbent, Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder.

“It’s an unprecedented intervention in the Democratic primary by an incumbent” from the other party, Page said.

Kinder’s spokesman, Paul Sloca, responded: “I don’t know anything about those robocalls.” After reading the script, Sloca said: “That sounds like a Democratic robocall to me.”

UPDATE (from Jo Mannies):

Page’s chief Democratic rival, St. Charles lawyer Michael Carter — who runs an automated phone-call operation — said Friday that he wanted to make clear that he was NOT involved in the robo-call effort against Page.

13 comments

Comments are closed.

Two things…

First, Kinder’s slimy, mudslinging robocalls against Sam Page aren’t “similar” to Kinder’s mudslinging radio ads: they are exactly the same! Unlike the radio ads, Kinder’s mudslinging robocalls are illegal because they don’t carry any disclaimer or any indication who paid for them at all. You’d have to be dumber than dumb not to know quite clearly that Kinder is behind the robocalls. What a coward Kinder is! What a woos!

But by failing to use the disclaimer, Kinder is in violation of the campaign laws of the state and somebody should file an ethics complaint against him right now. Only someone who is a complete idiot would buy Kinder’s denial of any knowledge of the robocalls. It’s a despicable, cowardly tactic.

And 2…

Zweifel has little room to complain about negative robocalls given that he is paying for anti-Simckes robocalls. What chutzpah!

— oldhand
4:54 pm August 1st, 2008

Two of the calls I received had the same woman reading each script. One call was against Zweifel, and the other call was for Becky Plattner running as a Democrat for lt governor. Since Kinder recruited Plattner to run against Page, it is pretty obvious the Republicans not only lie on robocalls, but also to reporters.

— JT
5:14 pm August 1st, 2008

As Zweifel’s campaign manager, I can assure readers that the Zweifel campaign has not paid for any robocalls, either supporting Clint or opposing any opponent.

Old hand, if you would like to discuss further, please call the campaign at (314) 645-0555.

— patrick@clintfortreasurer.com
5:22 pm August 1st, 2008

Michael E. Carter, the leading candidate for the Democratic spot as Lieutenant Governor, has placed no calls since July 20, 2008.

However, Carter wishes all politicians/candidates would adhere to his MISSOURI POLTICAL DO NOT CALL LIST that already has upwards of 10,000 registered voters.

It’s worth noting that this “opt out” approach to rid voters of poltical robo calls is the only NO CALL option that would pass U.S. Constitutional muster. NO OTHER CANDIDATE HAS OFFERED a legally viable alternative.

As Lt. Governor, Carter will push legislation to legally enact the MISSOURI POLITICAL DO NOT CALL LIST, but for now you can register on the voluntary list at http://WWW.VOTE4CARTER.COM

Chad Carter
chad@vote4carter.com
http://www.vote4carter.com
314-591-0169

— Chad Carter
6:39 pm August 1st, 2008

Jo’s entry has the quote of the weekend from scumbag Republican consultant Jeff Roe:

—Asked whether he was behind the Zweifel calls, Roe said Friday: “I haven’t heard about them. I don’t think I am, but I’ve got 21 people in the office so I’ll check on it.”—

It’s as if Roe is running a sanitation company and he doesn’t know the garbage truck routes his drivers are taking.

— bobbiep
12:44 am August 2nd, 2008

It’s pretty obvious that it is Roe behind these robo-calls. It’s actually a usual tactic played by him. He’s been trying to play the guy behind the scenes this whole election after losing an election last year because he garnered more attention than his candidate. It’s called plausible deniability folks.

— Smile
1:16 am August 2nd, 2008

“I haven’t heard about them. I don’t think I am, but I’ve got 21 people in the office so I’ll check on it.” Most stupid non-denial denial I’ve ever heard. Doesnt know what the people in his office do for his candidates? Is that the kind of office Lager intends to run? Bobbiep made point first, of course. and for the record, wrote my post before reading theirs. sort of an obvious point, but still good to make. Best response would have been, “dont comment on what I do or dont do, yea or nay.” not that I would ever say that.

— Bill Haas
7:05 am August 2nd, 2008

Oldhand,

Disclaimers are not required on phone calls in Missouri.

What else don’t you know?

— Toad
8:11 am August 2nd, 2008

That’s nice, Toad. Disclaimers are not required, let’s adhere to the lowest legal standard available. I received Carter’s phone calls several times, I will say this for him, he identified himself and gave an opt-out possibility.

If I knew who was behind these calls against Page, I would vote against that person. I have been getting one everyday. Nothing like a nice, anonymous political attack to raise my political conciousness. I think maybe I am just a typical guy, and my typical guy reaction is to vote against the author of those “say no to Page” calls. I hope that campaign tactic is backfiring.

— Bonehead
4:13 pm August 2nd, 2008

I think it is safe to say that “toad” is a reference to a previous post of scumbag, i think if we find out who toad is we have a winner.

— tj
4:27 pm August 2nd, 2008

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All