Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
09.27.2008 5:49 pm

McCain-Obama battle over Missouri “Truth Squad”

Special to the Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

With the Missouri polls showing a dead heat between Republican John McCain and Democrat Barack Obama, every campaign move is igniting scrutiny.

That’s the backdrop over a two-day dust-up that is attracting local TV coverage, and has even ignited a Web fight between the Drudge Report and the Daily Kos.

At issue is a new Obama “Truth Squad” formed in the state.

(As an aside, please note that both sides have “Truth Squads” in numerous states, under numerous titles. McCain’s campaign has an Honest and Open Election Committee, whose Missouri members include former Sen. John Danforth and U.S. Rep. Jo Ann Emerson, and another state McCain group monitoring any Democratic jabs at Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.)

Obama’s Missouri Truth Squad members include St. Louis Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce, Jefferson County Sheriff Glenn Boyer and St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Bob McCulloch, among others.

The inclusion of such officials has led to Gov. Matt Blunt, among other Republicans, to accuse the Obama camp of planning “to use Missouri law enforcement to threaten and intimidate his critics.”

That tack was repeated in a conference call Saturday, where Republican National Committee deputy chairman Frank Donatelli said that the issue was the inclusion of law-enforcement officials on Obama’s squad. He called for Joyce, McCulloch, et al to step down.

In a statement Saturday (issued from the governor’s office), Blunt went further and contended that the state Obama campaign and its allies, including U.S. Sen. Claire McCaskill “have attached the stench of police state tactics…”

His assertion was that the squad might prosecute people deemed to have made inaccurate or inappropriate claims against Obama.

“Barack Obama needs to grow up. Leftist blogs and others in the press constantly say false things about me and my family. Usually, we ignore false and scurrilous accusations because the purveyors have no credibility. When necessary, we refute them,” Blunt said in the statement. “Enlisting Missouri law enforcement to intimidate people and kill free debate is reminiscent of the Sedition Acts - not a free society.”

Obama’s national campaign manager David Plouffe said Saturday that Truth Squads simply monitor attacks and refute them.

Later, state communications director Debbie Mesloh issued a statement that called it “the height of absurdity” for  the GOP to contend that the Obama squad planned to go to court or jail critics.

She contended that Blunt, Donatelli, et al are out “to deceive voters about the role of respected Missourians across the state who want to see this election be about the truth, not false attacks like the ones we’ve seen today.

“Barack Obama’s Truth Squad is comprised of members of the community who – on their own time – are dedicated to raising the level of discourse in this campaign…,” she added.

By the way, a quick surf of the Internet found a McCain Truth Squad in New Hampshire, formed last January, that included several public officials with prosecutorial powers, including the state attorney general.

However, state Republicans have sent out a list of dozens of officeholders — who are lawmakers, not law enforcers — who they said make up the bulk of McCain’s Truth Squads around the country.

  

72 comments

Comments are closed.

little jenny needs a trip to the woodshed. the type of position she is in should not be political nor should she be out working for any candidate. i read how obama and john kerry are “nuanced” and the low life’s don’t understand. well we understand this one and its un American!

— socal sammy
1:06 pm September 29th, 2008

It is about time Americans wake up to the real Obama before it is too late. Educate your friends, relatives and neighbors with the real truth.

— Linda Pantano
1:13 pm September 29th, 2008

To The Moderator

RULES OF THE ROAD
” So we’re asking for your help. In the spirit of that free exchange of ideas, keep the conversation clean and respectful. If you see something objectionable, please send us an e-mail.”

I strongly recommend the Post Dispatch review the content of all these online forums.
I am an experienced poster here to recognize the few “regular” posters style.

During the last several days the tone and style of the overwhelming number of posts has changed dramatically especially in this forum and those I’ve to below.

I believe these forums have been infiltrated by paid posters with no desire to allow any exchange of ideas, rather a desire only to disrupt and post their toxic material in such volume as to discourage legitimate posters from even trying to participate.

These many new posters provide content I interpret as coming from the extreme right. Their tactics also include using handles with unusual sounding names in posts supporting Obama. So they post toxic extreme right material and some that sound left but include well known code words the extreme right uses to slime their opponents.

A setup post on their intent was made by — Mary F. at 6:03 am September 29th, 2008 in this forum. It’s pretty easy to spot their posts as they rarely engage with any other posters on the board.

Moderator, review the contents of this board and consider if this forum has been high jacked by a band of internet thugs supporting a national interest.

http://www.stltoday.com/blogzone/political-fix/political-fix/2008/09/joyce-on-truth-squad-not-about-prosecuting-people/#comment-26644

— STL
1:27 pm September 29th, 2008

Just another Chicago political machine thug tactic. If you want the truth the whole truth please report it. Went to a church for 20 years with a very questionable pastor who just one day out lashed at America. But he was your mentor right? Born a Muslim? Middle name Hussein? Voted 96% of the time with party? Supports late term abortion? Rezko? Fannie and Freddie CEO’s on your campaign? Voting record? ACORN? WOODS FOUNDATION? Big ears? When was the last time race was a ISSUE other then when you and your supporters mention it? ERE marks of a million a day? i don’t know but there is a long list of questionable topics concerning BHO and they out weigh a good speech in 2004. I will be glad to post my address for the enforcers to come a knocking. Thank You

— andersonathan
4:16 pm September 29th, 2008

“I strongly recommend the Post Dispatch review the content of all these online forums.
I am an experienced poster here to recognize the few “regular” posters style.”

What the holy hell are you talking about? Are you the Blog Cop now? You suffer from delusions of grandeur.

“During the last several days the tone and style of the overwhelming number of posts has changed dramatically especially in this forum and those I’ve to below.”

English as a second language?

“I believe these forums have been infiltrated by paid posters with no desire to allow any exchange of ideas, rather a desire only to disrupt and post their toxic material in such volume as to discourage legitimate posters from even trying to participate.”

I believe you are an idiot, and I have as much proof as you do that the board is infiltrated by paid posters.

“These many new posters provide content I interpret as coming from the extreme right. Their tactics also include using handles with unusual sounding names in posts supporting Obama. So they post toxic extreme right material and some that sound left but include well known code words the extreme right uses to slime their opponents.”

Good work detective. How is it you can spot a phony moonbat so easily, but probably have never met a real conservative? Any minute now I know your going to give us this list of “well known code words”

“It’s pretty easy to spot their posts as they rarely engage with any other posters on the board.”

Just because some posters dont wish to participate in your moonbat circle jerk, doesnt mean they dont want to engage in discussion.

“Moderator, review the contents of this board and consider if this forum has been high jacked by a band of internet thugs supporting a national interest.”

Why dont you just send a list to Jennifer Joyce, she can sort it out and prosecute the offenders. Its not like we have any other crimes in St Louis to deal with.

— Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum
5:20 pm September 29th, 2008

— Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum
“What the holy hell are you talking about? Are you the Blog Cop now? You suffer from delusions of grandeur.’

o Nice try but it won’t sell. Besides, I’m the second one to mention it, as I cited in my post to the moderator, a fact you conveniently ignored. The first was — Mary F. at 6:03 am September 29th, 2008.
o Where’s your outrage about the post by Mary F. Scroll up to read it.

o I posted several times about my suspicions, Scroll up to see those. Seeing no change in behavior, I reread the Rules of the Road. I did not see a way to contact the moderator off line so posted to get the moderators attention. I stated my suspicions and pointed out what I felt was the evidence. I suggested the moderator review the posts. It’s up to the moderator to take whatever action is deemed appropriate, I’m just a casual observer.

“I believe you are an idiot, and I have as much proof as you do that the board is infiltrated by paid posters.”
o Actually I expect you have more proof than me that the board has been infiltrated. Paid or volunteers, doesn’t really make any difference because the intent is the same - disrupt attempts to exchange via legitimate posting by flooding the forum with vile, viscous posts filled with outright and subtle accusations and lies. Reduce or stamp out the flow of info that counters the McCain campaign’s misconceptions and lies about Obama.

Good work detective. How is it you can spot a phony moonbat so easily, but probably have never met a real conservative? Any minute now I know your going to give us this list of “well known code words”
o Kind of a rough way to congratulate me but I accept your pat on the back.
o As for conservative my best friend is a conservative, pretty dug in and civil in our political discussions.
o Don’t be coy, you know the code words like a pro.

“Just because some posters dont wish to participate in your moonbat circle jerk, doesnt mean they dont want to engage in discussion.”
o Not just some but the overwhelming majority of the newbies. In addition, there’s also posting with references to other posters that did not post on this forum.
o Kinda fishy.

-> I thought I knew all the political terms but this new one, circle jerk, has me confused.
-> Please tell me how it relates to your political life.
-> Then tell me how it relates to your social life

“Why dont you just send a list to Jennife Joyce, she can sort it out and prosecute the offenders. Its not like we have any other crimes in St Louis to deal with.”
o I’ll leave that to you. Perhaps you can get her to count it as your community service for the week.
o More false outrage - you know, it’s a duck.

- if it looks like a duck
- and quacks like a duck
- then it’s a duck
I’m confident I know what’s happening.

— STL
9:23 pm September 29th, 2008

McCain Supporters

Pep Talk

o I know it must be disheartening to see so much daylight between candidates in the polls.

o It must have been particularly frustrating last week when McCain tried a power play on the debates, then blinked and participated. Just the spine I want in my #1 sitting across the table from Vladimir Putin - a #1 that blinks over showing up for a debate.

o Then there’s debate#1, where Obama took McCain to school despite the 100 minute McCain snub. Oh, that’s another thing. I want a #1 that looks right into the bad guys eyes, rather than somebody that doesn’t even have the backbone to look at a United States Senator during a 100 minute debate.

Hope That Helped

— STL
9:26 pm September 29th, 2008

So the ‘wittle baby Obama needs a truth squad. Wah wah. I hear the wittle baby crying. Give the wittle baby Obama a pacifier and his bottle. Oh, no, give the wittle baby Barry his wittle truth squad. Does wittle baby Barry needs his diapy changed ? Oh, the widddle, wimpy baby Barry. Here’s your truth squad, wittle Baby Barry.

Give me a flipping break. With his head tilted to the side, and his constant whistling of his “S’s”, can you SEE the wimpy Obama standing up to Iran, North Korea, and the terrorists?? Will wittle Barry ask the terrorists for his wittle truth squad ?

Can you see Ronald Reagan, Dwight Eisenhauer, Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, Richard Nixon, Abraham Lincoln, etc. asking for a truth squad? They were real men. They didn’t need a freakin truth squad. They were able to handle the heat. I guess they don’t make men like that anymore. Now we have a ‘man’ running for president who needs a ‘truth squad.’ My dad fought in two wars. He was a real man. He woudn’t have asked for a stupid truth squad.

Obama is a wimpy phony. He spreads lies about everyone else, but doesn’t like when it’s turned on him. Typical Liberal phony.

Little Barry Obama reminds me of the kid on the playground who no one liked or wanted to play with because he was such a stuck up wittle goody two shoes, only out for himself. The reality is that wittle Barry just needed to get his butt kicked around the playground a few times like the rest of us did. Oh well, maybe the Chinese or Iranians or North Koreans will do it for him.

— NipTuk
10:36 pm September 29th, 2008

I thought this was interesting, I know I’ll be going
up the river for it but it should be seen………
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NU6fuFrdCJY
It all googles true but maybe my new cell mates will
tell me where I went wrong.

— malevoter
7:58 am September 30th, 2008

— NipTuk
10:36 pm September 29th, 2008
“rant, rant, rant”

I doubt if you will feel much better because this may be the root cause for your anger

o a #1 that blinks over showing up for a debate.
o a #1 that doesn’t even have the backbone to look at a United States Senator during a 100 minute debate.

— STL
8:27 am September 30th, 2008

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 » Show All