Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
09.15.2008 11:27 am

Nixon and Hulshof trade “tax and spend” barbs in ads

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

Things are starting to get confusing for voters who have to sift through the allegations being made in television ads in the governor’s race. Both Democrat Jay Nixon’s latest ad and Republican Kenny Hulshof’s latest ad accuse the other candidate of having supported what is called the largest tax increase in Missouri history.

And in that regard, both ads appear accurate. Nixon backed a tax increase for education pushed by then Gov. Mel Carnahan which was at the time called the largest tax increase in Missouri history; and Hulshof expressed his support for Proposition B, a 2002 gas tax proposal that would have been the largest tax hike in state history. That tax failed at the ballot box.

What’s interesting about both claims is that in neither case did Nixon or Hulshof support the two taxes legislatively, but they expressed their support to reporters asking their positions.

But another claim in the Hulshof ad is misleading. His latest ad claims that Nixon’s various proposal would “require another tax increase.” And to back this claim (in small print), Hulshof refers to a news conference held by state Sen. Gary Nodler and state Rep. Allen Icet in which they criticized Nixon’s health care proposals and said they would require either a tax increase or cutting from other departments.

First, there’s some wiggle room there that isn’t expressed in the ad. And second, Nodler and Icet are political allies of Hulshof who have been spending much of their time attacking Nixon over the past year. To rely on their “analysis” in an ad is a bit unfair.

It would be fine for Hulshof to say that he believes that Nixon’s proposals would require a tax increase. But to present it as fact is misleading.

8 comments

Comments are closed.

Yes, but the stark difference between the two tax increases has to do with voter input! Proposition B was sent to the voters. SB 380 was not.

Dems had the chance to reinstitute the Medicaid cuts this year, not one dem voted for it on the floor of the House.

Seems to me that all they want to do is whine about the things that get done, rather than telling what they want to do, or more importantly HOW THEY WANT TO DO THEM!!!

— Jim (the republican)
11:56 am September 15th, 2008

Jim (R)….Do your homework or provide us with the actual legislation.

In March 2008, the Missouri House Democrats made an aggressive attempt to shift money in the $22.4 billion state budget to restore most of the 2005 Medicaid cuts but fell short along a party line vote of 61 to 88.

— Garrison
1:14 pm September 15th, 2008

Garrison, you know damn good and well that I do my homework. Steve Hunter (R-Jasper County) offered an amendment on the floor of the House to restore the Medicaid cuts. During his debate, he announced that he was tired of hearing democrats whine and complain about it, so he offered the amendment. Not one democrat voted for it. Period. If they had voted for it, it would have taken away their petty campaign issue.

I’m not certain which bill it was an amendment to, nor do I care to look it up. Before you call me a liar, however, I would suggest you look it up, yourself. Otherwise, you’ll just stand out as the bungling idiot that you normally prove yourself to be.

You can complain all you want until you get your Utopian society of having EVERYBODY on welfare — Holden sure had us going down that path — but when republicans stand in your way, all you can do is ask for some cheese to go with your whine.

— Jim (the republican)
2:37 pm September 15th, 2008

‘Whine” is the official drink of the republican party, isn’t it?

— llbean
2:57 pm September 15th, 2008

Look around you, llbean … see who is whining and who isn’t.

— Jim (the republican)
3:09 pm September 15th, 2008

Jim (R)…Now I get it. Hoosier Hunter attached the amendment to a bill he knew the Democrats vehemently [and without question] oppossed. That way, yahoos like you can say the Democrats didn’t want to restore childrens healthcare in Missouri….Kind of like when Talent voted to increase the minimum wage when he knew Bush would veto the bill…..That way he could lie to the voters and say he was for increasing the minimum wage, when everyone in Missouri knew he was against it. That’s why he got his butt kicked…..
Missourians aren’t idiots. You, Talent and the idiots who think Missourians are idiots…. are the real idiots.

— Garrison
3:38 pm September 15th, 2008

Garrison - I know it’s a lot to expect of you but could you at least get some of your facts correct?

Hunter offered the amendment to a bill that passed 104-37. That means a lot of democrats voted for it.

The democrats had a bill that would have raised taxes by $1 billion. Seems to me that if they were serious about restoring people who don’t qualify for taxpayer funded welfare - they could have voted for a mere $300 million tax increase.

— JasonB
9:36 pm September 15th, 2008

Jason, you’re directing you smartass comments to the wrong person. I was responding to Jim (R) when he claimed not one Democrat voted to restore healthcare benefits to Missourians…That’s when I asked him to provide the legislation which he couldn’t do. I then speculated on his conclusions…I think you’re referring to a piece of legislation that will leave Jim (R) clueless and confused.

— Garrison
8:33 am September 16th, 2008