Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
09.03.2008 11:09 pm

Palin meets the test — and then some

Post-Dispatch Washington Bureau
  • Email this
  • Print this

ST. PAUL — Realizing that he must follow this act, John McCain must be wondering if he over-picked when choosing Sarah Palin as his running mate.

Palin, whose selection has dominated the conversations during the the GOP convention thus far, dominated inside Xcel Center on Thursday night with a speech that endorsed McCain in ringing terms, scolded her detractors and presented herself as a force to be reckoned with.

Her appearance was all the more remarkable considering that she had never before faced such pressure. Prior to the speech, we posed five questions that about the speech. Here are some answers:

1. Can she reclaim her reputation? Yes. In the days since her surprise selection, Palin has endured a great deal of scrutiny, some of it dealing with here family and her staunchly conservative beliefs, probably all of it uncomfortable for her.

Time will tell if the digging underway will yield much, or anything, of substance. On Thursday night, she presented herself as someone devoted to family and public service, an appealing package for those just getting to know her.

2. Is she up to the job? Debatable, but when she described her successes in Alaska state government, she likely persuaded many people that she can handle Washington. In a convention heavy on rhetoric and short on substance, her tales of taking on “the culture of self-dealing” and challenging Alaska’s old-boy network may have been the high point of her speech. Likewise, her discussion of promoting a gas pipeline suggested that she could capably handle energy issues in a McCain administration.

3. Will she come off as an “every woman” in a way that helps her ticket? Yes. She spent a good deal of time introducing her family and her references to the PTA and the “things” and challenges a family faces surely connected with a lot of women, among them disaffected Hillary Clinton supporters. After discussions with McCain advisers, she didn’t address squarely her young daughter’s pregnancy, which probably was in good taste.

4. Will she emerge as McCain’s attack dog? Oh yea. She showed again and again that she could slip in the knife in while smiling. Sure, these lines were written for her — like the one about Obama having authored 2 memoirs but no laws or reforms — or her reference to the styrofoam columns in Denver. Some were intellectually dishonest, like saying something to the effect that Obama would be more concerned about reading terrorists their rights than terrorism itself. But her barbs drew blood, and she seemed to enjoy giving them.

5. Will she go after the news media? Most definitely, and this crowd loved it. “I’m not going to Washington to seek their good opinions. I’m going to go there to serve the people of this country.”

9 comments

Comments are closed.

So a former TV sportscaster, now a 20 month Governor of a state with a population smaller than St. Louis County does a good read of a red meat speech written by one of George Bush’s attack dogs and you’re all gaga?

Bill, it’s time to leave the job, write your memoirs and go home and sit in front of the fire reading a good book (probably not your memoirs!).

1. What reputation? Nobody knows Governor Palin, not even Senator McCain who never met her for five minutes before selecting her as veep. The “rep” issue is still out pending the news from The Inquirer.

2. “up to the job?” She has admitted she doesn’t even know what the job of the veep is, for goshsakes! But, hobknobbing with Big Oil seems to be a GOP veep requirement, just like Cheney. 20 months as a governor doth not a President make.

3. Palin has nothing in common with any Hillary supporters except her gender. Perhaps you have some ancient lost librarian fantasies you’re acting out here but, get a life!

4. See the first part of the post!

5. Palin has to go after the news media, she’s got nothing else to run on or against!

Palin is just more proof that John Mccain is STILL too ignorant to be President!

http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/08/04/15-reasons-john-mccain-is-too-ignorant-to-be-president/

— Tim Hogan
1:01 am September 4th, 2008

THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU!!!
You are an awsome speaker and I am so glad to be a republican.
You nailed Obama where he needed to be hit and I’m grateful. Bless you and your family. You are in our prayers

— Susie
1:12 am September 4th, 2008

“2. Is she up to the job? Debatable,” I suppose it is as debatable as whether or not Bill can rein in his biases in at least one posting. So far hasn’t demonstrated that’s possible.

Hogan’s post is but one more example of how the democrats are scared witless, well that’s assuming they had any, but they are certainly scared of the little woman from Alaska. Of course, since their nominee has even less experience and no record of achievement, anybody would have scared them.

— Jackson
8:04 am September 4th, 2008

Is there a limit to how many times somebody can cut and paste the same link before it is considered spam? Tim Hogan is STILL too ignorant to be a blog poster. But he’s a great parrot for moveon.org talking points.

— Nick Kasoff
8:28 am September 4th, 2008

I find it interesting how Palin didn’t mention the “good old Republican conservative family values in her speech last night.” When will we hear about those “good old Republican conservative family values” and how they have worked for her and her family?

I would like to hear some more from her about those “good old Republican conservative family values” - you know the ones that include replacing sex education with abstinence. How did that work for her daughter?

I point to Palin’s press release asking everyone to “respect” her daughter’s “choice.” You know what Palin, everyone does respect your daughter’s choice. It’s you and the Republican party that doesn’t “respect” women and their right to make their own personal “choices.”

I respect her daughter and her choices. I feel compassion for her and the situation she is in, and hope with all my heart that she, the father, and the baby all have a life filled with love and compassion expressed to them and expressed by them to others.

But, when her mother and her mother’s Republican party spend the last 8 years trying to take away women’s rights and pass legislation based on “Republican conservative family values” claiming that the Republicans have better morals than any other party - it unfortunately makes her daughter’s teenage pregnancy fair game for public comment.

It’s either a personal family issue for the family to handle and make decisions and “choices” in private (which is what Palin is expressing she now wants to do) or it’s an issue for government to legislate and mandate personal choices for families (which is what Palin and the Republican Party have worked at for at least the last 8 years.)

Palin and the Republicans cannot have it both ways. Hypocrisy is the word that comes to mind regarding the actions of Palin and the Republicans concerning the pregnancy of her pregnant,unmarried teenage daughter.

Okay so she thinks her kids (specifically the 17-year-old unmarried pregnant daughter) not the son going off to war - are off limits to the press and everyone else, but she can use them all as props?

Newsflash for Palin - you paraded them out in front of everyone. If you are going to use your daughter and children as a props, as an example of your pro-life stance and of your “good old Republican family values,” then you are the one that has put her out there in the public spotlight and made her situation public and open for debate.

The Republicans have been quoted as saying the Democrats don’t want to talk about the issues facing our nation, such as our failing economy, our dependence on foreign oil (and healthcare - which of course I don’t think they mentioned)- and that the Democrats instead want talk about personal issues relating to Palin.

Hah! All the Republicans have done for the last 8 years, on the national level and state level (Missouri) is waste precious time trying to pass legislation regulating our personal lives. They have had 8 years to improve our economy and change our dependence on foreign oil and instead they have spent the time trying to regulate what America’s morals should be. The Republicans have not even started debate on these important issues facing our nation in the 8 years they have had control of the nation and the State of Missouri. Instead, they want to tell people what to do with their personal lives.

And now, Palin’s personal situation is off-limits? Hypocrisy. And it needs to be pointed out, unfortunately at the expense of her pregnant teenage daughter.

— Taylor
8:38 am September 4th, 2008

Bill, I think you reflected what most people felt. We may be looking at the next Reagan. I have never been prouder of the Republican party whether we win or not in Nov. In fact, I have complete confidence in her as a president also should that happen.

Hogan - anyone who endorsed Edwards should find a hole and crawl in it and should not be posting comments on blogs about anything ever again.

— A CENTRIST
9:45 am September 4th, 2008

OK. Someone please help my poor public school educated brain wrap around this thought. As Governor Sarah Palin stood up to the “Good Old Boy Network.” This makes her a champion within the Republican party. The members of that “Good Old Boy Network” were also members of the Republican party. Why is that an accomplishment?

— LU 95
11:34 am September 4th, 2008

The real motive for this madness over Sarah McCain is not what it appears.
There is a certain ilk, (those Texan oil-men) Bush/Cheney and their Republican sheep that has been behind Sarah Palin all along they pegged her long ago. Earmarks and all of those million of dollars from Washington filtered to her State, Alaska making her out to be a HERO in the eyes of Alaskans for extremely high ratings by the citizens of Alaska. Typical Republican long term scheming, there is always a motive to their madness.

They have McCain also in their pockets and he is not his own man or the maverick that he was once known for because he is now in their pockets in everyway. Even in his choice of Sarah Palin as his running mate. McCain has CHANGED. Funny how that can happen, Mrs. Cindy want to be first lady and McCain sold his soul to make that happen for her. Her investment in McCain and as his wife she hopes will now pay off.

Alaska is seen in the eyes of the Bush/Cheney oil-men the new Iraq because Iraq has not worked as planned, the new leadership has stabbed these oil hound dogs in their back after getting rid of Saddam for the sect who has replaced Saddam Hussein and now this new leadership is wanting to kick the U.S. out of Iraq with plans for them to benefit mainly from the oil and others as hired help. This is not what these oilmen counted on. It all has backfired on them and the U.S.

So now Alaska, these ones now have their eyes on and are why the “OIL-MEN REPUBLICAN SHEEP” in Washington are so anxious to lift the legislative ban on coastal exploration in the OCS and Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. ANWAR! President George W. Bush already lifted a 1990 executive order about two months ago prohibiting drilling.

CONNECT THE DOTS! ALASKA - SARAH PALIN – OIL….

The Republican ilk (oil-men) plans are to keep themselves set up pretty in Washington in our White House running this country and controlling any OIL that this country may have because of their own personal self interests. Same old, same old, nothing new!

— D. Walker
1:01 pm September 4th, 2008

Wow Bill! You actually wrote a piece about Palin without letting your gender bias show. You’re making progress.

In the future, please don’t use the word “pounded” when talking about Gov. Palin.

Show some respect!

— James
1:54 pm September 4th, 2008