Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
10.24.2008 9:21 am

Lager not really Blunt’s best friend

Post-Dispatch Jefferson City Bureau
  • Email this
  • Print this
Brad Lager

Brad Lager

Anyone who knows Brad Lager well would be amused at Clint Zweifel’s ad calling Lager Gov. Matt Blunt’s “best friend.”

In his four years in the House and two years in the Senate, Lager has often been a thorn in Blunt’s side.

A fiscal conservative, Lager complained when Blunt presented his budget proposal this year because spending increased at a faster clip than revenue growth.

Lager also has been the voice of caution on Blunt’s tax credits plans, such as the mega-tax credit packages that Republicans passed for developer Paul McKee and Bombardier Aerospace.

When the state’s biodiesel subsidies spiked, Lager complained about that, too, even though the leading beneficiary of the subsidies was a company represented by the governor’s lobbyist-brother, Andy Blunt.

That doesn’t mean Lager always disagreed with Matt Blunt.

Lager was one of the biggest backers of Blunt’s 2005 Medicaid cuts. As House Budget Committee chairman, Lager submitted a budget bill that chopped even more low-income parents from the rolls than Blunt had suggested. Lager said the state had to live within its means.

In fact, Lager was so frugal that House Speaker Rod Jetton dumped him as budget chair when Lager called for a freeze on new state programs.

The point is that Lager, while consistently conservative on fiscal matters, has displayed an independent streak when it comes to his party. This year, he was part of a six-member group of senators — three Republicans and three Democrats — who joined together to make the Senate more bipartisan by avoiding filibusters.

Lager and Zweifel are competing in the race for state treasurer.

8 comments

Comments are closed.

Lager said. “I personally look at where Missouri is today versus four years, and under Matt Blunt’s leadership we have changed this state for the better.”

— e
10:15 am October 24th, 2008

wanted to cut more people from the medicaid rolls? Yikes!?

— Richard
10:18 am October 24th, 2008

“e” — I challenge you to consider what Missouri’s economic condition would be like today had Blunt not cut taxes and invested in a surplus budget.

— tana
11:15 am October 24th, 2008

Poor people would have health care coverage? And we, the taxpayers, wouldn’t be footing their emergency room bills?

More kids would be using MOHELA to go to college? Hopefully avoiding another generation of under-employed poor people who don’t have health care coverage?

— e
11:41 am October 24th, 2008

tana

baby blunt ruined missour’s economy…
loss of jobs…
loss of jobs…
loss of jobs.

case closed.

lager is not good for missouri

vote for Clint Zweifel…i am.

— llbean
11:49 am October 24th, 2008

wanted to cut more people from medicaid rolls? Good for him!!

llbean is right though. It is Blunt’s fault that Chrysler, Ford, and GM are cutting jobs because no one is buying their product.

— Amazedbythelunacy
1:00 pm October 24th, 2008

Lager is very independent. Zwiefel has bee a very weak representative with no substance other than partisan politics.

Virginia - you need to do a little more homework on why Lager was fired as budget chair. Had nothing to do with a call “for a freeze on new state programs.”

Clueless e - might want to actually get some facts before posting things that are an embarassment to you even as an anonymous poster. MOHELA issues - nothing to do with Blunt’s MOHELA program. If you really want to know the truth, try calling the executive director of MOHELA. I wont’ hold my breath though. Of course I know you are of the type that don’t want to be confused by the facts.

People who actually are poor are still getting healthcare today. As a matter of fact, the ones who actually qualify are actually getting services since more doctors are now taking medicaid again than when people who didn’t qualify for the welfare paymnents were getting them.

— jasonB
3:22 pm October 24th, 2008

Lager, indeed, voted to reduce the Medicaid roles in Missouri. At the time, one in five folks were participating and no one was getting good service. Now, those who need it most are receiving better quality care. For those who don’t agree with the reduction in Medicaid, find an underserved, low-income Missourian and pay for their health care. It’s still better than socialized medicine.

— xrep
11:34 am October 25th, 2008