Newsflash, “logic”. The Bush years are leaving us alot less well off than anything Carter might have done. As if everything else Bush has done to us isn’t enough, now he’s wrecked our economy as well. As we nosedive into a depression, Bush will go down as worse than Hoover. McCain votes with the guy 90% of the time, so no chance for change there.

Obama believes in tax breaks for the middle class. Call that socialism all you want, but when middle class people have more money in their pocket, they have more money to spend to pump into to economy instead of just making passive income off it like the rich can do. Republican economic policies have been perpetrating reverse socialism ever since Reagan, with wealth being redistributed from the middle class to the very wealthy.

Under Obama’s plan, if you make under $250,000, you will get a tax break under Obama, and if you make more than $250,000 you’ll pay just as much in taxes as people did during the administration of your hero, Ronald Reagan. I don’t call that socialism, I call that fairness. We don’t need anymore Republican-style socialism.

Taking your logic a step farther, why should Obama stop at 250k? Why not a true progressive tax system. Let’s face it, the country needs the money. What about leaving Buffet and Gates a billion each and taking all the rest of their money? I mean, what do they need that they can’t buy with a billion? They used our country’s infrastructure to make the money and they have already said they plan to donate it to a charitable foundation which will not benefit the government and which is giving them a big tax break on the donation. Why stop at the rich? Why not have a higher rate for the uber rich?