Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
11.04.2008 11:47 pm

Loss limits on the way out

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

Casinos appear to have won their big bet to take loss limits off the table in Missouri.

With 92 percent of precincts reporting, Missouri voters were on their way to approving Proposition A, 55 percent to 45 percent. That would bring an end to the state’s one-of-a-kind $500 loss limit and card requirement at casinos, while capping the number of licenses at 13 and boosting taxes by five percent.

It’s something casinos have been pushing for years - they say it’s key to staying competitive with gaming facilities in neighboring states - and this year Ameristar Casinos and Pinnacle Entertainment spent $15 million on their campaign. They included a 5 percent tax hike that could generate between $105 million and $130 million in new school funding and ran a campaign focused on the benefits to education.

The measure’s backers called the vote “a win for our state’s economy, our schools and common sense.”

“It means Missouri can finally compete for casino visitors and revenues on a level playing field with neighboring states, and it means there will be more revenues to help fund elementary and secondary education from the gaming tax paid by casinos,” the Yes on A Coalition said in a statement.

Prop A won by solid margins in both the St. Louis and Kansas City areas, where most of the larger Missouri casinos are located. It trailed in many counties in the Bootheel, and in central and southwestern parts of the state.

3 comments

Comments are closed.

Removed loss limits and no new casinos allowed to be built? Ameristar et al certainly got their money’s worth.

— Dave
8:56 am November 5th, 2008

Thank goodness!
Funny how the only main contributer to try and stop the bill was the Casino Queen… FROM Illinois! Trying to kick Missouri down!

— zink
12:12 pm November 5th, 2008

What a joke for casino corporations to claim that Proposition A had anything to do with being competitive. Proposition A was a protectionist measure written by and for current operators. They are afraid of competition, or otherwise they would have no problem with more licenses. I think that the least we can do with lifting the working class money theft limit is to give gamblers some more choices.

— Jackson
4:03 pm November 5th, 2008