Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
01.05.2009 11:06 am

Coleman confusion takes center stage at City Hall

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this
Maida Coleman, left, and Denise Watson-Wesley Coleman

Maida Coleman, left, and Denise Watson-Wesley Coleman

Not since a deranged tarp ate up a Cardinal outfielder in the 1985 National League Championship Series has a Coleman caused so much consternation in St. Louis.

On Friday afternoon, a double-shot of Colemans seeking to become mayor threw what was supposed to be a tidy Democratic primary into disarray.

Just about an hour or so before outgoing State Sen. Maida Coleman, another Coleman — attorney Denise Watson-Wesley Coleman – threw her name into the contest.

Maida Coleman then abruptly took her name out of the running for the March primary, claiming that someone put the other Coleman in as ruse to confuse voters.

Instead, Coleman will seek to join the race as an independent, setting up a scenario where Maida could face Mayor Francis Slay in the April general election.

Over the weekend, both Slay and Watson-Wesley Coleman denied being involved in any political name games.

Meanwhile, the clock is running on Maida Coleman’s bid to file as a nonpartisan candidate. According to the Board of Elections, she has until Feb. 17 to submit the required 526 voter signatures to get her name on the ballot.

While it would be difficult for any candidate to win the mayor’s race without first getting the Democratic nomination, the attention generated by this surname flap could give Maida Coleman’s efforts an extra boost.

Either way, it could be the first time in years that the city saw a compelling match-up in the general election for mayor.

4 comments

Comments are closed.

So here’s how it’ll go down … Denise Watson-Wesley Coleman will get 35% against Slay in the primary. Maida Coleman will get 35% against Slay in the general. Then, some genius will say that means 70% of voters are opposed to Slay.

— Nick Kasoff
2:36 pm January 5th, 2009

Why do county people seem so afraid of Maida Coleman, and determined to support Slay? Nick, are you admitting that the two Colemans WILL confuse people? Smacks of desperation by the Slay camp.

— TFerguson
2:47 pm January 5th, 2009

Bull$%8@ Slay had nothing to do with Ms. Coleman the 2nd getting into the race. The democrats are masters at recruiting stalking horses. Slay knows the game. His fingerprints may not be on it but only a fool would deny his culpability.

What is funny is this: Senator Coleman probably played the other oldest trick. She got into the race with no shot of winning but hoped that someone would offer her a job to buy her out. Instead of playing ball, Slay played the stalking horse trick and power played Maida into political oblivion. Kinda funny, yet pathetic.

Someday we might get runoff voting. Then the voter will get real choices and the second Coleman can get back to minding her own business.

— County guy
9:45 pm January 5th, 2009

“it could be the first time in years that the city saw a compelling match-up in the general election for mayor.”

Wow, that might be the most negative thing ever written about Slay in the Post-Dispatch.

— AJS
9:03 am January 7th, 2009