Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
01.05.2009 5:10 pm

State-appointed attorneys: Governor’s office violated Sunshine Law

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

JEFFERSON CITY – A Cole County Circuit Court judge approved a settlement today between Gov. Matt Blunt and court-appointed attorneys that provides thousands of public documents that had been sought by state investigators.

The investigators were appointed last year by Attorney General Jay Nixon to determine whether the governor’s office violated Sunshine Law and state records retention policies.

The settlement agreement doesn’t allege any violations of law, but the two attorneys appointed by Judge Richard Callahan made it clear today they believe the governor’s office violated both Sunshine Law and records retention law multiple times.

They agreed to the settlement, attorneys Louis Leonatti and Joe Maxwell said, because the Supreme Court has set an “impossible” bar to prove a “knowing and purposeful” violation of Sunshine Law. Without meeting that standard, the two special assistant attorneys general couldn’t seek penalties such as $1,000 fines for each violation.

“It’s not that Gov. Blunt personally did anything wrong,” said Maxwell, “… it’s that they office of governor acted incorrectly under the law.”

Leonatti and Maxwell said the violations included not retaining e-mails, and not having a clearly defined records retention policy. “Over time, over that month (of September 2007), slowly they evolved,” Maxwell said. “They corrected their actions once they realized they were incorrect.”

During a court hearing that lasted more than two hours, attorneys for Blunt continued to contend that the governor and his staff did nothing wrong. They agreed to settle the case, said attorney John Holstein, in the interest of saving taxpayers’ money.

The lawsuit, and a separate civil lawsuit involving the fired former deputy counsel of the governor, Scott Eckersley, have cost taxpayers more than $1 million in attorneys fees.

UPDATE: The governor’s office, through spokeswoman Jessica Robinson, issued the following statement this afternoon:

“Once again after false accussation after false accusation the governor’s office has been proven correct with the approval of the governor’s dismissal from this political case. It is truly unfortunate that Jay Nixon’s e-mail team has wasted more than $600,000 of taxpayer money with nothing to show for it but false accusations.

“Nixon’s political operative Chet Pleban has lost in court every time he has made these false accusations against the governor’s office, and the assertions Lou Leonatti made today were obviously not persuasive.

“Once again Nixon’s e-mail team failed to show any evidence that the governor was not in compliance with the Sunshine Lae or that his office directed the destruction of e-mail backup tapes, which is why this absurd political case is ending with the dismissal of the governor and four falsely accussed public servants.”

13 comments

Comments are closed.

A million dollars for nothing, that was the end result of the suit and the settlement…what a waste of taxpayers money. And a misleading headline on the posting by Mr. Messenger, i.e., how can the ’state appointed attorneys say that there was a violation of the law’ when they themselves claim that it is ‘“impossible” to prove a “knowing and purposeful” violation of Sunshine Law’, in other words, they cannot prove there was any violation of the law. This entire fiasco was a witch hunt that resulted in nothing but an attempt to legally stain a publci official…it is shameful.

— red leader
5:24 pm January 5th, 2009

No, they proved there was a violation, just couldn’t prove that it was purposeful. Under your reasoning, it’s like saying if someone commits manslaughter instead of premediated murder, no one died. The governor’s office violated the law or they wouldn’t have settled. A settlement is not a dismissal, and hiding behind this ”we don’t want to spend taxpayer money” crap is not fooling anyone. Robinson’s statement makes the Gov look worse, not better, by so obviously mis-stating what the court did. If they weren’t doing anything wrong, they wouldn’t have changed the way they were doing things. I’m quite glad my tax dollars made the Gov’s office start doing the right thing. Thank goodness Blunt is almost gone, and Nixon, we expect you to follow the law too, so get it right from the beginning.

— gee thanks
7:19 pm January 5th, 2009

Gee thanks, your attempt at logic simply makes no sense…if they were guilty of anything, you can be sure the AG’s office would not have ’settled’ the case, they would have prosecuted. If they are not confident in their prosecution, they settle. Yes, it is not a dismissal, but nor is it a conviction; both sides agree to settle the case…did you get your law degree from a coimmunity college?

— gee thanks for nothing
7:44 pm January 5th, 2009

Where’s Sgt. Hulka when we need him. “Lighten up, Francis.”

— jjk
8:25 pm January 5th, 2009

Where did I say I have a law degree? Just flip your argument around–innocent people don’t settle, they go to trial, therefore the Gov must be guilty. Prosecutors settle all the time in order to get the conviction–and yes, settling counts as a conviction. How many murderers have “settled” so they can go to jail rather than the electric chair? They are still being found guilty of the crime and their criminal record shows it.

— gee thanks
10:17 pm January 5th, 2009

My God people where is the outrage? The P.D. and their Democrat allies are guilty of costing the state one million dollars for nothing. Did they find any E-Mails that proved pay to play as what was going on in Illinois?. Did they find any E-Mail that showed corruption was going on? Is anyone going to be indicted for criminal acts?. Or did they just get off by looking for dirty E-Mails?. This whole thing was just a political farce.

— Kenrick
2:54 am January 6th, 2009

It’s amusing to watch big deficit spending Republicans complain about a $150K investigation when they spent $80 million examining stains on a blue dress.

— Garrison
9:10 am January 6th, 2009

Kenny, let’s review: It’s not the Sunshine Guideline or the Sunshine Suggestion or the Sunshine Promise, it’s the Sunshine LAW. Blunt broke it. He’s the Governor. That’s why governors and other public officials have lawyers, so that they will be advised if they are about to do something stupid which will get them sued, thereby costing the state money. Blunt chose to fire Eckersley instead of listening to his apparently wise counsel. And, predictably, he got sued. That is the outrage.

— Penelope
9:32 am January 6th, 2009

It is absolutely not true that innocent people don’t settle. It happens every day. That’s the injustice of our justice system - that even to prove yourself innocent - it takes a lot of money - that you may not have. A settlement says what was agreed to and any consequences.

The bottom line is that the “special” AG’s didn’t have enough evidence that the law had been broken which specifically says “knowing and purposeful” - end of story. If there had been a “knowing and purposeful” presence - there would have been fines and convictions.

— jasonb
10:30 am January 6th, 2009

It cracks me up to hear innocent people don’t settle. I used to work for a large business in St. Louis and they paid people off all the time instead of going to court. Why? It was cheaper. Sure they could have fought every battle in court and probably won most of them, but you have you realize how much money they would have payed those attorneys doing the fighting in court. It just wasn’t worth it.

I liken it an argument with my wife. She said I was supposed to pick up milk on the way home even though she never mentioned it in the morning. I just said, “I’m sorry, you are right, I forgot, I’m going to go get milk now.” I was much easier that way. I could have pushed it and proven my point as we didn’t even see each other in the morning cuz I’m out the door before she gets up, but it just isn’t worth it.

Garrison get your crayon colored deficit chart updated cuz Obama is gonna have a few trillion dollar yearly deficits if he follows through on any of his proposals.

— Amazedbythelunacy
11:17 am January 6th, 2009

jjk writes: “Lighten up, Francis” — Great line! Ah, if they only made movies like Stripes these days!

— Tony Messenger
1:14 pm January 6th, 2009

False accusation after false accusation will not deter the reasonable juror from concluding that negative character assessments of Eckersley were anything but deliberate and intentionally misleading.

I know the media will champion any positive outcome from this debacle, but I am disappointed that Eckersley’s issue was forced to the sidelines while Nixon made headlines by wasting our money.

Maybe after his case is settled Scott should have a few words with the new Governor about fixing the SSLaw so that public priorities between privacy and transparency will be separated more distinctly.

— BOBZILLA
12:06 am January 7th, 2009

Garrison get your crayon colored deficit chart updated cuz Obama is gonna have a few trillion dollar yearly deficits if he follows through on any of his proposals.
— Amazedbythelunacy
11:17 am January 6th, 2009

he might…
but Obama will be inheriting a deficit of more than $1 trillion…
left over by the watchful eye of the free spending GOP and king george that was so callously given to the rich

— llbean
11:37 am January 7th, 2009