Sen. Justus speaks about ERA

Justus
JEFFERSON CITY — Sen. Jolie Justus, D-Kansas City, has sponsored a resolution that would urge the U.S. Congress to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment to the Constitution.
“It sends the message that Missouri doesn’t tolerate discrimination of any sort, that in Missouri men and women are equal,” Justus said to the Rules Committee today.
If the bill passed, Missouri would be the 36th out of 38 states necessary to ratify the amendment.
But the amendment might not be valid even if the required 38 states pass it. Congress passed a time limit – until 1982 – when they first passed the amendment.
Justus and Missouri Women’s Network Chairwoman Shirley Breeze said they hope that sunset will be overturned.
Sen. Gary Nodler, R-, said it would be more valid to start over than to try to ratify the old amendment.
Justus said the bill would move sex discrimination from medium to strict scrutiny.
This means that to defend against allegations of discrimination, the alleged discriminator would have to prove a compelling reason rather than a rational basis for the discrimination, Justus said.
This, she said, would put sex discrimination in line with racial and religious discrimination.
Justus said the bill would not affect abortion funding, gay marriage or other issues such as requiring men and women to use the same bathroom.
Several people from groups opposing abortion rights testified, however, to register their opposition of the bill on the groups that it could require states to “bolster the legal status of abortion,” as Susan Klein of Missouri Right to Life said.
The committee, which is composed of three men and two woman, did not vote on the amendment today.


First Robin Carnahan announces for Senate and now this from Jolie Justus. All we’re going to hear about for the next two years is a bunch of crap about GLBTG (Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender) issues.
Enough already!!
This is the best this senator can do? Dredge up a 35 year old failed amendment? I guess people losing their homes, jobs and savings are not high on her list. How pathetic.
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that ERA is officially dead because its time limit expired. (NOW v. Idaho, 459 U.S. 809, 1982) http://www.eagleforum.org/era/now-v-idaho.html
Also see St. Louis Post Dispatch Oct. 4, 1982
http://www.eagleforum.org/era/post-dispatch2.gif
Maybe with this amendment, men will be able to slaughter their children as freely as women can.