Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
05.14.2009 12:15 am

Watered down abortion bill passes Missouri Senate

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

JEFFERSON CITY – The Missouri Senate passed controversial abortion legislation early Thursday morning after lengthy negotiations that gutted the version of the bill that passed the House early this session.

Originally, the bill would have created the crime of coercing an abortion, but the version passed by the Senate merely strengthens the state’s existing informed consent laws. Even after negotiating a version of the bill that ended threats of a filibuster, Democrats Joan Bray of University City and Jolie Justus of Kansas City were unhappy with the bill, which adds new requirements to the 24-hour waiting period for abortions.

“A vote for this bill is a vote for the state to lie to these women in print,” said Bray. “I’m sick of women being treated like they’re so stupid that they can’t be responsible for their own reproductive decisions.”

The law requires a doctor or “qualified professional” to give women seeking an abortion various warnings of potential complications and a medical description of the procedure. An abortion clinic also must provide information about various services that might be available should women need aid, including information about adoption. The bill also offers the possibility of an ultrasound 24 hours before the abortion.

The bill passed the Senate 25-7 and now goes to the House for another vote. If the House accepts the Senate version, it will go to Gov. Jay Nixon for his signature.

Senators had objected to the original coercion language over the past couple of years because of concerns that it would criminalize behavior of doctors and parents who advised minor children concerning an unintended pregnancy.

“All of the criminal provisions have been removed from this bill,” said Sen. Rob Mayer, R-Dexter, who presented the bill in the Senate. “This legislation is intended to effectively protect unborn children and women from being wounded for life.”

The original bill was sponsored in the House by Republicans Cynthia Davis and Bryan Pratt.

No senators in favor of the bill spoke about it during the Senate debate, except for Mayer who described the deal when he approved it. But several Democrats who support abortion rights complained that if the Senate wanted to reduce abortions, it would pass bills that increase access to contraception and family planning.

“We are going to have fewer family planning visits from the women of Missouri,” said Justus.

The following senators voted no: Bray, Justus, Jeff Smith, Rita Days, Yvonne Wilson, Robin Wright-Jones, and Dan Clemens. Clemens, of Marshfield, was the only Republican to vote no.

Justus said the Democrats relented on filibustering the bill in part because Republicans had threatened to cut off debate to pass the more controversial elements of the bill. The bill includes a provision that allows the Planned Parenthood clinic in Columbia — one of two abortion clinics in the state — to have until 2012 to fulfill the requirements of the law.

Justus also said that Pratt has told her the House will pass the new version of the bill.

41 comments

Comments are closed.

If Bray is unhappy, I couldn’t be happier. Way to go, MO!

— Scott
1:02 am May 14th, 2009

Help keep the Missouri legislature out of my bedroom. I agree with Joan Bray. At this point, anyone who wants to bring children into this world, especially ones whose parents do not want them, and aren’t prepared to support them, IMO, has rocks in their head. Of course, the Missouri House has, over and over, proved this session that what isn’t rocks is hollow.

— Teresa
7:36 am May 14th, 2009

Teresa- what isn’t rocks– HUH?
I have mixed emotions about this whole thing

— stillsane
8:52 am May 14th, 2009

WTF!! Republicans beating on their bibles with their eyes closed to the point they are blind to all the problems facing this country and our state right now. Stop trying to force unwanted children into this world for the taxpayer to raise. Get your religion out of our government!!

— stchuckmom
8:55 am May 14th, 2009

Republicans keep trying to force people to have children that don’t want or can’t afford them. Then on the exact opposite side, Republicans do everything possible to limit the support for the poor mothers after the baby is born. Make up your minds! Either support them after they are born or stop forcing people to have them when they can’t afford them. Better yet, concentrate on improving the adoption laws and programs so the thousands of unwanted kids already out there can find homes. Use your head people!

— mrwestcounty
9:15 am May 14th, 2009

This is why I can’t say I’m a Republican an longer. I believe in being fiscally responsibe but that isn’t what Republicans fight for anymore. Just forcing their religion on the people without any real thought to what is good for the country. They represent only the church, not the people. Sad.

— stldoc
9:22 am May 14th, 2009

Congratulations Mr. Mayer. Makes me proud to call Dexter my adopted home town.

For the rest of you, the responsibility starts in the bedroom. Be responsible there and it’s not an issue. Teach your kids to keep their pants up and closed and stop placating them with idiocy.

— Charles
10:02 am May 14th, 2009

This girl was aborted. Unfortunate thing is, the abortionist was late to work, and she survived the saline abortion! Take this, Teresa. Oh wait, you think women should have the right to kill people like her… hm.

Meet Gianna Jessen, a liberal’s worst nightmare:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZVf_o1C2nI

— Scott
10:08 am May 14th, 2009

Wait, so it’s going to be a crime to “coerce an abortion,” but not to coerce women to have the baby?

— Faithful
10:09 am May 14th, 2009

Charles,

Thank you. Nice post.

Teach your children that unprotected sex is not ok and we will not have these issues. Stop making this a religion issue and make it a responsibility issue. If you do not want children, stop sleeping around and doing it unprotected. Sounds simple enough to me.

— Todd
10:12 am May 14th, 2009

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 » Show All