Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
06.29.2009 5:23 pm

Half-cent sales tax for Metro may be on April ballot in St. Louis County

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

St. Louis County voters are likely to see a half-cent sales tax to help subsidize Metro’s MetroLink and buses on the ballot next April.

The transit system’s supporters agreed about a month ago to bring back the tax that lost Nov. 4 and have begun working on a campaign.

“It will be a difficult, hard effort, a more challenging campaign,” Mike Jones, senior policy advisor to St. Louis County Executive Charlie Dooley, said today.

The deadline for the county council to put the proposal on the April 6 ballot is Jan. 26. But campaign work has to start early because of small turnouts in April elections, Jones said. The effort has to find supporters of the tax and get them to the polls to vote, he said.

“We have got to win. We have to overcome anything in the environment we can’t control,” Jones said.

The tax proposal is likely to be virtually the same as the one voters turned down on Nov. 4 – half the money would go to pay for operating the transit system and half the money for expanding MetroLink. The tax has been expected to raise $80 million a year.

The campaign will be in less favorable circumstances. Transit proposals do best on the same ballot as the president because of a large voter turnout. Local elections in April draw about 20 percent of the vote. Jones said the election has to be in April to avoid disrupting the transit system. State law prevents a return to the ballot of the 2008 proposal until this November whose voting day only is for special elections.

Metro responded to the tax defeat by reducing service on March 30 by about 33 percent. On Aug. 3, it will restore more than a third of the eliminated service using about about $20 million in federal money it got via federal and state sources. But, Jones said, that money runs out next May and without it, the transit agency would have to cut service again. An election in November, 2010 would be too late, he said.

The lack of money overshadows any concerns Dooley might have about being on the same ballot in August and probably November of next year as the tax proposal, Jones said.

The campaign for the tax will be different than the one last fall. Because of a large turnout, the tax campaign’s main task was to get its message out to persuade a majority of voters to vote yes. Last November, the tax was lost in north St. Louis County – the home of many transit riders and an area that has supported Metro in the past – because many voters turned a deaf ear to the campaign.

Next April, the campaign has to identify supporters and make sure they vote, Jones said.

Metro’s service cuts changed many people’s view of the problem, he said. The availability of service will be an issue when it was not in the past.

Before the vote, many people doubted Metro would make cuts. The agency “became adept at pulling rabbits out of the hat to keep the service going. People thought they were crying wolf,” Jones said. “Some groups that didn’t believe they would be affected found that they were,” he said.

Business people and administrators of institutions in outer areas of the county had problems because of their employees could not get to work, Jones said.

Tax supporters envision the campaign being overseen by a broad-based committee that would hire an expert to run the campaign. Among groups that have to be very active in the campaign are business people who need public transit for their workers, transit riders and business people who see public transit as an economic engine, he said.

Last fall, Dooley, the county executive, provided the leadership of the tax campaign. A member of his staff resigned to run the campaign. Dooley’s office was as close to the campaign as the county charter and campaign laws allowed, Jones said.

Jones estimated the campaign could cost $1 million – not only because of advertising expenses, but because of the cost of finding favorable voters and encouraging them to vote. And supporters have to raise the money when a slumping economy may dry up campaign donations.

For last November’s vote, the campaign had a budget of $850,000, but could raise only $650,000 – and the campaign had to scale back accordingly, Jones said.

15 comments

Comments are closed.

Dooley and Metro on the same ballot. I can’t wait. These people never learn. Once again, they prove to be pigs. They might be able to get a smaller fraction. A half cent is huge over the course of a year. Combine this with the increase in taxes for cap and tax, the healthcare reform taxes and loss of deductions and throw in ten percent unemployement and you just got to wonder how this thing can miss?

— jjk
5:43 pm June 29th, 2009

Yep, if you fail to get your way, put it on the ballot when few people will notice. Why don’t they just raise the rates and cut out inefficiencies like any other enterprise?

— Think|
7:27 pm June 29th, 2009

Boo hoo, they only had $650,000 to spend. Now, they are going to spend a million and try to shove it down our throats again.

Here’s an idea for campaign finance reform: For any referendum which would raise taxes, the opponents should get equal money. These jerks are going to have wall to wall television commercials and full color flyers, while opponents will be handing out xeroxed flyers they paid for out of their own pocket.

For the benefit of anyone at Metro who is actually listening, I will repeat a suggestion which you ignored last time: Split this proposition into two, 1/4 cent for operation, and 1/4 cent for expansion. I might actually vote for the operating levy, but expanding Metro is foolish, and if it is all in one proposition, I’ll be full force against it just like last time.

— Nick Kasoff
7:27 pm June 29th, 2009

Dooley leadership-tax campaign=failure at the polls. I am with you Nick. Split up the ballot measure into 2 parts, operation and expansion.

— Didymus
7:43 pm June 29th, 2009

Wow. Makes me proud to live in the City where legislative aldermen have to work with or against an executive branch mayor for the good of the people. Not where some 5 or 6 cronies oversee a vast population with little oversight.

— Ryan Russell
8:42 pm June 29th, 2009

What part of “NO” doesn’t Metro… and Dooley not understand?

— tsquare
9:05 pm June 29th, 2009

as a city resident who will see a tax increase in county voters pass it this time I will say I am supportive of this tax. I do not think I have been to a city the size of st. louis with a worse public transit then ours. It is a shame.

— Richard
10:38 pm June 29th, 2009

turn it down flat……..do you have any idea what this insane cap and trade legislation is going to cost everyone per year ? get ready for 400 dollar per month electic bills, 5 dollar per gallon fuel for your vehicles, and the loss of all manufacturing jobs…….ask yourself this question, would you open a business under the current conditions ? no tax increase for any reason, because we need to pay for health care, self inflicted tax, borrow and spend, and the bailouts………keep the powder dry folks, it gets bumpy from here………

— ksiefert48
6:28 am June 30th, 2009

Here we go again. GOOD. If this issue can get Dooley defeated, the better.

Again, supplement Metro by raising the gas tax a nickel a gallon. Don’t use public transportation, you pay for it at the pump.

— Underground_Mensa
7:56 am June 30th, 2009

We the people voted in a democratic, overspending, help the helpless president, we should be prepared for this and MANY more tax hikes. Live it and love it for another 3 years. Problem is, once they increase the tax, it NEVER goes back down. Just as we all have had to cut back, its time the Fed/State and Local governments need to do the same!!

— koalabear
12:11 pm June 30th, 2009

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All