Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
07.10.2009 5:41 pm

Census ruckus: Will ACORN be a factor?

Post-Dispatch Washington Bureau
  • Email this
  • Print this
Robert Groves

Robert Groves

UPDATED   WASHINGTON — Late afternoon on Monday, the Senate will take up a knotty problem that has slowed preparation for the 2010 Census — the stalled nomination of Robert Groves to head the Census Bureau.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., announced today that the Senate would hold a cloture vote seeking to break the logjam over Groves’ nomination caused by at least two Republican senators.

Groves, a former Census Bureau official and head of the University of Michigan’s Survey Research Center, is considered well-qualified to run the government’s head-counting office.

But Sens. David Vitter of Louisiana and Richard Shelby of Alabama, both Republicans, have raised concerns that he might deploy statistical sampling to get a better count of traditionally undercounted minorities. That would be unlawful, and Groves has promised to stick to traditional methods for next spring’s Census count.

What’s also been troubling to his critics is the concern that the White House would allow  ACORN (the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) to be involved in the Census when it rounds up hundreds of local groups to spread the word about the count.

To many Republicans, the very mention of ACORN is tantamount to waving a red sheet in front of an angry bull. The organization has been investigated in several states for voter registration fraud and an indictment was handed down in a St. Louis case earlier this year.  ACORN, which has been closely identified with the Democratic Party, contends it is the victim of partisan witchhunts.

(Glenn Burleigh, head organizer for ACORN in St. Louis, emailed after this post ran to say that the woman indicted “had worked for ACORN (but) she was fired. Later, she allegedly submitted false voter registration applications while working for Missouri Progressive Vote Coalition, not ACORN.”) 

A spokesman for Vitter told Roll Call newspaper in Washington this week that Vitter would continue his effort to block Groves until he had written confirmation from the White House that the former ACORN would not be involved in the Census.

Vitter’s office did not return our call today but his opposition may not matter if Democrats have enough GOP votes on Monday to move the nomination, which appears quite possible given Groves’ bipartisan backing in the Senate Homeland Security Committee.

That would be a good thing, said Rep. William Lacy Clay, D-St. Louis, who heads the House subcommittee that oversees the Census.

“We’re hearing positive signs from the Senate,” Clay said.

Next year’s Census is a big deal for Missouri, Clay noted, because of the potential of losing a congressional seat because of dwindling population.

The 2010 Census likely will be the most difficult ever due to population shifts, home foreclosures and disasters such as Hurricane Katrina which uprooted many families. The Government Accountability Office has been criticial of preparations and Clay believes that having a permanent director will help the government get ready.

“They’ve been run by a committee over there. It’s probably a good method but you need to have permanent leadership like Dr. Groves,” Clay said.

12 comments

Comments are closed.

ACORN, COI, different name, same group. If you watch Glenn Beck:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3e0ty5lV_Zk
There are a number of videos you can google. These people wrote the book on voter fraud and it is heavily funded by the government. They are a bunch of crooks and won’t let anyone look at their books or answer any questions about their political work and they are a tax-free entity.

— A CENTRIST
6:09 pm July 10th, 2009

With respect to Mr. Lambrecht and Mr. Centrist, ACORN has not changed its name. ACORN International, a wholly separate corporate entity, and one which has no relationship whatsoever to ACORN now that it has no ties to its founder, Wade Rathke, has changed its named to Community Organizing International. Those who consistently conflate all allegations against ACORN–however exaggerated of false they may be–into one lump conspiracy against everything they hold dear, usually don’t want to be confused with the facts. Mr. Lambrecht, as a journalist rather than as a partisan, would do well to check the facts more closely himself before repeating allegations whose truth exists only in the far-right reaches of the blogosphere, or in the minds of elected officials–Michelle Bachmann, for instance–who believe they are waging a Holy War not only against ACORN, but also against a significant percentage of their fellow Americans whose political and social beliefs don’t gibe with their own.

Many of us are waiting to hear the Republicans say why the American people should give them any credence or their votes, rather than hear them bray, ad nauseum, that the Democrats, and their imagined proxies like ACORN, represent all that is worst–even godless–in American culture. Joe McCarthy is having a good laugh from the grave.

— Pat McCoy
8:15 pm July 10th, 2009

A CENTRIST,

Just a tip: Don’t cite Glenn Beck if you would like to be taken seriously.

— NEMO
8:35 pm July 10th, 2009

I have my concerns about ACORN, but all I know is what I have read. I do have a personal story about questionable voter registration activities that may or may not be attributed to ACORN: In 2000, my brother-in-law (who was serving two years of parole of a seven-year prison sentence) was living with my wife and I. He asked if we had registered him to vote, because he’d received an election notice. This was strange because (I thought) convicted felons lost their voting privileges and nobody we knew had registered him. Election day came and he proudly cast his ballot for George W. Bush. (If ACORN or another “community organization” had signed up this presumptive Democratic voter, it backfired that time. )

— Joe L.
10:10 am July 11th, 2009

ACORN is linked to so many criminal investigations that it’s ridiculous to consider them for this politically sensitive activity. They are inarguably partisan (see here for a good article on the topic http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2009/05/acorn-internal-memo-blows-cover-off-its.html ) using their own internal memos as evidence!

— Fred Falls
5:01 pm July 11th, 2009

Joe L. Only Kentucky and Virginia have life long denial of voting rights for convicted felons.

— slamfist
5:13 pm July 11th, 2009

NEMO - Why? Does the truth scare you?

— A CENTRIST
5:48 pm July 11th, 2009

No matter what, this census will be a political quagmire. I would like to see more coverage of the pre-census activity. Teams are verifying physical addresses now, and keying them into blackberries, mapping it all out on G.P.S. Doesn’t the U.S. Post Office already have this information?
This is not hearsay. My parents are in an assisted living center, and were told not to worry about the people walking about. A client of mine has a friend involved in doing this work.
So, hey local newspaper? What’s the story?

— CHUCKtheFED
10:19 am July 12th, 2009

In a recent election, I was a candidate, and did a lot of walking around based on a list of people who voted last November. In several cases, people voted from addresses which did not exist. Not enough to have made any difference in the election, but it did happen. This isn’t something I heard on Rush Limbaugh, I saw it with my own eyes. When I called the board of elections, they said they’d look into it … and ultimately, they said while they were sure it was a legitimate voter, they must have entered the address incorrectly. I guess when it comes to elections, “close enough” is good enough. I’m just glad government workers aren’t in charge of my healthcare.

— Nick Kasoff
8:54 pm July 12th, 2009

I am not certain about other states but here in Kansas convicted felons must be off parole or probation before they can register to vote. If they do register to vote while on parole or probation it is a federal crime that can get them up to 17 more months in prison. Finding a DA in Kansas that would file against them is near to impossible.

— navyvet48
2:29 am July 13th, 2009

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All