Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
07.02.2009 1:52 pm

Gov. Jay Nixon says helmets will still be required in Missouri

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

JEFFERSON CITY — Gov. Jay Nixon said today that he will veto a bill that would have repealed Missouri’s helmet law for motorcyclists, keeping in place a law safety advocates say saves lives.

Motorcycle enthusiasts have been trying to repeal the mandatory helmet law for a couple of decades, and this is the second time the Legislature agreed with them. In 1993, then-Gov. Mel Carnahan vetoed a similar repeal.

Lawmakers argued that it was a freedom issue, siding with cyclists who find the helmets stifling and unnecessary.

Pete Rahn, Missouri’s director of the department of transportation, had been lobbying Nixon hard to veto the bill. In a news conference last month, Rahn pointed to a survey that said Missourians overwhelmingly want motorcyclists to wear helmets. Rahn said repealing the law will lead to deaths, based on highway statistics that show riders without helmets are more likely to die.

Until today, Nixon had been mostly silent on the issue. He disagreed with advocates for the law who said that the governor had given them assurances he would sign it. And he chided Rahn for spending public money on a lobbying effort. Rahn’s actions caused Nixon to veto $33,000 in MoDOT’s budget, the same amount of federal money the transportation department had spent on the survey.

In the end, though, Nixon ended up on Rahn’s side.

“In terms of lives and of dollars, the cost of repealing Missouri’s helmet law simply would have been too high,” Gov. Nixon said. “By keeping Missouri’s helmet law intact, we will save numerous lives, while also saving Missouri taxpayers millions of dollars in increased health care costs. Keeping our helmet law in place was the safe and cost-effective choice for Missouri.”

50 comments

Comments are closed.

Seatbelts, helmets, what’s next comrade? Oh yeah, smoking. Can’t wait until salt and fat are banned as well.

— Steve
2:07 pm July 2nd, 2009

Good veto. I also find seat belts confining but I wear them in my car, and I wear my helmet while motorcycling. It’s nice to see reason prevail over political expediency.

— Clyde Farris
2:09 pm July 2nd, 2009

Thank you governor for making sure I’m safe. I hope there are cops in my yard making sure I wear steel toe boots when mowing my lawn too.

— rider
2:13 pm July 2nd, 2009

Good. If they’re going to have seat belt laws, it only makes sense there should be helmet laws as well.

— TheTruth
2:16 pm July 2nd, 2009

I have been riding my harley around with no helmet for about a month now. Some cop told me that i need to be wearing a helmet. I told him a law passed saying that we don’t need one anymore. That stumped him. Now, good ole Jay is telling me I need to wear one. I’ll tell you what Jay, I’ll take the $25 ticket IF i get pulled over.

— cophater69
2:17 pm July 2nd, 2009

C’mon Steve…they’ll never BAN salt and fat. They’ll be rationed by The Party.

— Thomas Jefferson's Surviving Twin
2:17 pm July 2nd, 2009

Once again Nixon is living in the land of oz…Nixon it’s pronounced “Missour’ee” and it where people should have to right to ride freely. Might be a hard election come 2012 based on his out state policies.

— Tommy
2:17 pm July 2nd, 2009

I am sick to my stomach over this! Doesn’t the government dictate enough of what we can and cant do! Its sad that a bunch of people who have never been on a motorcycle have the power to force their will on others. Instead of singling out bikers why dont we worry about all the idots on the highway talking and texting on their cell phones! I bet any amount of money that they will cause a traffic accident quicker than me not wearing a helmet! I guess its just the world we live in………PEOPLE ALWAYS BEING WORRIED ABOUT SOMETHING THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THEM! So I will keep wearing my helmet and you keep talking on your phone in rush hour traffic like a a**hole!

— Brian
2:19 pm July 2nd, 2009

All you tough guys who are dumb enough to ride your bike without a helmet, I hope you like eating through a tube and riding a around in a wheelchair. As you well know, it usually not the bike rider that causes the devastating injury or death, it is another driver. Wear your helmets (good helmets not those skull cap pieces of crap) and live a long and happy life. Someone who knows.

— dryan26233
2:24 pm July 2nd, 2009

I think it is idiotic if a person doesn’t wear a seatbelt or a helmet while operating a vehicle or a bike. I also think that it is completely up to each individual person to decide whether or not they want to wear one (over 18 I might add, kids should be required because they can’t make that decision intelligently). If someone dies because they didn’t use the safety gear, that has no affect on me. The government has no right to tell you to do something, like putting on a helmet, if not doing it has no affect on the rights of others.

— Tim
2:26 pm July 2nd, 2009

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 » Show All