Lambert incident leads to revised TSA screening rules
WASHINGTON — Transportation Security Administration screeners at Lambert-St. Louis International Airport probably wish that the fellow they chose to grill last March about a box of cash wasn’t a Ron Paul devotee who runs a committee devoted to individual rights and constitutional government.
But grill Steven Bierfeldt they did, and eight months later the incident has yielded revised rules requiring TSA agents to stick to matters related to flight security rather than policing airports for other crimes.
Bierfeldt and the American Civil Liberties Union, which represented him in a lawsuit, announced yesterday in a news release that the TSA had changed its rules in response to the litigation.
“It’s a huge victory for civil liberties that TSA agents no longer have free reign to conduct sweeping, baseless searches and detain passengers who don’t pose a threat to flight safety,” Bierfeldt said in a statement.
Bierfeldt said that he was ushered to a small room and questioned after passing a metal box containing $4,700 through a Lambert screening checkpoint. He said the cash related to his job as director of development for the Campaign for Liberty, a lobbying group that sprouted from the presidential campaign last year of Rep. Ron Paul, the Libertarian-Republican from Texas.
(Paul is scheduled to return Friday for an appearance in Iowa, where quadrennial precinct caucuses open the presidential election campaign season.)
Bierfeldt said that he was interrogated for a half-hour in an increasingly threatening manner and told that he was being placed under arrest. He recorded audio of the episode on his iPhone.
Bierfeldt’s suit contended that the TSA’s pre-flight screening should be aimed at keeping weapons and explosives off airplanes. Before it was due to be heard in September, the ACLU said the TSA issued a policy directive stating that “screening may not be conducted to detect evidence of crimes unrelated to transportation security.”
The government agency responded in October with a second directive pointing out that transporting large amounts of cash is not illegal, the release said. The ACLU added that it is taking steps to drop the suit on Bierfeldt’s behalf.
TSA was closed on this federal holiday and had not responded yet to a call seeking comment. A TSA blog post last spring defended the questioning but concluded that “language used by the TSA employee was inappropriate.”
A later blog post referring to “the St. Louis incident” says that “the tone and language used by the TSA employee was inappropriate and proper disciplinary action was taken.”


Many thanks to Mr. Bierfeldt and the ACLU for keeping the TSA in line.
Have you met a TSA screener? The last thing they should be involved in is detective work. Just chuck the water bottles and leave us alone.
hooray for LIBERTY!!!
What is the perception of the ACLU-haters on this? Should they butt out?
As a frequent flyer, I loathe the TSA. Give peons a little bit of power and they run amok like this.
Larry - Amen.
I think an incident like this will bring together folks from both parties, from all walks of life, all races, and religions.
Thank you ACLU and Bierfeldt. This desperately need some attention.
I really don’t understand why every infraction of a governmental employee is an opportunity for someone to tout unity and to sing “can’t we all get along?” The bringing together of people from opposite sides isn’t always a good thing - look at the Left bank in Israel for an example. Unity only breads complacency. It was through the adversarial process that the ACLU was able to affect any kind of useful change in this instance.
You cannot proclaim how wonderful diversity is in the same thought that you clamor for unity - the two operating theories fight.
We fly out of here several times a year. Enough times that I bet I know which a$$ did this. He “sniffed” our shoes cell phones and my wife’s bras for explosives when he spotted a missed bic lighter in the luggage. I personally know an individual who flunked the profile test for several law enforcement and other public safety positions. Yep, you guessed it, TSA took the idiot. Just remember when you’re dealing with TSA, they potentially are rejects that other agencies deemed mentally unfit for service. It is about time that we were getting some of our civil rights back.
Maybe it’s just me, but does $4700 qualify as a “large amount of cash” in this day and age???