Would GOP sweep tomorrow be the start of something big?
WASHINGTON — Maybe, which is why political junkies in places with red-hot races next year — like Missouri and Illinois — will be examining results from three contests tomorrow as a guide for 2010.
There are favorable trends beyond history for Republicans heading into the mid-term elections. And they could show up in Tuesday’s gubernatorial elections in Virginia and New Jersey and in a House special election in New York that has drawn wide attention because of the success of Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman.
Easiest to predict is Virginia’s election for governor, where Republican and ex-state attorney general Bob McDonnell looks on the verge of wiping out state Sen. Creigh Deeds, judging by his double-digit lead in polls. Virginia, of course, is one of traditional GOP states that voted for Barack Obama in 2008.
In New Jersey, the race between Gov. Jon Corzine and ex-U.S. Attorney Chris Christie is tougher to call given polls showing them running close. But pollsters note that it’s rare when governors win re-election with such high unfavorable ratings (Corzine’s is over 50 percent) and voters in a foul mood.
The New York election has received loads of attention (and money) from across the country and took a weird turn over the weekend when Dede Scozzafava, the moderate Republican who had drawn the wrath of right-leaning candidates across the land (including Missouri), dropped out and threw her support to the Democrat in the race, Bill Owens. Vice President Joe Biden heads to New York today in hopes of giving Owens a boost.
So what would a victory by the Conservative Party’s Hoffman mean? That conservatives are back after predictions that their Reagan-inspired movement had run its course? Or perhaps that Republicans can wind up in disarray when the GOP’s angry fringe rises up?
Two of Washington’s top pollsters, one Republican and one Democrat, talked with reporters this morning about how they’re viewing Tuesday’s elections.
To Bill McInturff, who has polled for Sen. John McCain and dozens of other Republicans, a key finding in polls heading into tomorrow’s votes is the intensity of Republican voters — fueled by concerns about government spending and Democrat-proposed health-care reform.
“What it looks like so far is that without President Obama on the ballot, Democrats are having a difficult time marshaling energy,” he added.
McInturff predicted that Republican successes tomorrow would enter into the thinking of Democratic moderates in Congress, who are being asked by Obama to cast tough votes on health reform, climate change legislation and perhaps immigration.
“There are only so many profiles-in-courage votes you can make if you’re a Blue Dog Democrat,” he said.
McInturff said that Tuesday’s results also could help shape of next year’s elections. “If tomorrow goes well for Republicans, it will have an enormous impact on candidate recruitment and money,” he said.
Mark Mellman, a pollster for many prominent Democrats, asserted that what Republicans are seeing now could mean trouble down the line if GOP candidates are pushed to adopt positions out of step with the public.
Mellman said his party understands that times have changed since the last two elections when Democrats captured the White House and more than 50 seats in the House. He noted that just two governors in recent times have won re-election with the likes of Corzine’s dismal job ratings. (One of them was former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich, who was drummed out of office after winning a second term.)
“It’s going to be a different cycle for us. But that’s the ebb and flow of politics,” he said. “There is going to be a certain amount of despair and soul-searching partly because of overly broad generalizations in the media.”


If the GOP wins big tomorrow, it will not be the start of something big. It will just be a continuation of the yin and the yang of politics where the two corrupt parties take turns screwing up our country and spending us into oblivion.
> Mark Mellman, a pollster for many prominent Democrats, asserted that what
> Republicans are seeing now could mean trouble down the line if GOP candidates
> are pushed to adopt positions out of step with the public.
Would that be positions like spending trillions of dollars on bailout schemes so numerous it’s impossible to keep them all straight, taking over the auto industry, regulating the pay of corporate executives, and taking control of the healthcare industry? Judging by the angry reaction from the public at town hall meetings and rallies across the nation, it isn’t Doug Hoffman who is out of step.
Well folks there you have it… the press release from the DNC… ‘that’s the ebb and flow of politics’
This is a revolt against the far left policies of both parties but 95% of that is Obama and the Democrats.
Now, the Democrats could stop this… or slow it down a bit… but they won’t… they want their take over of the health care industry and they want to spend to reward their masters on the left… the LW nuts and the labor thugs.
The Democrats will ‘die’ on their spending and health care bill.
Obama still polls near 70% approval in Virginia, so that state means nothing.
In Jersey, Corzine has his problems completely unrelated to anything Obama says or does.
In NY, that district hasn’t had a Democratic member since 1856.
Bill, this is much ado about nothing!
More silly season spinning from the GOP and the mainstream media.
–The revolution/tidal wave of voter unrest, symbolized by the ‘Tea Party Express’, aimed at ALL out of touch legislators is just begun.
–Wouldn’t surprise me if No incumbents get re-elected, or if a whole new ‘Conservative Party’ is born out of the legislative-madness-associated dementia.
Hogey,
–Speaking of dementia, you would be interested in this.
“Had Enough? Vote Democrat” was a great, and evidently effective, slogan for the D’s in 2006 and 2008, but it’s not much of a battle cry when you’re the party in power (as the D’s now are in the United States of America, although not in most Southern States, such as Missouri).
The professional right wing organizers have plenty of legitimate gripes with which to motivate a quasi-populist backlash against President Obama, although attacking him as a “socialist” when his most unpopular program is the Wall Street Bailout (exactly the policy the decidedly un-socialist George W. Bush pursued) that has resulted in yet another transfer of wealth from the working class to the CEOs and other 21st Century “robber barons” lacks any logical foundation and demonstrates an embarrassing lack of knowledge of political history.
But so what? Neither party makes any consistent effort to communicate with voters in anything resembling the hard truth, and in those rare instances when they actually do, they are rewarded with defeat at the polls.