Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
12.03.2008 1:59 pm

Young Blues, big expectations

  • Email this
  • Print this

THE WATERCOOLER
(Post-Dispatch columnists and beat writers share their thoughts on a question of the day.)

Question: If you had to choose among the Blues’ three young forwards — David Perron, T.J. Oshie and Patrik Berglund — who do you think is most likely to become a consistent 30-goal scorer in the NHL and why?

BERNIE MIKLASZ
I’ll go with Perron. The kid seems to have an innate feel for the puck, and a real instinct for finding the open spaces. He’s slippery, and he’s clever and he plays with a bit of an edge. He has good hands. The goals will come. It’s just a matter of time. And once he starts pumping those goals in, we’ll see a lot of ’em.

TOM TIMMERMANN
Give me Oshie. I see Perron leveling off somewhere below 30 goals, in part because his skills will be directed elsewhere. Berglund may help other guys get 30 goals, but he won’t get ’em himself. Oshie, meanwhile, will scrap in front of the net, where there are goals to be found and he’s quick enough to make goals happen elsewhere.

JEREMY RUTHERFORD
All three players have 30-goal potential, but I like Perron’s chances best. Perron scored 39 goals in 70 games in the Quebec Major Junior Hockey League two years ago, and Berglund put up 21 goals in 35 games and 21 goals in 36 games in back-to-back seasons in Sweden. Typically when you’re a goal scorer in hockey, you find ways to score at every level, and once Perron adjusts to the NHL, he’ll find a way. Berglund will score at this level, too, but playing center, he has more dirty work than Perron in the defensive end, and offensively I see Berglund as more of a play-maker. Oshie might be as fun a player as there is to watch, but he wasn’t a prolific scorer in college. He had 24 goals in 43 games as a freshman at the University of North Dakota, but then dipped to 17 and 18 his next two seasons. Oshie has so much energy and wants so badly to hit everything that moves that his No. 1 focus isn’t scoring. Perron has the skill-set and the improving strength to be a 30-goal guy in the NHL more consistently than the others.

DAN O’NEILL
First, I must take issue with the notion that we can predict a “consistent 30-goal scorer.” In their 41-season history, only eight players have scored 30 goals or more in a Blues uniform as many as three seasons in succession. But because it is a mandate, and because Bernie Parent has retired, I suggest Oshie is the most likely to reach that kind of production. He has the skill to score pretty goals and the grit to score ugly. He appears to be a slightly inflated version of Theo Fleury.

EDITOR’S NOTE: Since none of the writers chose Berglund, I’ve gotta chime in (maybe because I’ve got him on my fantasy team, maybe not.) Though he lacks the flash of Perron or the pure grit of Oshie, I think Berglund has the kind of understated European goal-scoring ability that could lead to him putting up “quiet” 30-goal seasons somewhat consistently. I like all three of the Blues youngsters, but for upside scoring I’d go with Berglund.

****

MIDDAY NEWS AND THOUGHTS

GOOD LUCK WITH THAT: Pitcher Mike Hampton will return to the NL Central after signing a one-year deal with the Houston Astros. Does that scare you, Cardinal fans? Does it? Didn’t think so. Hampton’s biggest claim to fame is parlaying one 20-win season with the Astros (followed by a 15-win year with the Mets) into an eight-year, $121 million contract with the Colorado Rockies … then winning just 56 games over the life of that contract while with the Rockies and Braves. That means Hampton got paid just over $2.1 million per victory in that period. I’m thinking righthanded hitters will go long often against the lefty given the short porch in left at Minute Maid … assuming Hampton’s even playing. Remember he missed the 2006 and 2007 seasons following elbow operations and the first four months of last season with a torn pectoral muscle. Houston, you may have a problem.

BEER, BEER, BEER FOR OLD NOTRE DAME: That’s got to be the sentiment around South Bend after it was officially announced today that head coach Charlie Weis will be back for another year. This despite the fact that in his first four years Weis has compiled a 28-21 record and a .571 winning percentage, the worst since Gerry Faust led the Irish to a 30-26-1 mark (.535) from 1981-85. Wonder why Weis’ predecessor Tyrone Willingham didn’t get the same considerations after going 21-15 (.583) in his first three seasons? Think it has something to do with the 10-year contract extension Weis signed after his initial success at Notre Dame and the encumberances that a buyout could entail? Sorry, Irish fans, I guess it’s not over ’ til the Fat Man Cha-Chings at least one more year at Notre Dame. (Read Chicago Tribune columnist Steve Rosenbloom teeing off on the decision.)

****

JUST A FEW THINGS TO PONDER

ANTI-DOPING? HOW ABOUT ANTI-CARING: Six players in the NFL were suspended yesterday on suspicion of violating the league’s anti-doping policy. YAWN. Please wake me when the Steroid Era and everything that goes with it has passed. The only kind of talk I care about anymore in relation to “performance enhancers” is how the Rams might put a better product on the field or how the Cards can avoid losing leads in the late innings. Now there’s a performance-enhancing topic I think we can all agree on.

BUT THAT REMINDS ME: Why does any talk of Mark McGwire in any context bring out such raw emotions in St. Louis? There seems to be absolutely no middle ground. Either folks love him for his Summer of Love home-run fest and will never admit he did anything wrong, or folks hate him because they feel he cheated them and that he’s a fraud. At what point will one side take its head out of the sand and the other side admit McGwire was simply a product of his era? If you really need a villain in this whole saga, why not just blame those “female” East German athletes from back in the ’70s … Lord knows what many of them could have done with a bat in their hands at Coors Field.

AH, THERE’S ALWAYS THE CUBS: OK, I’ll admit this item is a week old, but any chance to poke fun at the Chicago Cubs’ historic playoff crashes seems to entertain our readers. So in case you Cardinals fans out there have not seen it, I thought you might like The Onion’s report on a contract agreement that stipulates the Cubs will not be going to the World Series for at least four more years, with an option for a six-year extension.

****

STAT OF THE DAY

ZERO — Winning seasons by the St. Louis Rams since Mad Mike Martz was run out of town on rails after the 2005 season. Martz’s record as Rams head coach was 56-36, good enough for a .609 winning percentage.

4 comments

Comments are closed.

I’ll take Osh as well. Perron can stick handle, but gets knocked off his skates way to many times. Bergy is a timid European who hasn’t shown he’ll get physical and dirty. I guess if you want to throw out stats that are in the past. I’ll add some: Oshie had 142 pts in 128 games at UND(Playing bigger/older/strong teams). Or you could look at his Junior year ‘04 at Warroad where he played 25 games scoring 37 goals with 33 assists for 70 points. Or his senior year ‘05: 31games 37goals-63assists-100pts(Looks like he can score goals too)

— BrettB
2:44 pm December 3rd, 2008

Perron has the best chance to be the pure point producer, does that mean 30 goals? It does if he reaches his full “boom” potential. IMO he is a 25g (fluxing up to 30-35) 50+a guy. Kariya but stronger on the boards and harder to take off the puck.

Oshie will be this teams best all around player in the near future. 25 conistent goals yes, 30 no.

Berglund is teh best bet IMO. He plays the pivot and at least for now projects to be our future #1 Center. That means lots of PP time and plenty of good chances. He has everything Perron has (mayenot as slick w/ teh puck) but has the size needed to bang in the dirty areas better than Perron, which will get him more goals.

— Rodimus Prime
2:58 pm December 3rd, 2008

Better question would have been which forward do you draft first? I’d think Oshie because he seems to be a heart and soul Selke/Captain candidate with offensive skills. However, a big strong pivot like Berglund is extremely rare and Perron as stated in the article seems to have the highest offensive upside.

— dvdvrhs
3:31 pm December 3rd, 2008

I’ll say Berglund. He’s already proving to have more of a finishing touch than the others and he’s played just a handful of games. I think as his big body develops more we’ll see him getting more close in garbage goals as well and learning to muscle through to the net.

I think Perron has the skill to score, but he’s becoming more of a playmaker. I don’t see that changing unless he gets consistently paired with a pure passer.

Oshie seems to be a gritter two-way player, but I doubt he will become more than a 25-goal scorer. Besides, O’Neill picked Oshie and I never agree with what O’Neill has to say about hockey.

— Pagan
3:53 pm December 3rd, 2008