Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
01.08.2009 12:16 pm

Red Sox feast on low-hanging fruit

  • Email this
  • Print this

TODAY’S TOP STORIES

KNOWING A BARGAIN WHEN YOU SEE ONE: “Good stuff cheap” read’s the Boston Globe’s online headline this morning. This after the announcement that the Red Sox have reached a preliminary agreement with future Hall of Fame starter/closer John Smoltz on a one-year, $5 million deal. According to the report, Smoltz, 41, will finalize the deal later today and can earn another $5 million in performance incentives.

Oh, and the Red Sox also picked up former first-round pick Rocco Baldelli in a one-year, performance-laden deal.

You think of the big, bad Red Sox as a free-wheeling, free-spending organization, but after missing out in the Mark Teixeira sweepstakes the Bosox have acted with financial prudence, taking shots on guys who have exceeded at the highest level, and doing so at discount prices that only escalate based on actual performance.

You may recall the Red Sox already have signed former Dodgers ace Brad Penny to a one-year, $5 million deal. That escalates to the neighborhood of $8 million with performance incentives.

Both Smoltz and Penny had some injury issues last season, but both also have shown the ability to perform at an extemely high level when healthy, Smoltz in a Cooperstown-sort-of-way. The Sox have invested $10 million guaranteed that the two can help them push toward another World Series. And if they don’t perform, Boston can walk away after one year and not be bogged down by long-term contracts.

Both examples, to me, seem exactly the kind of deal the Cardinals have indicated they are looking for. Smoltz, in particular, meets the characteristics of the kind of player described by manager Tony La Russa just last week that he’d like to have — someone with starting and closing experience. Alas, the Cardinals remain on the sidelines.

Perhaps the Cards are doing the right thing by remaining patient as the market for pitchers sets itself. Then again, you don’t want patience to turn into paralysis.

IN OTHER BASEBALL NEWS: The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel is reporting today that the Brewers have signed all-time saves leader Trevor Hoffman to a one-year, $6 million deal. Hoffman can earn an addition $1.5 million in incentives, based on games finished, according to the report. So scratch Hoffman off the list. You can read what the Journal-Sentinel and Milwaukee fans have to say at the blog site highlighted above.

****

THE WATERCOOLER

QUESTION: Who will win tonight’s BCS Championship game between Florida and Oklahoma and what will be the final score?

VAHE GREGORIAN
Florida “holds” Oklahoma four touchdowns below what it’s been scoring in the second half of the season but can’t quite stop the Sooners.
Oklahoma 35, Florida 28

STU DURANDO
The SEC doesn’t lose in the championship game. I’m sick of the SEC but until it loses I can’t pick against any of its teams. However, this game is completely anti-climactic to me. The BCS folks have made this an afterthought by playing on a Thursday night, a week after New Year’s Day. I feel more like I’m about to watch a great season opener for 2009.
Florida 37, Oklahoma 30

JOE STRAUSS
If money grew on trees, this is what handicappers would refer to as “low-hanging money.” As the bowl season has screamed: The SEC is big league, the Big 12 is 4-A. Teams that don’t play defense don’t hang against SEC big boys. Ask Texas Tech. Oklahoma has an underrated defense — within the Big 12. A late score makes this one deceptively close.
Florida 38, Oklahoma 32. (Give the points.)

TOM TIMMERMANN
I saw a lot more of Oklahoma this year than I did Florida, which has probably colored my thinking that the Sooners are better. I’m counting on Oklahoma’s defense to make the plays needed for the win.
Oklahoma 28, Florida 27

CAMERON HOLLWAY
Tonight’s game is no more a “championship” than Utah-Alabama, USC-Penn State or Texas-Ohio State. Utah is the national champion, and USC, Texas and tonight’s winner belong in the conversation. I picked Oklahoma to be crowned in the preseason, so I’ll have to stick with that pick. The Sooners offensive line might be the best in NCAA history, which gives Sam Bradford the time to pick any defense apart.
Oklahoma 34, Florida 31.

REID LAYMANCE
The Sooners’ only loss this season came against Texas, a team with a gritty QB (Colt McCoy) and a good kick returner (Jordan Shipley). Florida has that and maybe a bit more in Tim Tebow and Percy Harvin.
Florida 35, Oklahoma 33

PRESEASON PREDICTIONS: Everyone’s got a 50-50 chance at getting the above question right. How hard is that? The really challenge was picking the national champion before the season began. Take a look at who our college football writers, columnists and college editor said would win it all in our preseason preview.

****

QUESTION TO THE READERS

MACLIN A MIZZOU GREAT? On the eve of Jeremy Maclin announcing his decision between the NFL and staying in school, I got to wondering about where he would rank with all-time Mizzou football greats. I didn’t grow up here so I don’t have a great historical perspective as far as seeing guys play. I know what my eyes tell me about Maclin: He’s an incredibly talented athlete who glides so smoothly while juking opponents it often seems he’s doing it effortlessly. If he goes pro now, does he hurt his legacy among Mizzou greats, or perhaps not even be considered one? Or has he already put himself in the upper-tier in the schools annals? Educate me on this one.

****

STAT OF THE DAY

7,354.2 — Career innings pitched by Cy Young, the most in Major League history. That averages out to about 334 innings pitched per season in his 22-year career. Pretty amazing, huh?

12 comments

Comments are closed.

Wow…So the Cardinals could have had Penny and Smoltz for about $10 mil? Mo must really be lighting up the phones trying to find deals. Do your job Mo.

— Brave Cardinal
1:07 pm January 8th, 2009

What happened to the idea that Smoltz was a sure bet to go back with the Braves? The Cards must have been standing under the wrong tree to miss out on this low hanging fruit or they did’nt bother to labor for it when the BoSox came along and picked it.

— DAVID COBLE
1:14 pm January 8th, 2009

Hope Strauss has to eat his words. So sick of his yapping about the SEC. He ought to stick to baseball.

— Dean
1:15 pm January 8th, 2009

Strauss says: “As the bowl season has screamed: The SEC is big league, the Big 12 is 4-A. Teams that don’t play defense don’t hang against SEC big boys.”

Um yeah…the SEC runner-up Alabama sure proved the SEC is the “big league.” Joe, stick to whatever it is you do other then college football b/c you’ve proven yourself to be clueless time and time again.

— secsucks
1:39 pm January 8th, 2009

Have gone from taking a chance on Matt Clement, optimism on Mark Mulder’s rehab, to taking passes on Brad Penny and John Smoltz. Give the benefit of the doubt on this one, maybe they did a 180 on signing pitchers marred by previous injuries.

— Michael Scriven
1:40 pm January 8th, 2009

Penny and Smoltz have a history of injury. Ownership has Mo’s (you know what) in a vice grip with getting injured pitchers. Same with Ben Sheets, maybe.

I think this team needs one more inning eater (Suppan-esque) and this team could really do some damage.

I am not giving Mo a free pass here, but he put together (along with LaRussa’s managing) a team that could have won the central. Who new that Izzy would implode. Who new that Wainwright would be hurt for half the season.

I feel this team’s going to be exciting. They need one or two more pieces, but nothing huge.

Maybe you people should start supporting the Cubs. A lot of good their spending has gotten them. Or the Yankees the last 5 years, or the Mets the last 4 years.

Stop beating up on Mo.

— Eric
1:45 pm January 8th, 2009

Wait just one flippin’ minute…..BOTH Penny and Smoltz are health risks and no one has any real idea when they will be available. All of you whiners are telling me THAT is what you want the Cardinals to sigh?

I am 100% sure that every one of you would be whining in June about “Dr. Paletta and the Cardinals medical buffoons” if these guys weren’t healthy.

Hypocrisy at it’s finest.

— dn3524
1:47 pm January 8th, 2009

Nice objectivity, Roger.

John Smoltz is coming off of an injury that will keep him from pitching until well into the season. How does he help the Cardinals? Haven’t we been through this? He is not a guy that is going to help this team right away, nor will he be around in order to shield Perez or Motte from overexposure. He can’t protect the Cards from the potential situation where Carpenter is not ready to go. There is no reason to give him $5M guaranteed. The slant to your article is obvious and ignorant.

— etp_stl
2:24 pm January 8th, 2009

Point taken, etp, but the Red Sox knew that Smoltz is not expected back until May or June, and they obviously think he’s worth it. If you’re a team that thinks it is going to contend for a playoff spot, and have aspirations of actually advancing in the playoffs, 4 or 5 months of an 8-time All-Star and former Cy Young winner at $5 million seems like a bargain. Just one man’s opinion.

— Roger Hensley
2:41 pm January 8th, 2009

The Red Sox have options to wait on injured players, the Cards don’t have. It seems like the Cards are darned if they do & darned it they don’t. Maybe the Cards can sign Roger Clemmons and pay him $8 million to play for 2 months. While John Smoltz is a good player and a good reliever, wouldn’t it be prudent to see, if he can even pitch effectively again first. If everybody thought that way, maybe the Cards gave up too soon on Mark Mulder & Matt Clements.
I say, let’s see how the current Cards play first. If they need help, the owners can always make deals later.

— bustedbtym
4:10 pm January 8th, 2009

All this team needs is a dependable starter and a stop gap closer. Why is this so hard to get? Several teams still need outfielders.

— roger from tahoe
11:08 pm January 8th, 2009

Bustedbtym, I agreee. The cards don’t have the luxury to gamble on players trying to ‘comeback’. Been there and have paid the price. Trust me, the Sox have tried the low haning fruit in the past without much success (Clements, Colon, Shilling, etc). But it doesn’t affect them, at the trade deadline. If we signed 15 million of risk, which doesn’t pan out, we have no wiggle room left.

— bostonbird
1:31 pm January 9th, 2009