Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
04.21.2009 1:51 pm

Blues need more offense from defense

  • Email this
  • Print this

THE WATERCOOLER

QUESTION: Last week at this time hope sprang eternal as the Blues were about to kick off their first postseason series since 2004. One week later the team finds itself in a 3-0 hole facing Vancouver tonight in an elimination game. Has anything that has transpired in the past week changed your thoughts on this team overall? Have the playoffs revealed any major areas of need that the return of injured players next season cannot resolve?

JEREMY RUTHERFORD
Even though I predicted the Blues to win the series, I don’t think any differently about this team than I did a week ago. Vancouver has played great hockey and the Canuck players, with a ton of pressure on them, have silenced their critics. Meanwhile, no one could have predicted the Blues special teams would collapse and that’s what has happened. The one glaring hole on the Blues side has been their ineffectiveness to get the puck out of the zone. You can see by watching Vancouver how important good transition is. Next year, Erik johnson will be a big lift in that area.

JEFF GORDON
The big Blues weakness is the lack of offense on defense. This team lacks scoring threats from the point. The Blue seldom make the home-run outlet pass and rushing the puck out of their zone against good fore-checking is difficult. The return of Erik Johnson will help fix this. If Eric Brewer makes it back from his neck injury, that will help too. So will the development of 2008 top pick Alex Pietrangelo.

TOM TIMMERMANN
Coming in, I saw this series as a bonus, a chance for the Blues kids to get their feet wet in the postseason, but not much else. Vancouver was a hot team and just a bad matchup. This was not a Blues team that had the look of one making a long postseason run. So T.J. Oshie and Patrik Berglund and David Backes and all those guys can get the feel for the postseason and get those jitters out of the way. Next year, if they make the playoffs, it will be familiar for them. Better to have the team do an early playoff exit this year than next year, when the team should be substantially better. The Canucks series hasn’t changed my thoughts on the team, but reinforced them: This is a young inexperienced team that needs to learn some lessons. They are being learned.

KEVIN WHEELER (Host of “Sports Open Line” on KMOX)
After they closed out the regular season on such a strong note I thought for sure the Blues would make a strong showing in this series. The frustrating thing is that this young team hasn’t played nearly as well as it can and yet the club has still been right there in every game. Close but no cigar.

What this series has done is put a spotlight on something most people following the Blues have talked about for a couple of years now — they don’t have enough skilled, puck-moving defensemen. That will eventually change with the return of Erik Johnson and the development of Alex Pietrangelo, but for now it’s just not there.

With a little more maturity and development from the young guys, and clean bills of health for EJ and Paul Kariya, the Blues should be just fine going forward. I don’t see any “major” areas of weakness going forward, just areas that will improve with time and experience.

ANDY STRICKLAND (Hockeybuzz.com, KFNS)
We all know the Blues have been a great story here in 2009. It wasn’t too long ago that nobody, including the media, cared about pucks. So at the very least the Blues have put themselves back on the map in terms of relevance and there’s something to be said for that. The reality is the regular season is done and a new season has begun.

This is not the time to sit around and pat the Blues on the back for taking the city on a joyful 12-week ride. That time will come once the club has cleaned out their stalls. In the meantime the Blues have been disappointing to date in the playoffs. This doesn’t mean we turn our backs on what took place during the regular season. The goal in the playoffs though is to win and the Blues haven’t gotten the job done. The Canucks have more players on their bench who have elevated their game this series compared to St. Louis.

Sure having Erik Johnson and Paul Kariya would help, that’s obvious, but the Blues — in my opinion — don’t have enough natural scoring and that area could use some upgrading. The defense has been exposed for what it is and will be better adding Johnson, Eric Brewer, and potentially Alex Pietrangelo. In reality this is a learning process for the Blues and this playoff experience will only help them moving forward. In the meantime Blues fans deserve better than what they’ve seen this playoff series.

10 comments

Comments are closed.

Yes the Blues have not played as well as we all had hoped but it sounds like all these “Water Cooler” writers have given up on the hometown team!
How about some positive comments (for today’s game), show some support and maybe we get a win tonight? Just ask Bosox in 2004!
Go Blues

— 64cardswin
2:31 pm April 21st, 2009

I know^^^.

The series is not over. The Blues have been clawing back all year. Here is to pulling off the stunner!!

— Nick
2:35 pm April 21st, 2009

Strickland is overstating the point — EVERY team would love to have more natural scoring, at forward and on defense. Sure, EJ, Kariya, and Pietrangelo will help there; but I think there’s a lot of scoring there to be found, it’s just all young. The Kid Line has NOT lived up to their potential in the playoffs, which can be easily explained by the fact that they weren’t even expected to be here. Getting used to the level (or lack) of officiating in the playoffs is another adjustment that experience will help. I think Woywitka and Colaiacovo will be good puck-moving d-men as well, a la Steve Duchesne; but I do agree that what’s missing is a blueliner with a huge shot. Then again, how many Al MacInnises come along? Maybe Al should take the younger d-men up to the Alberta farm for a summer of slapping pucks at the barn door. But the team is ahead in terms of progress, and a slap-down in the news right now is, IMHO, no matter how it’s motivated, inappropriate. And finally: What do we do about Keith Tkachuk?

— pjb_bluesfan
2:53 pm April 21st, 2009

Great season blues but I think my Canucks should take the series. I like what the future holds for your team. Oshie, Backes, Johnson these guy’s are going to be a force. Good luck next year

— mac
3:03 pm April 21st, 2009

64cardswin - it is NOT the writers job to play hometown sucker and paint rosey pictures about a 3-0 playoff defecit… and what do you mean “giving up” on the Blues? Do you really think that none of these guys are going to even watch the game?

And “positive comments” might help them win? What? That is fricking silly… there wasn’t a soul in Boston that gave the Sox any chance when they were down 3-0 to the Yankees. They didn’t come back, b/c the Boston Globe wrote positive hometown comments. And it can work in reverse as well anyways… you ever heard the headline “Lonborg and Champagne” ????????? For a 60s Cardinals fan you should know better.

And if the Blues are that thin-skinned, then they don’t deserve to be in the NHL.

— Chuck Wilson
3:06 pm April 21st, 2009

The forwards are fine, better puck moving d will make them looks loads better. look what campbell has done for chi town…

— sc
3:14 pm April 21st, 2009

The Blues are on a mission, and this year they took the next step. Next year will be an amazing season to watch. The Blues will be in the top five of the conference, and we’ll be blessed to be Blues fans again. I can’t wait for next year. BUT….

They will win tonight, and pull off a victory in Vancouver. You can’t keep this much talent down. The lucky bounces and deflections will finally start going their way, and by Saturday we’ll be talking about their chances to even the series at home on Sunday. Have faith…we are NOT Cub fans. I’m hopeful about next year…but I’m not waiting until next year. GO BLUES!!!!

— IowaBlues
3:43 pm April 21st, 2009

“Maybe Al should take the younger d-men up to the Alberta farm for a summer of slapping pucks at the barn door”

Um, do you mean the Nova Scotia farm? He is not from Alberta and his shot was not developed there. The old barn story revolves around his home in Cape Breton, Nova Scotia…

At any rate, most of these guys have the shots they have now and no amount of work is going to change that significantly. It takes YEARS to develop an Al MacInnis slapshot and the accuracy he had to go with it. I would rather see Woywitka and Colaiacovo (no chance of either being a Steve Duchense btw…neither are that good of a skater…not even close) concentrate on making a good pass or 2 and then when given the chance to shoot, actually hit the freaking net!!! I am not sure I have seen a team whose defenseman are worse at getting the puck through traffic or if they do get it through, as bad at hitting the glass or the boards 5′ from the goal as the Blues are this year. They all need to throw out whatever sticks they are using and find something else, because they just suck at shooting right now.

— ctg44
4:10 pm April 21st, 2009

Sure, the Blues can play better, but so can the Canucks.

— bob
4:16 pm April 21st, 2009

Let’s keep it real, here. The Blues were in the basement in the Western Conference before pulling it together and going on a phenomenal roll and into the playoffs. They got as good as they could with the talent they have and they ran out of gas. The playoffs are all about heart, skill and experience and the Blues are still a work in progress in this regard.

The Blues still depend on a lot of filler/journeyman players (BJ Crombeen, Dan Hinote, Mike Weaver, Jay McClement, Jay McKee, Jeff Woywitka…) and it really shows in this series. There simply is no substitute for skill. Just ask Andy McDonald. He is an artist on the ice with serious talent and incredible on-ice vision.

Great year for the Blues with a ton of upside. Next year should be very exciting…

— Jimmy59
8:42 pm April 21st, 2009