Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
05.04.2009 12:23 pm

What makes Bulger a success in 2009?

  • Email this
  • Print this

THE WATERCOOLER

QUESTION: A rebuilt offensive line and a healthy Steven Jackson should take some pressure off of QB Marc Bulger this season. However, Bulger has been given a very young WR corps to work with. Taking all those factors into account, what would a successful season for Bulger look like this year?

JIM THOMAS
Bulger must work the ball more to his backs and tight ends as the young wide receivers develop. He must cut down on mistakes, and get back in the habit of throwing the ball away when nothing’s there. An incompletion is always better than a sack or an interception. Accuracy remains one of Bulger’s biggest assets, so he needs to make the Rams’ new West Coast scheme — which generally relies on timing and shorter passes — play to that strength.

BERNIE MIKLASZ
More touchdown passes than interceptions, a passer rating that gets him back up to around 80, 85. Those are the tangibles. He can do a lot better job of competing and not letting the adversity sap his spirit. It’s a bad example for young Rams players when Bulger is on the sideline rolling his eyes or smirking or laughing when the team is getting its backside kicked.

BRYAN BURWELL
Statistically, getting that completion percentage back up into the 60s is going to be the first indicator that things are on the right track for Bulger, who when given time is one of the most accurate passers in the NFL. But the ultimate statistical barometer will still come down to number of victories. If he looks strong and comfortable in the pocket and this team wins six or seven games, you’d have to judge that as a successful season.

BILL COATS
Something like the season he put together in 2006, when he threw for more than 4,000 yards and 24 TDs, with just eight interceptions. A healthy Randy McMichael at tight end should help in that regard. And, yes, the wideouts are young and largely inexperienced, but there’s some talent there. It’s not a bare cupboard.

JEFF GORDON
Successful year for Bulger: Take charge of the offense for a change. Recognize pass pressure. Step up into the pocket, step into throws. Make good decisions with the ball, especially in the red zone. Get the ball out quickly. I’m more interested in how he looks in the pocket than what sort of numbers he puts up. If his receivers run around confused and they drop passes, he can’t control that. But there is a lot he CAN control — and there is a lot he did wrong the last two years.

KATHLEEN NELSON
The picture of a successful season would be vertical, rather than horizontal: an upright Bulger, rather than Bulger sprawled on the ground. The TV commentators often use the phrase “managing the offense” with a negative tone in their voices, meaning that the quarterback isn’t responsible for big plays. Effective management is a positive, not a negative. So, for the Rams this season, an efficient performance from Bulger would be an improvement over last year.

KEVIN WHEELER (Host of “Sports Open Line” on KMOX)
Two statistical measures come to mind immediately — completion percentage and touchdown-to-interception ratio.

To have a “successful” season Bulger needs to get back above the 60 percent completion rate and turn the TD/INT ratio upside down from the past two seasons. If he doesn’t have more touchdown passes than picks then he’s not doing his job, great receivers or not.

One of Steve Spagnuolo’s former teams, the Eagles, went on a 46-18 run from 2000-2003 and did so without any impact receivers on the roster. In those four seasons only two wide receivers caught 60 or more passes (James Thrash had 63 in 2000; Todd Pinkston had 60 in ’02) yet they got it done because they ran the ball, they threw it to the running backs a ton and because Donovan McNabb threw twice as many touchdowns as interceptions during those years.

Bulger doesn’t need to win a lot of games or put up Pro Bowl numbers to have a “successful” season in ’09, in part because the team is in a rebuilding season. He just needs to look like he’s not overmatched. Minimizing turnovers and completing a high percentage would do a lot for him in that regard.

32 comments

Comments are closed.

Have more #10 Jersey’s in the stands than any other. Rather than Wins, stats, etc., that would be the true measure of a successful Bulger season.

— salukistan
1:30 pm May 4th, 2009

I hope Bulger can get his mojo back. If he can’t, anyone wanna speculate on how much gas kyle boller has in his tank?

— cantwaittil2012
1:36 pm May 4th, 2009

You say he needs time in the pocket - he needs to carry a fence down the field with him. I don’t believe if he was given 5 minutes he would be any better. Hope his face changes - he is the same off/on/throwing/whatever. Never does he look happy with his or anyone else’s accomplishment. Why in the world would you want to waste your money on a shirt with the #10. Hopefully, he will be short lived.

— Cricket
1:52 pm May 4th, 2009

Obviously Bulger is not a succesful QB in Cricket’s eyes.

— salukistan
2:00 pm May 4th, 2009

I think that Bernie hit the nail on the head. There is nothing more demoralizing to a young team and the fans than seeing Bulgers sideline tantrums. Hopefully he can try having a positive attitude. And quit the eye rolling…reminds me of a school girl!

— JaZzIsM50
2:54 pm May 4th, 2009

Only a couple of these writers got it right

YOU CAN’T HOLD BULGER TO LOWER STANDARDS BECAUSE HE HAS BEEN TERRIBLE THE LAST FEW YEARS.

Bulger success should be gauged the same as every other QB in the league.

— Justin
3:29 pm May 4th, 2009

What makes Bulger a success in 2009? A lobotomy. The guy is no leader.

— jacob
3:32 pm May 4th, 2009

I agree with most of the comments, but, with such a young group of receivers, how will we know whether an error from Bulger is his fault or the receiver’s.

Sometimes an interception is due to the receiver running the wrong route rather than the QB’s errant throw. Unfortunately, the QB gets the blame for the pick almost all the time.

I just think people need to realize that all those int’s, sacks and incompletions aren’t necessarily Bulger’s fault. It takes time for receivers to acclimate to the NFL. I can only hope that Avery, Burton and Robinson have made the transition and will help Bulger improve his performance.

— Glimmer Twin
5:23 pm May 4th, 2009

a Trade to cleveland!!!!

— bustedbtym
5:24 pm May 4th, 2009

Oh come on Glimmer Twin!!!! Bulger has never been a warrior. He has to command the players to play better. If the QB is a general, then Bulger is a private. The whole team was horrible, with exception of a select few. The Rams & the fans need to grow up. As long as Bulger, has no competition for the QB position, he will be terrible. Besides 2003, he has not had a winning season. I do not consider 8-8 to be a winning record. These Rams fans are delusional about Bulger accomplishments. 5-27 makes Bulger a candidate for the Tidy Bowl “man of the year” Award. Even Boller will be better than Bulgerbum.

— bustedbtym
5:38 pm May 4th, 2009

If the Rams move the ball steadily on O and put up more points, the D is automatically better. More leads to protect and time off the clock. I believe Bulger and the Rams can/will/should be dramatically better. How hard is that though after a 3-13 season?

— lafanfromstl
5:47 pm May 4th, 2009

A successful year for Marc, 15 TD and 10 or fewer int. SJ running for 1800 and catching passes for another 1000. A defense that can stop the opposition. And special teams that can tackle a returner before he gets 30 yards down field. Bulger is NOT the biggest problem this team had/has.

— blackbart
6:22 pm May 4th, 2009

No QB would have been productive for the Rams during the past 2+ seasons….Maybe a mad scrambler. Go look how many times Bulger was sacked or hit..gobs!!! Most of that was on his ineffective O-line. QBs that take that kind of beating often lose confidence. I think Wheeler hit it on the head. If Bulger is protected and adapts to the new system, he’ll be fine. By the way, the guy was caught on camera 1 TIME rolling his eyes after conversing with Linehan….Now, he’s accused of throwing tantrums? And as far as, Glimmer Twin’s comment re Bulger’s leadership that “He has to command the players to play better”….trust me, one of the quietest, calm and demure guys in history was Joe Montana. He didn’t bark at anybody. To be sure, Bulger hasn’t shown the clutch ability that Montana possessed. But, if Bulger wasn’t a respected leader on the field, other offensive players would have voiced their displeasure by now. Does he need to play better? Absolutely! But, he needs 10 other positions to seriously elevate their play so that the team improves.

— knuckles
6:25 pm May 4th, 2009

A trade to Cleveland, a lobotomy….these are good options for a successful Bulger. Retirement would be another. But I think one more season where he gets pounded while the organization rebuilds the rest of team is fine with me. He’ll be well compensated for it. By 2010 we should have a new QB ready to work with the new team.

— thamnosma
7:22 pm May 4th, 2009

Does anyone seriously see this guy ever holding the superbowl trohy? I dont think so - he is soft and far from a leader and you can’t fix that. The fact that they are building a team around his shortcomings should be proof enough…or the fact that he likes to roll his eyes like a 13 year old girl..

Its time to man-up, admit the mistake and find a new leader becasue i am tired of hearing Marc whisper during press conferences.

— Jim_Hanifan
8:12 pm May 4th, 2009

How about winning? Stats don’t matter if you are getting beaten badly and you rack up mop-up stats in the final quarter….like I believe he has done in his career. Even when his numbers were OK, I always felt he racked up stats in games which were not close. Bernie…you can find any stat. What are Bulger’s stats in close games versus when his team is down by more than 10 points. Maybe I am wrong.

Finally, his win/loss record is horrible and he needs to be held accountable for that like everyone else. Look at his record since 2004….yikes! I hate to say it as a Rams fan, but I can’t see us competing until we have a new QB.

— DerekM
8:23 pm May 4th, 2009

The miraculous development of peripheral vision? I don’t know…but the headline is apparently a question?

— Mr. Burwell's favorite nephew
8:34 pm May 4th, 2009

Bulger is the best the Rams have at the moment. The “O” line was part of Bulger’s decline BUT not all of it. Bulger made poor throws and took sacks he could have avoided by just throwing the ball away. Believe me, Marc knows he has to perform or he is out. I am still not too optimistic for Bulger’s turn around, his poor mechanics will be hard to lick. Jim Everett suffered from what Marc is going through now and he left the then LA Rams a battered QB.

— Rams5010
11:33 pm May 4th, 2009

We could have had Cutler or Sanchez, but noooo. When Bulger was the backup he seemed to have some intensity.

Does Bulger live in St. Louis? Does he ever hang out with the other players? He doesnt seem to be a part of the community or the team.

Steven Jackson seems to care and was called a professional by the coach. The quiet quarterback needs to get loud and take charge of his team. Hang out with the other players and show that you are the leader.

Maybe he does hang out with players and maybe he is their leader, but its hard to tell if he does.

Bulger has the talent and I think if he had to fight for first string that he would show more intensity and that would bring on better results.

— Ramsfan
2:37 am May 5th, 2009

I truly hope I’m wrong, because I want this team to win as much as the other guy, but I’m afraid at the end of season the coaching staff and front office will believe they made a mistake by passing up Sanchez, this guy is the real deal and is going to be a true NFL Quarterback for years to come, plus they will end up trying to trad Mark, or just flat out release him……sorry
just MHO.

RamblingRam

— RamblingRam
3:46 am May 5th, 2009

A new team?

— Scrum
8:07 am May 5th, 2009

What makes Bulger a success in 2009?
Buy into the new coaching staffs schemes and never look back.

— old larry
9:01 am May 5th, 2009

marc is our quarterback for another 2 or 3 seasons….keith null is the future to the rams making it to the playoffs…and maybe a super bowl!!!!

— RamsFan#39
9:08 am May 5th, 2009

I like Jeff Gordons and Bernie’s answers the best. It’s not what kind of numbers he puts up, it’s how he looks and reacts in the pocket, make better decisions, take charge of the offense for a change……….do a better job of competing. Be a better leader, stop smirking and smiling during and after games…………it blows my mind when he gets interviewed after a game in which the Rams just got pummeled and he just smiles or smirks about it as he explains what went wrong. He says if you want to blame someone, just blame me, but we’ve heard it so many times that you wonder if he really means it or if it’s just a rehearsed line for him to say. The guy just isn’t a ball of fire, what can you say? I mean in one interview last year, he said “Maybe we should let Trent start to see if we can get something going. Anything to get us going” I mean here’s your starter offering to bench himself? Unreal……….I do expect him to put up better numbers this year, I think the west coast offense will serve him well, but team management has got to realize that unless we see a Fighting Competetive Bulger this year, one that we’ve never seen before, that they need to part with him and look for another QB…………I’m still excited about Boller, I’d love to see this guy start a few games and see what he’s got. If the Rams offense suffers in September, then they’d be fools not to let Boller get a shot to run the team. I still have hope for that guy. Thanks for the article!

— BillP
12:19 pm May 5th, 2009

A successful season to me would be showing one tenth the emotion of his new coach. Bulgers lack of emotion drains the fans,I can only imagine what it does to his teammates. Well the teammates that want to win and get fired up!

— ron
1:48 pm May 5th, 2009

It’s amazing that mild mannered Tom Landry ever won a game.

— salukistan
2:08 pm May 5th, 2009

Bulger’s success must be measured by making the playoffs and playing well. He has won 5 games he past two years—that speaks for itself. I predict, given the west coast offense (short dump off system)the Rams will employ,that he will have respectable completion stats next year as he continues to dump off short passes. He does not possess the skill or leadership ability to read defenses,lead late drives to win games or consistantly throw long. The opposition will give him the short stuff that will not hurt them and his stats will be favorable but misleading. The Rams will double their wins to six and some will say he had a great year because of that. If you are satisfied with mediocrity then he will survive another year. He is not going to lead the team to the Super Bowl. The Rams put themselves in a box by having too much money invested in him to get rid of him. The only way the Rams will drop him is if he is too hurt play.

— Fred Walton
2:14 pm May 5th, 2009

I think that Marc Bulger needs to stand next to the watercooler and hold a clipboard and that will make him successfull in 2009. Im not goin to be a homer just because i live in st louis and say that i quaterback is good because he is horrible, widely overrated and doesnt deserve to be the starting quarterback. The Rams have had a chance to draft or trade for a quarterback in the last 4 drafts and have passed and then decide to give this quarterback some 4or5 year deal for like 60 million dollars!!! outrageous!!!!!

— Chris Bunce
2:17 pm May 5th, 2009

Bulger is too scared, every game is like a bad Halloween for him, and he probably has to clean the crap out of his slacks after every game. Even with protection, although I still don’t expect him to get any, he will still take 15 yard sacks and throw lollipops to the other team. And they will thank him for the Halloween candy. However, I’m still hoping for a successful season…..3-13. I’m ready to be a LA Rams fan….

— Robert_Rozier
3:49 pm May 5th, 2009

Uh, how about not leading the league in sacks. That is Bulger’s only problem. If the Oline fixes that, then all you analysts will be jumping all over the offensive line going “We knew he still had it all along, his offensive line just wasnt giving him time!”

— Jason
6:43 pm May 6th, 2009

I think Burwell has the right idea in what determines success in this league and that’s winning. Winning the Super Bowl has too many intangibles and just one man cannot do it alone. People get the idea that all they had to get was a great player and they’ve won the Super Bowl IMHO. Michael Jordan didn’t win a championship until they got Scotty Pippin and others stepped up. Even then they didn’t win it all until they upped their defense. Then they won 6 titles. Most people are not Patton which I think most stereotypify as a leader. Most leaders led by example and Patton was no different. He seemed to be always at the front. Mahatma Ghandi was no Patton neither was John Wooden. Quiet but led by example! The fact is they led! lafanfromstl..defense doesn’t get better by the offense scoring pts. That’s idiotic and irrational. Defense gets better by keeping the other offense from scoring!

— akramsfn60
10:04 pm May 6th, 2009

If you read the history of Patton, you would know that he was not George C. Scott. He commanded yes but that’s what generals do and when he got excited his voice was high and squeaky. He had guts and that’s why they called him “Old Blood and Guts”. One thing that he demanded was excellence from his men and he trained them but once he trained them he gave them a command and let them carry out the order. He left the option of doing it any way they can but left them alone after commanding them. He believed in his men. Same way with John Wooden. The only difference was their demeanor.

— akramsfn60
2:00 pm May 7th, 2009