Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
06.24.2009 12:40 pm

What should the Blues do in first round?

  • Email this
  • Print this

THE WATERCOOLER

QUESTION: Is there a specific area of need you think the Blues should address in the weekend’s draft, or do they just take the best available player at No. 17 overall?

JEREMY RUTHERFORD
The Blues have the No. 17 pick, but they believe they’ll get a player on their Top 10 list. That’s not an uncommon feeling heading into a draft. When the Blues drafted Patrik Berglund No. 25 overall in 2006, they felt they could get a player who was in their Top 15. They had to move up from No. 30 to do so, but they did it. Every team has a different list, so players you don’t expect to be available sometimes are.

The Blues don’t have a No. 1 (Erik Johnson) or a No. 4 (Alex Pietrangelo) draft selection like they’ve had in recent years, but they’ll get a good player at No. 17 . . . assuming they stand pat. Remember, T.J. Oshie went No. 24, Berglund went No. 25, David Perron went No. 26 in their respective drafts. Those three make up the youthful core of the team.

As far as this year’s draft, I believe the Blues will take the best player available, but they’re probably hoping its a forward. At some point, the Blues are going to trade one of their young forwards (not saying Perron, Berglund or Oshie, but somebody), and they’re going to have to keep the cupboard filled. So listen for names like RW Jordan Schroeder, C Scott Glennie or C Louis Leblanc at No. 17.

JEFF GORDON
They need to draft a forward. Which one . . . well, that is a toss-up, since nobody can predict how the draft will unfold after the first three picks. I’ve seen at least a half-dozen forward prospects linked to the Blues. Scorers, power forwards, skilled two-way centers — every description has been mentioned as possibilities for this team. Adding talent in any of these categories would be nice.

TOM TIMMERMANN
It’s unlikely they’ll get anyone who can make an immediate impact that far down, so I think it’s wrong to draft for immediate need. That being said, if there’s someone out there who has any kind of potential as a goalscorer, I say grab him. While Larry Pleau has told me one million times you can never have too many defensemen, if you can develop your own goalscorers, you save a bunch of cash and a lot of headaches on the free agency market. I say: Go for the offense.

DAN O’NEILL
Drafting at 17th, the Blues can’t approach things committed to filling a specific need. They have young forwards, they have young defensemen and they have young goaltenders. At the same time, they are a team that was eliminated in four games in the playoffs, so they can use help everywhere. I would be thinking forward, but I would be looking for the best player available.

8 comments

Comments are closed.

Wow, almost all of you just echoed what the great Jarmo Kekalainen has preached for decades, “draft the best player available.”

Nothing new in what I just read above.

— Derrick
1:45 pm June 24th, 2009

Take Louis LeBlanc…he’s got the best “hockey name” of them all.

— BoredBirdFanInBabylon
2:50 pm June 24th, 2009

Wow Derrick, why read at all when you have read it all?

— ForEverRed
2:56 pm June 24th, 2009

So Timmermann, you say it is “unlikely” that the Blues will be able to pick anyone that would have an immediate impact due to the fact they are picking at number 17. You may want to check with Mr. Rutherford, because as I recall and he posted above, Perron was pick at number 26 and as I further recall, he made the opening day roster. Anything is possible especially with Mr. Kekalainen at the helm.

— BleedBlue
3:27 pm June 24th, 2009

Kekalainen is worth his weight in reindeer racks…

— BoredBirdFanInBabylon
3:59 pm June 24th, 2009

Draft the best player available and that might be Ellison who scored a ton points this season on the blue line. As we’ve seen over the years it doesn’t hurt to have talent on the back end. Prospects on the back end command more value even when they’re potential is discussed(see Eric brewer and the scores of like defensemen who never reach what they were forecasted to).

On top of that no one knows what injuries may come about or how exactly the pay roll will end up a fe years down the line.

But if there’s a player out there that could help today that I’d particularly like and think has the extras that create a winning atmosephere I’d go with trading up to get Jordan Schroeder.

— Chris
8:09 pm June 24th, 2009

Plain and simple the Blues have to find a way to draft two guys named Zack!
beyond that nothing else matters!

— Wild Bill
9:18 pm June 24th, 2009

The Blues just need to take the best player available on their draft board. I think in the NHL and MLB drafts you need to do that at every pick. In the NFL and NBA, you can draft for needs.

If the Blues actually get enough depth at defense or even offense at some point because of taken the same position each year early, eventually the Blues will be able to trade from that depth and then get a player that fits a specific need.

— Brian W
9:48 pm June 24th, 2009