Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
09.15.2009 1:18 pm

Man in the middle: Is Laurinaitis a keeper?

  • Email this
  • Print this

THE WATERCOOLER

QUESTION: There wasn’t a whole lot to like about Sunday’s game in Seattle. One bright spot, however, was the play of rookie linebacker James Laurinaitis, who was credited with 14 tackles. What’s your long- term prognosis on Laurinaitis? Have the Rams found the player to man the middle of the defense for years to come?

JIM THOMAS
Laurinaitis certainly looks like a keeper, but one game doesn’t make a career. And for all the good things he did in run defense against Seattle, he made a couple of costly mistakes in pass coverage. If he wants to be an effective every down player in the NFL, Laurinaitis must learn to play the pass as well as the run.

BERNIE MIKLASZ
There’s been a tendency among some STL media members to all but nominate Laurinaitis for enshrinement to the Pro Football Hall of Fame, but obviously he has the potential to be a very good MLB in the NFL. He has the athleticism. He’s instinctive. He’s tough. He works hard to be a student of the game. That said, he doesn’t have top-end speed, and his methodical change-of-direction will get him left behind on some plays. Obviously, his pass coverage skills need work; that’s a rookie thing. He will come along. He’s a nice fit for what Steve Spagnuolo is trying to do with his defense. He should be a fixture. In a few years we’ll know whether the Rams made the right call in taking Laurinaitis over USC’s Rey Maualuga.

JEFF GORDON
At the least, he will be a very solid middle linebacker for years to come. He just has a knack for being around the ball in run support.
His days in the Big Ten didn’t prepare him for pass coverage, but that should come. But . . . will he ever but a real game changer, ala Aaron Curry? That remains to be seen.

BILL COATS
Laurinaitis certainly looks like the real deal. He’s a true middle linebacker, something the Rams have lacked for quite a while. He has a nose for the ball, and perhaps just as important, he’s a smart, confident guy who’s not at all intimidated by the responsibility of making the defensive calls.

KATHLEEN NELSON
He’s off to a good start statistically, with 14 tackles and a fumble recovery. But, really, will anyone care if the unit continues to get steamrolled? Even on a 20-yard run, someone eventually makes the tackle, unless the play ends up in the endzone. So, the stats are moot if the defense as a whole doesn’t play better.

26 comments

Comments are closed.

james laurinaitis is a stud..he was basically a 2nd first round pick hes got a swagger about him that isnt cocky are arrogant, but it more of humbly confident. i hope he has an amazing career

— b
1:51 pm September 15th, 2009

Laurinaitis has proven to be an excellent choice, especially for Spagnuolo’s team, who will only improve and will be a better fit here than Maualuga. Will he be better than Curry? Maybe not, but I’ll bet that Laurinaitis and Smith will prove to be better duo as first two picks than Curry and any OT remaining when Laurinaitis was chosen.

— Prof
2:23 pm September 15th, 2009

Why does Jeff Gordon consider Aaron Curry to be a real game changer at this point? What has he done so far? He certainly wasn’t the reason that the Rams were so inept on offense this past Sunday.

— thirteen28
2:32 pm September 15th, 2009

Gotta love you guys…first you say that one game does not a career make down playing what JL is capable of doing, (and by the way DID ACTUALLY DO did do in the Seattle game), then Gordo annoints Curry a “game changer” based on one game??? It certainly wasn’t Curry who “changed” the Seattle game….we needed a middle linebacker after not having one for YEARS and in my opinion got the best one in the draft; and 14 tackles, with 10 unassisited AND a fumble recovery in his first ever NFL game certainly suggests that we did exactly that. I am with b and hope JL has a great career….

— marc
2:52 pm September 15th, 2009

we all hope jl does good not since fletcher have we had anything for some reason i can handle a pass rather than getting ripped for 20yd dashes at a time remember al those years of people running all over us i think that they are coming to an end

— denny
3:05 pm September 15th, 2009

this is hilarious….one game…what should we think of him? really??? he made a ton of tackles, picked up a fumble, and has some growth to do on pass coverage. is he a keeper? let’s wait awhile to decide.

really??? how about jackson, or bulger, or the young wr’s? anything different about them?

— truefan
3:08 pm September 15th, 2009

Laurinaitis is a great addition and did wonders in OH but the Rams are ranked 32 in the NFL after that sory game in Seattle. The team as a whole better do something different or nobody will look good.

— first
4:04 pm September 15th, 2009

Prof - I think that Eben Britton AND Phil Loadholt, both taken after Laurinaitis, will be better than Jason Smith will be. Granted, Loadholt has the advantage on being with a better offensive team with a much better running back, so it may not be a talent issue for Jason Smith. I just have a strange feeling that in 3 to 5 years the Rams will be drafting another OT in the first round to replace Smith at RT (I think Barron will still be the Rams starting LT in 3 to 5 years). Jason Smith may still be a Ram though at this time and be Jacob Bell’s replacement at LG.

— Wally
4:44 pm September 15th, 2009

Marc - I completely agree. I laughed out loud at Curry being annointed a game-changer already. Let’s give both guys a little time. JL is off to a great start at what we all hope is a long productive stay in the middle of the Rams defense.

— Jeff in Iowa
4:52 pm September 15th, 2009

Oh, and Aaron Curry had only 4 solo tackles, no passes defensed, no sacks, and no tackles for loss…not really “game-changing” numbers…

— Wally
4:57 pm September 15th, 2009

Well said Ms. Nelson. I care more about the performance of the defensive unit as a whole than giving accolades to any one player. I don’t care if any of them make the Pro Bowl. I just want to be competitive and win some games.

— GoRams2001
5:09 pm September 15th, 2009

Rey Maualuga Did not play for the Bengals Why would Bernie even bring that up. USC is soooo over rated by the press. How many starting MLBs di they have in the league? 0

— wilsondc
5:31 pm September 15th, 2009

RAMS IT IS SIMPLE “WIN” !!!!!!!

— John
6:43 pm September 15th, 2009

Just think, he could be learning behind London Fletcher….oh wait, we gave up on him about 8 years ago…yeah, he sucked that’s right. I remember now.

— BG
6:49 pm September 15th, 2009

I have to think that Laurinitis was the pick, This kid is the real deal. I wouldn’t get all hyped up over Curry. He didn’t look as good as Laurinitis and cost a whole lot more too. The Rams were terrible sunday up in Seattle and that helped the Seahawks defense look like Pittsburgh. Laurinitis will be a rock for many moons. He was a really good choice.

— fredbird
8:52 pm September 15th, 2009

the only reason he got so many tackles is because he plays ILB, its like his job to do that.

— andrew Klein
9:28 pm September 15th, 2009

Rey Maualuga had 4 solo and 4 assisted tackles, zero sacks, zero passes defensed, and zero tackles for loss and no QB hits

— Wally
9:46 pm September 15th, 2009

What’s this talk about a keeper after one game? That’s idiocy! If I remember right there are 16 games in a season! Also he’s a rookie and the Rams have him for what, 4 seasons? This team will never go to the Super Bowl this year or win the division at this rate with a team full of inexperienced players and all the mismatched losers of the past 4 years. What do you expect? A miracle? In my mind, only God can do that and only if you do believe in him! One man has never made a team,..ie Michael Jordan! He did pretty good for a rookie but who knows after the season whether or not he will be great if that’s what you expect. One game does not make a season either in my book and I don’t expect it! The other parts of the line need to step up and I for one would give Spags time!

— akramsfn60
1:28 am September 16th, 2009

He was a sure tackler at OSU as well. He can only help the defense in this respect.

— Missouri Insurance Guy
8:00 am September 16th, 2009

Is there a more ridiculous question to ask after ONE game? What’s wrong with you morons, slow news day???

— M. Pratt
8:37 am September 16th, 2009

Yes,Laurinaitis is the real deal.He is a impact player,but we need more of them.Our pass rush scares no one.Look at the teams that are successful,they have impact linemen that put heat on a QB which helps the DB`S and the LB.I like what I see with this defense but they need time together some success which gives confidence and the offense to put some points on the board.This team will get better with the changes that have been made.Having said that,I don`t know how many more years I can afford to pay for NFL Sunday ticket,so please hurry!

— waybackram
9:06 am September 16th, 2009

Wow, what a bunch of negative nellies…I’m not saying we need to put the guy in the Hall of Fame immediately, but this bunch of snobs sure have their noses turned up!

— Joel
9:52 am September 16th, 2009

Laurinaitis is a product of the “LEGION OF DOOM” mentality, OF COURSE HE”S A KEEPER!!!!!!!! Get two more to match him in ability and we’ll have our own legion of doom. But…..Bulger and Jackson are the things holding this team back. Trade those two or cut them and look at the money freed up to get players who can actually produce posative yardage! I wish some one would look up to see how much yardage jackson has piled up for a loss or just RUNNING SIDE TO SIDE trying to outrun those he CAN’T. I’ll bet he has a record in that spot, most yardage behind the line of scrimage for no gain or a loss!
But the d showed great strides over the past, This bunch CAN ACTUALLY TACKLE SOMEONE!

— larry wilson
10:30 am September 16th, 2009

I wonder if these opinions would change if Laurinaitis were a Steeler, Titan, or Viking… He reminds me of the situation Issac Bruce was in early in his career. The Rams were terrible, and he was a stud. We’ll just have to wait and see if the he can spearhead our defense into delivering the Greatest Blow on Turf much like Ike brought on the Greatest Show on Turf. I am one who hopes so!!

— Jason
10:55 am September 16th, 2009

Only time will tell…..He was credited with 14 tackles which I believe we probably haven’t had ANY linebacker with that many tackles in a game since London Fletcher, by the way, is the most underated linebacker ever. This guy is good and can get better, he’s going to take his lumps, as with any rookie, but time will tell. I hope he works out. I’m just glad that our leading tacklers for the game were LB’s and not all secondary…. Vobora had 8 tackles for the game and Will 6… Your LB’s are supposed to be your top tacklers, not your secondary… to me thats a small sign of improvement…

— 27midwest1
10:59 am September 16th, 2009

Oh, but I thought the Rams had no talent? The only place this team is lacking talent is IN THE FRONT OFFICE. Devaney was clearly not ready for this job. Passed up on Mark Sanchez…could have still snagged Laurenitis. Besides, how do any of the the players even get motivated to play for this team when they could be gone next week. Even if you are one of the guys that actually perform. I do not buy this NO TALENT montra that the front office and the St. Louis media are talking about. If the Rams have no talent, then release Avery, Jackson, Little, Otogwe…yes exactly…those guys would flurish elsewhere. Devaney is an amatuer. The laughter around the league is at an all time high.

— Jesse R
12:40 pm September 16th, 2009