Who goes further, Mizzou or Illinois?
THE WATERCOOLER
QUESTION: Do you think Missouri or Illinois has the better chance of winning its conference tournament this weekend?
VAHE GREGORIAN
I think Illinois has a better chance of getting to championship game, and if so anything can happen there. Still, can’t quite see the Illini getting by Michigan State if that’s their opponent. Meanwhile, just hard to believe MU can beat Oklahoma for a second time — in Oklahoma City — and then beat Kansas again.
BRYAN BURWELL
Both Missouri and Illinois will face a tough challenge winning their respective conference tournaments, but I give the edge to Illinois for one reason: In order for the Tigers to win the Big 12, they will likely face Oklahoma in the semifinals and that will essentially be a home game for the Sooners in Oklahoma City.
STU DURANDO
Missouri already has beaten the two biggest threats in Kansas and Oklahoma and that could give the Tigers a mental edge. But the possibility of having to beat those teams on consecutive days might be too much to ask. Illinois has proven capable of beating most anyone in the Big Ten but was not up to the task against Michigan State, either at home or on the road. So, I don’t see either team winning their tournament.
TOM TIMMERMANN
I think Missouri has a better shot. They have shown they can beat the top teams in the Big 12 and I think it’s more likely to see top teams cleared out of the way in the Big 12. Mizzou might only have to play one of the league’s heavyweights. (Of course, they could also lose their first game, but we’re dealing with percentages here.) Meanwhile, Illinois fails my 35-point test: No team can win its conference tournament if it scores less than 35 points in a game.
JEFF GORDON
Neither is a great candidate to win their conference tournament. But Illinois has to have a better chance because Missouri can REALLY struggle away from home. The Tigers are totally different outside of Mizzou Arena. At home, the Tigers feed off their crowd and exploit that advantage. On the road, their opponents do a much better job keeping their composure in the face of pressure. At a neutral site, I don’t see the Tigers beating Oklahoma or Kansas.
****
MIDDAY NEWS AND THOUGHTS
GIVE ME THE FRENCH-CANADIAN: It’s definitely true that sometimes the best trades are the ones you don’t make. And I think the Blues made the right decision not packaging David Perron in any trade deadline deals. And this is not a knee-jerk reaction to the kid’s two goals last night. It’s based on what I see his long-term potential being for this club.
Let’s face it, the Blues currently are not ready for an open-ice style of play, which is a style that will work to Perron’s benefit someday. There’s just too much inexperience (youth) among the forwards and the club does not currently have its full arsenal of puck-moving defensemen to consistently start clean breaks out of their zone.
But it’s coming. Carlo Colaiacovo has shown he’s got very good offensive skills for a defenseman (a trade well made), and Roman Polak has surprised most of us with what he’s brought to the parent club this year. And next year, of course, the Blues will welcome back “The Franchise,” defenseman Erik Johnson, who may develop into one of the top puck-moving defensemen in the league.
Furthermore, next season David Backes becomes a de facto veteran and one that has shown a very good all-around game this year. Jay McClement has the speed to move and offers just enough of a threat to keep team’s honest. Alex Steen is showing promise. And, T.J. Oshie and Patrik Berglund will be a year older and a year better. That’s a pretty good corps to build a team that offers more speed, without giving up any real grit.
Which brings me back to David Perron. This kid may be the best stick handler on the team. He’s got mad moves and a nose for the net. With so many other weapons more seasoned and gelling next season, I would expect Perron to lift his game to another level. (Not that his 11 goals and 29 assists are anything to scoff at.)
Keep in mind Perron is just 20 years old. There is a lot of room for growth remaining for this guy. I would expect a closer correlation of goals-to-assists in the near future. Is he a bit cocky? Sure. But I like it. He knows he can play. As long as Perron doesn’t become a divisive presence on the team (which there’s been no indication of), he can be as cock-sure as his stick will allow him, in my opinion.
Last night’s first goal by Perron showed a kid who is growing up. The play not only had sizzle, but the 5-foot-11, 190-pound Perron also showed his heart, outmuscling (yeah, I said it, Perron outmuscled) 6-3, 214-pound Nicklas Grossman around the corner before moving the puck to his forehand and banging home a top-shelfer.
The St. Louis Blues have asked fans this year to “Come Grow With Us.” The fans have complied and bought in. Dealing away a young asset like Perron would have sent the wrong message. Sit back and enjoy watching him grow up … along with a host of other young talents on this team. When Perron hits 22, 23, 24 years old, if he’s playing in any sweater not displaying the Blue Note, fans here will be sorry.
****
SOMETHING TO PONDER
THIS BILLS FAN HAS HAD ENOUGH: Everyone has got their own opinion about Terrell Owens joining the Buffalo Bills, but this video someone sent me from the Dallas Morning News website takes the cake. Be forewarned, it’s a little off-color, but as long as you’re not too easily offended, it’s hilarious. Check it out.
****
DID YOU KNOW?
HOCKEY WITHOUT ICE: Octopush is an underwater hockey game that was introduced in South Africa in the 1960. The players wear skin-diving equipment, use mini-hockey sticks and a regular puck. Other than that, they follow all the rules of hockey … on the floor of a pool.

