Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
07.02.2009 6:29 am

Jacko unwelcome presence at job interview

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

By now, I think all of us can point to the moment when our tolerance for insipid observations on the passing of Michael Jackson hit the breaking point. Mine came early, within a couple of hours of his death actually, when a talking cable news head offered up the pop star as the “greatest musician in history.”

My response was to apologize aloud to Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart and shut off the television.

As I understand it, my “no Michael none of the time” position spared me from hearing Celine Dion who proved her sense of history and proportionality is akin to her talent by comparing the shock of Jackson’s untimely demise to the assassination of John F. Kennedy.

Since we’re on the subject of tacky, let’s talk about the situation described to business and employment consultant Claudia Faust on Recruiting101.com:

“Last week I went on an interview at a Fortune 500 company which really needs to remain nameless. I met with some young bimbo recruiter who was all broken up about the death of Michael Jackson, and spent our entire interview talking about it! Can you fathom this??? The company and the economy are being smacked around and all this person wanted to discuss were my thoughts on this person’s death? Not even a question about the economy or something job related. When did it become fashionable in recruiting to discuss people whose character is questionable? Is this the new what-shape-should-a-manhole-cover-be or if-you-were-a-dog-what-kind-would-you-be question for candidates?”

Faust’s measured response:

“It’s possible that this recruiter is a whack-job whose employment may cause you to think twice about wanting to work for this company. But it’s also possible that you stepped into her life during a moment of intense personal reaction to the death of someone she admired, and if she’d had some time to process her feelings offline she might have behaved more professionally in the interview. Who knows? In retrospect she may be really embarrassed, but think of it this way too: just as you got a front row seat to her reaction, she also got a front row seat to yours - and your obvious contempt for her emotional distress probably didn’t help your cause for employment. She may be wondering if you’ll treat everyone with a different perspective as if they are morons too.” (Read the whole exchange, along with reader comments to Recruting101.com, here.)

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
21 comments

Comments are closed.

If you’re unable to comprehend why Michael Jackson’s death is so important in this era, it’s your loss.

— Sophie
6:54 am July 2nd, 2009

Sophie, you’re an idiot. He was a singer, not a musician. Yeah, he set some awesome stats years ago. But you certainly typify today’s moronic culture. We’re in a serious recession with a ton of world unrest and you defend Michael Jackson’s importance in this era? Yep, maybe you ought to get a life and see what exactly is happening in “this era.” Of course, it’s your loss, because you are definitely lost.

— FrankSinatraisGod
7:51 am July 2nd, 2009

A person who writes, arranges, and performs music is not a musician?? hmmmmm…..

— sbwheel
8:19 am July 2nd, 2009

“Last week I went on an interview at a Fortune 500 company which really needs to remain nameless. I met with some young bimbo recruiter who was all broken up about the death of Michael Jackson, and spent our entire interview talking about it!”

–If this is the case then they’re not serious about hiring, and stay far away. I don’t care if it was the recruiters’ mother or pet cat who died, if she (or he) is spending all that time talking about their personal life, and no time about the position then they don’t take it seriously. And if it was a close family member then they should be at the funeral anyway.

— realitycheck
8:37 am July 2nd, 2009

Bimbo? Whack-job? Very professional and articulate. Sounds like a straw-man story to me anyway.

— phooey
9:04 am July 2nd, 2009

Thank You Steve,

…..for pointing out once again that our media hoices on what “we” want to hear is false and our media is nothing but misperception and misdirection. YOu also reinforced the public cry that our corporations don’t employ based on professionalism…. just nepotism, patronism and politics. You don’t need to wonder why America is in the shape it’s in. Between your article and the ridiculous comments, America speaks for itself.

— Maserati
9:23 am July 2nd, 2009

You’re right, it’s not fair to compare the death of MJ to JFK…Michael Jackson was much more popular and important. This scenario works both ways. I wouldn’t want to work for someone who is so flagrantly pompous and dismissive of someone who meant so much to so many people worldwide. Makes you wonder how he treats his employees.

— supersleuth
9:40 am July 2nd, 2009

MJ was a molester. It is unfathomable that people look past that. And quite honestly, how is his contribution to the music industry any more important than the next guy…because he made the Thriller mini-movie? Puhleese.

— Blue
10:26 am July 2nd, 2009

and JFK was a womanizer who repeatedly lied about it, and almost got us into WWIII with the Bay of Pigs fiasco, not to mention starting the US involvement in Vietnam. What’s your point? Everyone has a good and a bad side, and painting people in broad strokes is not something I look for in a friend or boss.

FYI, he was never convicted of child molestation.

— supersleuth
10:36 am July 2nd, 2009

Lack of sensitivity for a recruiter’s personal feelings that might indicate one’s attitude toward others’ feelings? That is pure baloney. I would be more suspicious of that recruiter’s company, wondering how someone like that managed to get into her position. A company’s recruiter is often the potential candidate’s first direct impression of the company and it’s culture. At the same time, the savvy candidate who really wanted the job would have been able to transition the conversation toward the actual reason for showing up: the job.

— Fred the Great
10:48 am July 2nd, 2009

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All