Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
05.05.2008 6:05 pm

Potty parity is back again; does it…er, tick you off?

St. Louis Post-Dispatch

Without apology, I present to you (again) the topic of “potty parity.” I took plenty of heat the last time we presented this topic. But I offer it again with head held high.

Why? Well, apparently the state of Missouri’s esteemed legislators felt it was important enough to create legislation around the issue: Equal access to potties in public places.

And it seems that the sparkling new Chaifetz Arena on the SLU campus is in violation of the law — although it has complied with the city’s plumbing code.

The problem? Says our story: “For good measure, they threw in bonus toilets and urinals, hoping to cut down on washroom waits. And in the end, women — no strangers to longer restroom lines at arenas — would have relief. They’d have 17 more potty spots than men.” (Emphasis is mine.)

Before I forget, by the way, this issue isn’t just a Missouri issue. Illinois, California, Maryland and New York are among the states with similar legislation.

So….what bothers you more: The fact that architects and planners can’t just get it right under the law? The fact that there’s a law at all? Or the fact that people get whipped up about the law?

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
35 comments

Comments are closed.

Well, it bugs me that those charged with getting it right CAN’T. How hard IS it to count potties and install them? Or even to just make plans to do so. If they can’t figure out how to help female customers enjoy an event without laws, I guess we need the laws. We have anti-discrimination and affirmative action laws because folks couldn’t do right without them. They don’t follow the laws we have. Folks only complain about them when they affect their unnatural advantages. They don’t complain as much about the conditions that make them necessary.
Guys go to the bathroom anywhere, often before they enter the venue. Sometimes simply against a wall after they are inside. They don’t wash their hands as often (not my opinion, they did studies). So they are in and out unless they find a cute cubicle buddy to conduct wide stances with. Look ladies…quit staying in the johns fixing your makeup, etc. You don’t look much better when you’ve stayed in there 20 minutes adjusting what god didn’t give you. Be considerate and move on out so the next woman can relieve herself.
Now I am wondering what happened in politics today that has us talking about the perfect red herring issue??? LMAO

— Slugger
12:44 pm May 6th, 2008

Tom, you KNOW those wet circles aren’t from strict bathroom issues. Men are kinkier in the restrooms than anyone knows. Where the closeted meet!

— Mike
12:48 pm May 6th, 2008

I wonder if anyone has any real statistics that would indicate a men to women ratio at sporting events? Aside from baseball, I would think that men would out number the women at most events. Don’t take that as a hit to women, that is not the what I mean. I wait in line most of the time at Cardinal and Rams games. Especially if you have to go during any intermissions.

— Tom
12:56 pm May 6th, 2008

Potty parity.

Great.

Don’t we have enough trivial things to worry about?

I’m not even sure how to respond, but I don’t think that we need a law like this. The architects get paid a million bucks to design an arena…if they can’t calculate sufficient bathroom space into their design, then fire them and get a different firm to design it.

— moe
12:57 pm May 6th, 2008

#22 Mike, I won’t go there. I’m one that hates to here music in restrooms in fear that I might tap my feet. Don’t need that problem.

— Tom
1:39 pm May 6th, 2008

Years ago, when I was working for a non-profit, one of my responsibilites was to arrange for workshops. I received copies of the Hotel and Convention magazines.

In one issue there was a time motion study that stated men spend 90 seconds in the public restroom on the average, while women spend 180 seconds (3 minutes) per restroom trip.

Their recommendation was that in planning a large meeting to extend the breaks to at least 20 - 25 minutes so that women stood a chance of getting back in time. Alternatively, to ask when booking meetings what the ratio of women’s facilities was to men’s.

Of course all bets are off at any convention facility booking a predominantly female group.

— RHarnack
1:40 pm May 6th, 2008

Much a doo-doo about nothing. Can the legislators!

— E.
2:23 pm May 6th, 2008

#9 Tom…..no wonder you feel you get in and out of the men’s room faster than women. It seems women have bladders, and apparently, you have a blatter (whatever that is).

Good luck!

— Cathy-M
2:51 pm May 6th, 2008

Cathy, It’s ashame I was a school teacher too. I’m don’t know how I spell my name right sometimes. I looked at that for a long time too. By the way women get out of the men’s room faster because they are in the wrong room. (no wonder you feel you get in and out of the men’s room faster than women)

— Tom
2:57 pm May 6th, 2008

The only parity needed is directly proportional to the average number of folks that attend the events. If 3 million people visit Cardinal games and 70 percent are women, then women should have 70 percent of the toilets in th house. If the number of men attending is higher, then they should receive more stalls. Case closed.

— Amazedbythelunacy
12:54 pm May 8th, 2008

Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 » Show All