Should more casino revenue mean tax cut for St. Charles residents?
The Missouri Legislature last week voted to repeal a state law requiring St. Charles to cut the city property tax rate when the city’s share of Ameristar Casino admission receipts increases above 2007 levels. Gov. Matt Blunt has yet to say whether he will sign or veto the repeal bill. Should the state require the city of St. Charles to give local taxpayers some of its casino revenue in the form of a tax cut - or should the money all be dedicated to city services and salaries and capital improvements?



I would assume the “officials” running the City of St. Charles are elected, and I would assume that the citizens who elected those officials have some degree of trust and confidence in those elected officials.
Why shouldn’t the citizens of Charley Town allow their elected officials to determine where the casino revenues can be best spent?