Is Blunt’s residency program working, or missing the mark?
Here’s the description of a story running today on STLtoday and in Thursday’s Post-Dispatch:
When Gov. Matt Blunt ordered officers to check residency of “criminals” who are arrested, he said his goal was to prevent illegal immigrants from bonding out of jail and committing more crimes. But most of the immigrants caught in Blunt’s net weren’t hardened criminals. They were nabbed for offenses such as speeding and failing to use a turn signal.
He announced the program in a news release from his office on Aug. 27. Read the release here. In part, it says:
Blunt highlighted a tragic murder in Newark where an illegal immigrant, who was previously arrested for child rape and released on bail, was among those charged in the murder of three promising young college students. Identifying the murderer as an illegal immigrant when he was originally arrested could possibly have prevented the murders.
So the question is: Does the program address the problem effectively? Does it matter what “crime” was committed, if it’s targeting illegal immigrants? Does it need more time? Is it missing the mark? Do you believe there’s a problem at all?


Kurt is the director of social media for the Post-Dispatch, where he has worked since August 2002. He's been a journalist since 1982, covering municipal government, courts, education and two hurricanes as a reporter before becoming an editor.
Just reacting to what I’ve read here I’d say it’s purpose is targeting illegals so it doesn’t matter what crime was committed. Being stopped for minor traffic violations has always been a gold mine for catching serious criminals, illegal or not. Carry on with it.