Peanut-free zone: How far should public accommodations go?
We’re writing about the Cardinals and the River City Rascals starting a new section in their stands: The peanut-free zone.
Buy me some … Crackerjack?
According to the news release from the Rascals: “In support of Gateway FEAST (Food allergy, Eczema, and Asthma Support Team), the River City Rascals have designated section 109 during every Wednesday home game as a ‘Peanut-Free Section.’ Here fans with such food allergies can come to a baseball game and avoid the hazards that peanuts can cause on their health.”
The Rascals start the peanut-free section tonight; the Redbirds start a section on July 21.
I am fortunate, as is my family, not to have food allergies to deal with. Believe me, I get how lucky I am. Let’s face it: They can be deadly.
Is this a good idea? How far should public places go to accommodate such issues? Where would it end? What makes this any different from, say, no smoking sections?


Kurt is the director of social media for the Post-Dispatch, where he has worked since August 2002. He's been a journalist since 1982, covering municipal government, courts, education and two hurricanes as a reporter before becoming an editor.
Okay, I get it. No free peanuts.
I think it’s a great idea for the kids who are peanut-alergic. I wish they had a section where they could bring in all the sick kids from Cardinal-Glennon for a game. It’s one thing to have a sick adult, but a sick kid just tugs at the heart a bit more, don’t you think?
I say give them all the allergy-free sections that they need, as long as the demand is there. Attendance is down this year, so I don’t think this is going to affect the average fan, and if it does, oh well. Consider it to be like the Great American Smoke Out, where people give up smoking for a day.
It’s about time people start to suck it up a bit for those less fortunate, and in doing so count their blessings.