Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
07.14.2008 5:04 pm

After Anheuser-Busch, should we brace for the NFL Rams’ departure?

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

The SportsBusiness Journal reports today that the St. Louis Rams “have hired an investment bank to find a group of possible buyers; the Jacksonville Jaguars are once again testing the market; and well-publicized infighting among the five Rooney brothers could imperil their family’s 75-year-ownership of the Pittsburgh Steelers.”

Does it mean that we should be steeling ourselves for another blow to civic pride?

Our follow-up story, which says that Chip Rosenbloom is insisting that the team is not for sale, also notes the following:

Chip Rosenbloom and his sister, Lucia Rodriguez, split the 60 percent ownership they inherited when their mother, Georia Frontiere, died Jan. 18 at age 80 after a lengthy battle with breast cancer. Stan Kroenke retained his 40 percent share of the team. The NFL requires all teams to designate a managing partner, and Rosenbloom is filling that role.

Rosenbloom has been steadfast in declaring his desire to keep the Rams in St. Louis. But his comments never have dismissed the possibility of a sale, presumably to an individual or a group that would agree not to relocate.

On April 25, in his first public appearance here since assuming his new duties, Rosenbloom told reporters at Rams Park, “I think that St. Louis is a great home for the Rams. I think St. Louis is as committed to the Rams as the Rams are committed to St. Louis.”

In May, Yahoo Sports quoted former San Francisco 49ers owner Eddie DeBartolo as saying, “Georgia’s kids have decided to sell the team. I’ve talked to some people who are brokering things, and they’ve told me about the price and what the deal might entail.”

We’ve talked about this topic before, but this is a new development. Is it a development worth worrying about? Are we headed down a path that’s likely to end up in the team’s departure from the Gateway City? Or are the players sincere in wanting to keep the Rams here?

84 comments

Comments are closed.

Gina, let’s not forget that it was Georgia’s greed that got her to leave LA and move to STL. The “kids” should and will do what’s right for them and their families.

— ladont
11:57 am July 15th, 2008

Get ready to buy 2010 version LA Rams jerseys.

— JLE
11:59 am July 15th, 2008

The Rams are as good as gone. We all know nobody tells the truth in these situations.

— Bill
12:13 pm July 15th, 2008

As long as they employ a murderer who can’t seem to learn how to call a cab, I could not care less about the Rams.

— b
12:14 pm July 15th, 2008

Can’t blame the Rams if they leave the Lou.St.louis is becoming a third world ghetto city.The young urban thugs had over run South St.Louis with murder,rape,robbery,drugs and all other types of crime.If I had the money I would leave this sh–hole town in a New York minute.PS-I lived and WORK in St.Louis city my whole life!

— Steve M.
12:25 pm July 15th, 2008

I am always amazed by people like AJ who whine about the City’s 1% tax. New York City “enjoys” a city income tax up to 4% and a state income tax rate up to 8.14% yet they don’t seem to have people or businesses fleeing the city.

— Ladont
12:28 pm July 15th, 2008

AJ,
I totally agree, the problem for the city is that the city’s earnings tax of 1% and the .5% earnings tax on business revenue adds (I believe the last figure I heard) approx. 140 million to the city coffers and they have no other way of making up that income. Disolve the city into the county and you can have a county with much more political might in Washington and Jeff. City. We would be eligible for more highway money, housing funds etc. from the feds, most of these programs are population driven. We would also have more clout in Jeff City. I know someone (immediate family member) that was a state rep for years and he always said that the out state reps always fight against programs, tax breaks, infastructure improvements or anything that benefits the two metro areas in this state if they don’t get equal treatment. They think it should be even stevens and not based on the economic engines of the state.

Wonder why the Rams offices are in Earth City and not downtown, think earnings tax. It is a very digressive tax but as we sit today I don’t know how the city would survive without it.

— kdunlap
12:32 pm July 15th, 2008

Ladont,
Look at downtown Clayton, why do you think it is booming and business moves there instead of downtown St Louis it isn’t because it is easier to get to. The answer is the earnings tax plan and simple.
Centenne was willing to move downtown but the city had agreed to take the earnings tax and somehow use it to benefit Centenne, I don’t remember the details of the agreement anymore.
When Enegizer divested from Purinia they moved to Town and Country, one reason they gave the earnings tax.
New York is a completely different city than most in the US.

— kdunlap
12:38 pm July 15th, 2008

Los Angeles Rams of St. Louis? One way or another…they will again be the Los Angeles Rams. I hope very, very soon. The Rams deserve a monster city for the monster game!

Come back Rams, come back!

— Jesse R
12:47 pm July 15th, 2008

I love the Rams, and it’s been great having an NFL team, especially in the Kurt Warner years…even with the ups and downs.

But let’s be real. The Rams are headed elsewhere, and probably to LA. I’m fine with that. It’s business.

But what I’m NOT fine with is the fact that the taxpayers of MO had to pay millions of bucks for a team that isn’t staying. I think the owners should refund to the taxpayers, the millions they took from us, should the team move.

— moe
1:03 pm July 15th, 2008

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 » Show All