Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
08.07.2008 6:57 am

What would you do about public transportation security?

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

Our story today talks about violent attacks that have occurred around several MetroLink stations caused by roving bands of teens and young adults.

There have been at least three attacks — including an assault by a group of at least 20 on a family near the Forest Park MetroLink station.

And later in the story…

Metro officials said they believe the attacks at the Forest Park and Delmar stations were related, but St. Louis police said they had not connected them. In the Delmar incident, two or three youths were attacked by a large group on the westbound platform at 11:36 p.m. Security tapes show a large group of youths surrounding the victims as they sat on a bench.

One week later, on Saturday night, an employee of the Pi pizza parlor at 6144 Delmar Boulevard was assaulted and robbed of his cell phone at a parking lot across the street near the Pageant theater, police said. Later, a group of youths attacked a restaurant employee near the outdoor dining area.

Police are stepping up security. What would you do about it? Few enough people can use Metro. Does this affect how much use it will get? Would you be dissuaded from using public transportation because of reports like this?

92 comments

Comments are closed.

If I have learned one thing, you are basically not safe anywhere. You can’t count on having a police substation in a mall to protect you from some idiot who decides to bring in a gun and use it. You can’t depend on security cameras in a parking lot to keep a thug from grabbing your purse, wallet or worse. The metro link is no different. You just have to assume that a crime could take place at anytime and if you choose to take public transportation you should try to do it in numbers. Carry mace, carry a whistle, keep your cell phone fully charged, learn some basic self defense moves and pray for the best.
We can’t live in a box.

— Gina
8:37 am August 7th, 2008

One of my co-workers said he was on the Grand bus after work not to long ago,and an argument broke out between an older”gentleman” and a young “Thundercat”.They were screaming and cussing at each other,than they both pull out guns at each other.The bus driver stop the bus ,and everyone ran off the bus like a bunch of cock roaches being chase by a can of Raid.Luckily no guns were fired off,but I will still drive my GMC Safari to work and where ever else I need to go to.

— Steve M.
8:44 am August 7th, 2008

Where is Bernie Getz when you need him????

— havetolaugh
8:48 am August 7th, 2008

Solution? Concealed weapons.

I lost a bit of respect for Joe Edwards because of his comment. All attacks are serious.

— Scott_Simon
8:53 am August 7th, 2008

WebsterMark, you’re on the right track (no pun intended) when bringing up the question but it’s a question for a topic far bigger than this article. Their race is not the issue in regards to how best to provide security on the metrolink unless it is used in the context of racial profiling. For instance, it would be important to know what the race of the thugs are so that the police can better identify potential problems when large groups of this race are seen walking around The Loop and at Metrolink stations. Of course, liberals and their ACLU buddies would hate this because safety is not an issue for them…but protecting thugs rights are.

Now, to the bigger question you posed: if this was a group of 20-100 white thugs I would agree with you that it would make front page news or, in the very least, it would be duly noted in the news story.

Race plays a very large part as to why metrolink has been voted down in St. Charles and, a few years ago, in Edwardsville/Glen Carbon/Collinsville. There was a perceived notion that a bad element would be brought to those cities via the metrolink. If you follow the history of Union Station and now Saint Louis Galleria, this perception could be valid. Metrolink killed Union Station as it brought over large groups of youths from East St. Louis. Union Station eventually had to implement their infamous dress code policy (remember Nelly not being allowed in?) due to all the thugs. I haven’t been there in years but it was ghost town for years because the thugs from East St. Louis took over. Saint Louis Galleria had to implement a youth restricted policy on the weekends because of the large groups of trouble-makers that were coming over from the metrolink. (They also came over to SLG when Tropicana Bowling instituted an admission fee for non-bowlers). I have used the terms thugs here but to be even more blunt: black youths. You can sugarcoat it all you want, but black youths (typically males, 13-22) seem to be the troublemakers in all these areas.

Stonger police presence and profiling will help to keep metrolink (and the malls) safe for all.

— Logicprevails
8:55 am August 7th, 2008

While I agree that law-abiding citizens should be allowed to carry concealed weapons for protection (this is an ideal situation for that right), I must point out the fact that a family returning from vaction in Puerto Rico who has yet to reach their car would not be carrying a weapon, not unless we also change the laws for air travel (which won’t be happening anytime soon).

— JNOnSTL
8:59 am August 7th, 2008

i’m off to the airport for a two day business trip. I will not be taking the Metrolink to Lambert…..

When I read that “roving groups of youths” are common around the Loop and the police are basically powerless to stop it, it reminded me of the stories coming out of Paris two years ago and the ‘roving groups of youths’ and the fact France had handcuffed itself and was powerless to stop them either. Those roving gangs were Muslim immigrants but no one in Paris wanted to say that either. They were called disenfranchised youths. They weren’t attacking other Muslims….

— WebsterMark
9:03 am August 7th, 2008

To go back to the original question…I would not be riding Metrolink in that area at that time of night. I would have cabbed it home from the airport. I used to ride from Shrewsbury to CWE to work during the day hours and never had any trouble, BUT, definitely some situations that COULD have become troublesome. I quit riding but not because of security issues, but rather convenience issues.

Race does have something to do with gangs of people in the city. DUH.

— Momof1girl
9:20 am August 7th, 2008

I think whether it’s a group of 20 white or black teens walking around, it’s not a good thing. We can also look at the media reaction to an Amber Alert of a white girl and a black girl…Some things aren’t fair, now let’s move forward.

The honor system is still a good idea, here’s why: Building elaborate stations where city employee(s) do nothing but sit on their butts and make sure someone pays their $2 bucks, is a waste of tax dollars. Use that money for increasing security. You may get a someone who doesn’t pay, but in the long run, you will get more riders because it will be a safer way to travel.

About St. Charles: I think it’s good they voted down the Metrolink, here’s why: When someone moves to St. Charles, they are making a sincere effort to move away from scary minorities. It wouldn’t be fair.

One more thing, all of you saying, “I WILL NEVER RIDE THE METROLINK AGAIN.” Fine, don’t.

— Eric
9:30 am August 7th, 2008

You’re naive if you think that race doesn’t figure into these assaults. If 20 white youths attack a black family of 5 (”Let’s get them!”), it surely constitutes a hate crime, which falls under federal law. Do we really think that being black immunizes oneself from racism? This was an unprovoked, brutal, hate crime on an innocent family simply because of race. The sooner we recognize this, the sooner the *entire* St. Louis community can begin to respond. This wasn’t just boys being boys, people…

— Chris
9:42 am August 7th, 2008

Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 » Show All