Seatbelt law in cars, helmet law in motorcycles: Is there a difference?
We have a small story on the site today about how more than 100 drivers were ticketed on Monday in St. Louis County for not buckling up.
Police are enforcing a county ordinance that allows them to ticket drivers in unincorporated areas for not wearing a seat belt.
Elsewhere in the state, police may only ticket a driver for not buckling up when the driver has been pulled over for something else.
What do you think of the seat-belt laws? Some people on this board espouse a philosophy that government should leave us alone and let us be in our own homes and cars. On the other hand, studies say seat belts save lives, so does government have a legitimate role in advocating that level of safety?
Meanwhile, the same debates swirl around the laws that require helmets on motorcycles (Missouri has such a law; Illinois doesn’t). What’s the difference? Or is there a difference?


Kurt is the director of social media for the Post-Dispatch, where he has worked since August 2002. He's been a journalist since 1982, covering municipal government, courts, education and two hurricanes as a reporter before becoming an editor.
I agree totally with DonPat. The same people who scream that the Evil Government is infringing on their right to be stupid are the first to scream “Workmen’s Comp,” “Malpractice,” and “Disability,” then lean on insurers to cover every imaginable ache or pain.
Loki03 — Don’t get mad at JohnH. Those of us who have read his rants on this blog for ages know when he’s off his meds, and when his fantasies are the most fanciful. It’s just Johnh being Johnh….he can’t help himself. He was an abused child and the lobotomy didn’t take.
Oh — I forgot — WELCOME BACK ROBSMYTHE!