Could we get better cars if we gave automakers a bailout?
One of the interesting lines in today’s story about the congressional hearings on an automaker bailout:
Chrysler CEO Bob Nardelli promised that his company, recipient of a previous government-subsidized rescue loan in the 1970s that it repaid, would repay taxpayers by 2012 and would devote itself to manufacturing “fuel-efficient cars and trucks that people want to buy.”
I take it as a given that the government would get its money back (read: WE would get OUR money back) if we gave automakers a bailout. It’s happened that way ever time the government’s given a bailout.
I also realize there’s heavy sentiment among some quarter NOT to give a bailout.
But if we DID give Detroit the bailout the car-makers are seeking, would we get better cars out of the deal? Would that be worth it? More fuel efficiency, better competition with foreign car-makers?


Kurt is the director of social media for the Post-Dispatch, where he has worked since August 2002. He's been a journalist since 1982, covering municipal government, courts, education and two hurricanes as a reporter before becoming an editor.
I know the mayor of Fenton favors the buyout, but I always consider that city when I think of automakers. Chrysler has cried and cried for concessions and Fenton has abliged. Within two years of the last blackmail move by Chrysler, they are bailing on Fenton and moving jobs to Canada.
I have no confidence that American automakers will do what they say. If somehow they do stumble upon a better car, it will be built outside the United States. The American automakers are very similar to the airline industry. A successful business model is staring them in the face and they continue to ignore it.
Liars and thieves.