Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
06.05.2008 3:59 pm

Did we overplay Rezko to hurt Obama?

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

A caller today said we erred in putting the Rezko guilty verdict (”Rezko guilty verdict resonates”) at the top of today’s Post-Dispatch front page. That headline stretched across five columns.

She said the story about Obama’s historic candidacy (“Obama’s triumph lifts hopes of blacks”) should have led the paper. It ran as a one-column display, half of its headline appearing below the fold.

The day before, the front page was dominated by the story of Obama securing enough delegates to clinch the Democratic nomination. “America, this is our moment,” the lead headline quoted Obama – two lines across four columns at the top of the page.

Still, the caller said, today’s Obama story should have been at the top as well.

She said we ran the Rezko story at the top to diminish Obama. Even though Obama is not accused of any wrong-doing in matters related to the trial, some believe Rezko’s conviction will prove to be heavy political baggage.

(Seems like far greater baggage for Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich, but the caller dismissed the importance of that. It was Obama we were out to tarnish, she said.)

21 comments

Comments are closed.

Generally speaking “Birds of a feather flock together.” Did Hussein not buy his house from Rezko at a redueced Price. Did he not have Rezko as his fund raiser? Does he not come from the Chicago arena of politics. The past two governors are incarcerated. The current one is under federal investigation.

— johnh
6:33 am June 6th, 2008

Not yet, and I do not believe you will. That would not be professional journalism.

Trust Obama when he says he can not and should not be defined by his associations or what is said by others. He is his own man.

Of course, I expect the same when someone compares McCain to a Bush third term.

— Scott K.
7:24 am June 6th, 2008

I’m sorry johnh, who is Hussein? I didn’t see anyone by that name mentioned in the story…

I don’t think the story warranted banner placement, but it WAS probably a front page story, since it affects our neighboring state of Illinois.

— Sarah D.
9:47 am June 6th, 2008

Diminish him more. Repeat it over, and over again. And while you’re playing it, also mention that Obama openly opposes legislation protecting live aborted babies as he fears such a law might infringe on women’s rights or abortionists’ rights. Make me vomit, Barry Hussein.

— Scott
11:02 am June 6th, 2008

Now Scott, Obama just doesn’t want his daughters’ “punished by a baby.” It would be much more convenient to them to just kill the little things.

— Amazedbythelunacy
12:09 pm June 6th, 2008

I see JohnH has the feathers and chicken bones in his hands again. You Squaw! Offensive enough? I gots more if you do. This childish mangling of Obama’s name is getting old boys…Scott…I see you’ve jumped in to play too. Very unamerican. Study again what this country stands for. Of course you are pulling those headlines out to nail Obama’s rep. It’s sick and sad. Especially since you didn’t report the many decades of white males who cheated the peoples of Illinois. This good old boy corrupt crap isn’t new. You media types are like ET and NE nowadays. Level playing fields scare some of you. If you had dug a bit deeper, you would know the respect Obama has from both sides of the political aisle (as does Hillary). Those who listen to sound bites and want validation of their fears and stupidity will jump on your headlines as fact. It’ll all come out at trial. But some will still have their prejudices. My only comfort is the small-minded are largely impotent since their influence is small. This is not new, but it is more pervasive as media outlets swipe their material from subscription “news” sites.

— Slugger
12:15 pm June 6th, 2008

Hey Amazed…are you going to go fight and relieve the women fighting your wars when the draft kicks in? There will be a draft if the repubs get in. I look forward to seeing you and your kids march off soon! We kill babies later in life here. Kids are dying to avenge the deaths of those who stole american capital and decent lives by selling bad paper to foreign countries. Yet you feel they shouldn’t be miffed by our thievery.

— Slugger
12:18 pm June 6th, 2008

As an old mun once said, If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament. Many of you against it wouldn’t hesitate to use the procedure if you knocked up your mistress and you faced divorce costs. And you know it. It’s one of the few ways you can still control women, yet you support practices that kill older folks daily. Idiotos!
And yes, your headlines were timed to hurt Obama. These are not new corruptions.

— Pia
12:22 pm June 6th, 2008

You know how the Red Sox were like America’s underdog team and everyone loved them…and then they won the world series and their fans became pretentious, spoiled and just plain obnoxious, much like their counterparts in NY? I’m starting to get the same feeling about the Obama supporters. I’m really trying to like the guy (and I agree that the middle name attack is pretty freakin lame), but his supporters are getting out of hand! I didn’t buy the whole messiah complex thing…but now I’m starting to wonder.

— chuckweaver
12:27 pm June 6th, 2008

Did the Post-Dispatch overplay Rezko to hurt Obama?

Not by a long shot.

For the most part, the coverage seemed to be relatively small stories several pages into the paper.

Now, let’s say Rezko had somehow been tied to George W. Bush in exactly the same manner. Then, I’d imagine, the Rezko affair(or Rezko-Bush Scandal, as I’d imaagine it would have become known…) would have been front page news for months and would have been held forth as a shining example of the “Republican Culture of Corruption” or some such nonsense.

So no, I don’t think you overplayed Rezko. I think you underplayed Rezko.

— James
12:57 pm June 6th, 2008

Of course an Obam supporter would take a one sided view of the topic. I wouldn’t expect any difference from a McCain role reversal. (As a note, the caller would probably have had issue with not running more top articles of a McCain “scandal”). That being said, Obama got the top spot the day before. This was no new news, Rezko was. Now, if you run 40 front page stories for consecutive days like the NY Times did on Abu Ghraib (absent new news mind you), then you’ll be seeking to harm Obama. In this case all you have is an ideological caler who would probably prefer that a positive Obama story headlines every paper from now until November. You must go with the most news worthy article, completely regardless of politics.

— RCJ
1:10 pm June 6th, 2008

Stop Whining. Obama has a 20 year relationship with this crook so he should be tied in with him. Obama has a very troubling history of having long-term relationships with racists and crooks. If he is elected presidenet, this is exactly what we will get. So, get over it Obama babies. Perhaps if Obama had better judgement, then none of the past three damaging relationships of his would not be in the media. Obama is open to be critized just the same amount as W is. So shut up and stop your whining.

— Ryan
1:18 pm June 6th, 2008

I lost my decoder ring, can someone translate Slugger?

— Amazedbythelunacy
1:51 pm June 6th, 2008

i agree with the news judgment of the post on this one. with most reader complaints i read on here, it appears that the person was clearly a supporter of one side (Obama), and unable to see the news value in the story on the rezko verdict. Yet, instead of thinking as a reporter, they simply view it as an intentional slam of the next president of the united states. come now…..

and to JohnH— unless Jim Edgar’s part-time teaching job at the U of I in champaign is considered prison, I don’t think the past two governors of Illinois are incarcerated.

— nick
2:26 pm June 6th, 2008

Actually, the Post-Dispatch returned to its’ more traditional standard with the Rezko headling above the fold, and, just below the fold we are back into a baseball story. My suspicion is that if the Rezko decision had not come out, the bnaseball story would have been above the fold.

Rezko was the fund raiser for several figures in Illinois, the main one being the present Governor.

— RHarnack
2:27 pm June 6th, 2008

Johnh, Senator Obama did not buy his house from Rezko, he bought a piece of property adjacent from Rezko. I actually did read the whole story.

— RHarnack
2:29 pm June 6th, 2008

Actually, the baseball story about “Prince” Joe Henry and the Negro League honors wouldn’t have migrated to the top of the page. Our decision was whether to play the Rezko story or the Obama story at the top. We went with the newsier story.

— Steve Parker
2:46 pm June 6th, 2008

I have been long term resident of Illinois. Chicago and Illinois politics has a long history of massive corruption. While nothing has been proven on Obama’s involvement in the Rezko case, investigative reporters should be all over the Chicago/IL politics of Obama. Where there is smoke there usually is fire. Every newspaper worth its salt should keep this story as front page material.

— wfzimme
3:00 pm June 6th, 2008

First of all, since the PD has endorsed Obama, I don’t know where the caller gets the notion that the PD would try to hurt his candidacy. Second, Obama’s name and association with Rezko was not in the headline. Since many readers are from Illinois and the possible link to their Gov. plus the presidential nominee, I would have been upset had this not been the headline.
Harnack, this story may add a little to your theory. Of course, this trial report did include Obama which the PD said they didn’t have room to print that day. Yeah, right. So, ma’m, your theory is incorrect. The PD is doing all they can not to link Obama and Rezko. Sorry to burst your little bubble.
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/rezko-witness-leaves-new-questions-about-obama-real-estate-deal-unanswered/

— A CENTRIST
3:13 pm June 6th, 2008

Senator Obama is not above criticism. The Post-Dispatch did not try to hurt him through the coverage of the Rezko trial. Talk show hosts such as Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity dedicate entire shows to attacking Senator Obama. It is for this reason that every other item reported looks like overplay. For those of you who get your news from the “Stop Obama Express” or “Operation Chaos,” I must say with all due respect, you’re an idiot.

Senator Obama has not been implicated in any of Rezko’s illegal activities. The charges against Bill Ayers were dropped due to prosecutorial misconduct. Michelle Obama saying that for the first time in her adult life, she is proud of her country is no different than statements by Condeleeza Rice saying that Senator Obama’s nomination means that “We The People” finally includes all of us.

— Sean
3:16 pm June 6th, 2008

Johnh,

Do you have no shame at all concerning the appearance of stupidity on your part by your continuous reference to Obama as Hussein?

— D. Walker
9:53 pm June 7th, 2008