Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
08.05.2008 4:26 pm

Miss the readers’ advocate?

St. Louis Post-Dispatch

The Louisville Courier-Journal has become the latest paper to drop its “public editor.” The Post-Dispatch dropped its readers’ advocate position seven years ago.

Louisville’s Pam Platt wrote a farewell column Sunday. The Courier-Journal 40 years ago became the nation’s first newspaper to have an ombudsman. But it’s late in the game at ending the role.

As newspapers face a battery of financial challenges, staff reductions have led many papers to eliminate the role of ombudsman or readers’ advocate. In the past few months, Platt notes, the position was axed at the Baltimore Sun, Fort Worth Star-Telegraph, Orlando Sentinel, Minneapolis Star-Tribune, Hartford Courant and the Palm Beach Post.

The Post-Dispatch has been without a readers’ advocate since 2001, when the position was dropped during a newsroom reorganization. (The Post-Dispatch had a full-time readers’ advocate, who wrote a weekly column, from 1974 to 1995. The position was vacant for four years, then filled for two years, before officially ending.)

When the position was dropped here, all staffers were told that they were expected to serve as readers’ advocates. That’s why reporters’ phone numbers and emails appear at the end of their stories. That’s why “contact boxes” appear on the second page of each section listing the names and phone numbers of editors.

Do you think there’s a drop in accountability when the ombudsman’s role is eliminated?

6 comments

Comments are closed.

Steve, I e-mailed you with an error in the front page and I got an out of the office auto-response this morning.
Anyway,I have spoken to the editors several times about getting an advocate. Some of the people are great and respond and others just ignore you and others are impossible to get ahold of such as Mr. Goodman. They all remind of the school principal. They and their teachers never do anything wrong. It is not possible to have a rational discussion with many at the Post, especially Tim Poor and Pam Maples. She just whines that I am “yelling” when I am not. They always have a stupid excuse for everything.
It is so tiresome.
I complain a lot and get nowhere. It is extremely disheartening. You would think a paper going down the crapper would listen to someone who is trying to help them. Go figure!
There is absolutely no accountability at the PD. If you ask who is responsible for something, everybody points at each other. No progress from the progressives at the P-D is ever made to better the paper. The same people continue to do the same horrible things time after time. Erregeous errors such as printing letters to the editor calling Republicans names goes on time after time and I get excuse after excuse.
Having no ombusdman is like leaving your teenage kids at home for a week while you are out of town and expecting them to take care of things.

— A CENTRIST
9:52 pm August 5th, 2008

If the P-D had an ombudsman, perhap we could find out why this story is not being covered by the PD:
http://www.slate.com/id/2196758/#whycover

— A CENTRIST
10:05 pm August 5th, 2008

Is there a chance you are going to bring back an ombudsman?

— Renee
11:11 pm August 5th, 2008

I FEEL VERY MUCH LIKE THE CENTRIST, ONE COMPLAINS BUT NO ONE LISTENS OR CARES. THE CURRENT PAPER IS SET UP FOR THE ADVERTISERS, NOT THE READERS. EVERYTHING THAT YOU HAVE DONE IS TO GET MORE ROOM FOR ADVERTISERS. WHEN YOU PUT SPORTS ON THE FRONT PAGE YOU REMOVE THE SAME AMOUNT OF SPACE FOR NEWS AND GIVE US LESS INFORMATION. ONE WOULD THINK ARE IS NO NEWS TO PRINT. AN OMBUDSMAN MIGHT HELP, BUT ONLY IF YOU LISTEN.

— JOE OGLE
4:58 am August 6th, 2008

No answer to my above question. I’m guessing there is no intention of bringing back an ombudsman, so why would you even ask the question?

— Renee
4:36 pm August 7th, 2008

Renee,
Sorry for the slow response. There are no plans to restore the readers’ advocate position. Given the two rounds of newsroom buyouts in recent years, an ombudsman seems very much a luxury. We still operate under the expectation that all Post-Dispatch staffers are expected to respond to reader comments and inquiries. There are some limits: People who fire daily volleys of emails or make calls every day with the same complaint won’t get a response to each.(One gentleman leaves voice messages on the phones of several editors every morning calling us the St. Louis Post-Disgrace. He doesn’t leave a number.)

— Steve Parker
4:55 pm August 7th, 2008