Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
01.08.2009 12:28 pm

Are photos in the Post-Dispatch the right size?

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

The Chicago Tribune has told readers that it will make adjustments in its recent redesign based on feedback it’s getting.

In an article Thursday, the industry journal Editor & Publisher characterized  the Tribune’s note to readers this way:

“In an extraordinary mea culpa wrapped around its A-section Thursday, the Chicago Tribune acknowledged that its much-ballyhooed redesign was a flop with many readers.”

The Chicago Tribune denied any mea cupla and said E&P was off-base.  The Trib’s editor said:

… We’re proud of the redesigned Chicago Tribune and the value it brings to both our readers and advertisers every day. Our redesign has been a tremendous success.

“We weren’t apologizing. We were thanking readers for their input and assuring them that it mattered. That’s what successful customer-focused businesses do.”

One area of criticism concerned the size of photos.

According to E&P:

“Many readers dislike the Tribune’s new practice of using large front-page photographs. ‘Some people found this disorienting,’ the Tribune said. ‘On top of that, we didn’t get everything right the first time.’ But it said even if that ‘unsettles some readers,’ that big displays of photos would continue.”

“‘Our photojournalists are among the best in the world, and we are displaying their work more prominently,’ the Tribune said. ‘At the same time, size doesn’t always equate with worth. Therefore, we are being more rigorous in editing photos so their use is commensurate with their value.’”

Granted, this is an entirely unscientific survey here. But if  you’re a regular reader of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, draw on your recollection of photos in the paper, day in and day out, and let us know:

For the most part, photos in the Post-Dispatch usually are

View Results

Loading ... Loading …
4 comments

Comments are closed.

A photograph should cover only the column inches that your sales department didn’t sell on a given page. Remember its 60/40 at least. Photos are the cheapest was of filling unsold space.

The ideal newspaper would be 100 percent advertising, and nothing else.

I have no peer when it comes to selling. I had never sold newspaper space until I was in Hawaii on A vacation. The Maui News was having their 125th anniversary. Colin Cameron, the owner, wanted to do something special.

On a bet with him, I spent 3 days in the Maui News skimming through past editions. I bet him I could sell 125 pages of advertising for a special section at double the column inch rate. The 125 pages took me 2 days. I sold another 125 pages in 3 more days. I entitled it “Pages from the Past”
They started with a page in 1898 (left) and a full page Advertisement on the right AT DOUBLE THEIR COLUMN INCH RATE.

Have you ever seen a 500 page special edition?

Yes, we all made out like bandits.

— johnh
3:42 pm January 8th, 2009

Since the vote mechanism doesn’t work, I will leave my opinion. I think the PD pictures are always too large, generally too stupid, and for the most part unnecessary and unwanted. I simply want the news. I get a catchy photo on the front page, but today is perfect example. Why the big photo of a guy sucking on a sucker?

Yesterday we needed two photos of skaters? Geez! If you had lots of room for news and not enough news to fill the pages I could see the excess, but you have very little room for news.

— A CENTRIST
8:32 pm January 8th, 2009

Considering that E&P completely blew this story, I might skip making it the foundation for a argument against the Tribune. Now onto the P-D. umm… size is rarely the issue, its the photo editing. So, if you have strong photo editing, then the size will take care of itself.

— designhawg
10:27 am January 9th, 2009

Designhawg:
Thanks for noting the Trib’s response to the E&P article. I’ve adjusted this blog entry to reflect that. The part about photo size is largely direct quotes from the paper’s note to readers. So I think the question about photo size stands up.

— Steve Parker
2:33 pm January 9th, 2009