Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
05.24.2009 11:43 am

Figuring out which plastic bottles can leach controversial chemical

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

A story about hard plastic drinking bottles containing bisphenol A leaching notable amounts of the controversial chemical into people’s bodies that appeared on page A1 of Friday’s Post-Dispatch raised questions from readers as to exactly which bottles had BPA.

One reader wanted to know if the chemical could be found in disposable plastic bottles, such as those holding soft drinks and water. The answer is, no. The bottles in question are the hard plastic type that are reusable and are generally sold empty.

Of specific concern has been the use of the chemical in the manufacture of baby bottles and sippy cups. Hundreds of studies have linked the chemical to breast and prostate cancer, diabetes, heart disease and other health problems. The studies have shown young children to be especially susceptible to the effects of BPA.

However, the Boston Globe story points out “BPA is used in hundreds of everyday products. It is used to make reusable, hard plastic bottles more durable and to help prevent corrosion in canned goods such as soup and infant formula.”

So exactly which products have BPA packaging is a little hard to trace. This is why some cities and states have decided to ban the sale of some products using BPA. Chicago earlier this month enacted a ban of baby bottles and sippy cups that have BPA, following a similar action carried out by the state of Minnesota. Other cities, including Boston, are looking at similar measures.

Some retailers, including Wal-Mart, already have vowed to stop selling bottles and containers made with BPA, the Chicago Tribune reports. Some manufacturers, including the nation’s leading baby-bottle makers, also have started to market products labeled as “BPA-free.”

While BPA is not found in disposable water bottles you buy at the store, a report on the U.S. News and World Report’s website points out that other chemicals can be found in those bottles.

Deborah Kotz, a senior writer for the magazine, wrote in her blog that a new study from Goethe University in Germany found 78 percent of the samples taken from plastic disposable water bottles contained etrogen like compounds, still unidentified, that “could have the same harmful effects of BPA.”

But Kotz also points out that the study found the same compounds in 33 percent of the samples taken from water sold in glass bottles.

Patricia Hunt, a reproductive biologist and geneticist at Washington State University, told Kotz that the chemicals could have shown up in the glass bottles because the water itself may have contained the chemicals even before bottling.

“Birth control pills, hormone therapy medications, and a host of contaminants can all get into our water supply, and we haven’t figured out a way to aaffordably filter them out,” Hunt said.

6 comments

Comments are closed.

This is just the tip of the iceberg. We put creams on our bodies containing mineral oil and petroleum, shampoo with sulphates, eat foods with high fructuse corn syrup and hydrogenated oils and God knows what else that is bad for us, yet the government allows companies to continue to make these things. Why?

— A CENTRIST
8:53 pm May 24th, 2009
— A CENTRIST
2:58 pm May 25th, 2009

Because not everyone is in agreement on the potential harm caused by polycarbonate bottles, and the leaching and exposure varies widely. Harm to small body weight children, nursing mothers, etc.,perhaps but there are plenty of things in that category.

Also: a typical polycarbonate water bottle costs $2-3 wholesale (as for imprinting)and $4-5 retail in most places. “BPA-free” alternatives cost 2X or 3X that much. (Check out a sporting goods store near you.) By the way, if you wear plastic eyeglasses…that’s polycarbonate, too. BTW Mr. or Ms. Centrist: rock products aren’t necessarily bad for you…where did you get the idea they were? You need sulfur (sulphates) to live. And besides that– none of the things you mention are bad in small quantities.

— Teresa
5:40 pm May 25th, 2009

How about we focus on the larger, out of control, issue of plastic in the environment the floating trash pile the size of Texas in the middle of the Pacific Ocean? We’re not allowed to talk about that because the typical Post Dispatch reader claims that humans don’t have the ability to alter the Earth. That the Earth is sooooo humongous it is impossible for humans to have any impact whatsoever. Plastic bottles have a HUGE cost. They clog up the sewers and kill wildlife. Plastic bottles are a menace and Americans are not just a dirty people, they are filthy dirty people. Trash is everywhere and it’s destroying the quality of life on the planet. Any more I really am inclined to go with the Elite’s plan and wish that billions of humans die. I really find little of any value in other Americans. They’re pretty much repulsive, self-centered, animals with little or no redeeming value.

— How about
7:21 pm May 25th, 2009

How about…. I hope that “how about” doesn’t have a gun… for the sake of us animals out here!

— verbose
8:19 pm May 25th, 2009

The solution is obvious. Immediately require the feds to ban all food products from solid containers. From now on, keep and slaughter your own animals, grow your own produce, and drink only what you can collect from rainfall or a certified well.

While you’re outside doing all these things, try not to breathe the air or allow any sunlight to reach bare skin.

— Merc Man
7:28 am May 26th, 2009