Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
11.19.2008 10:28 am

Washington U. Chancellor will take a voluntary pay cut and says capital projects will be delayed

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

Washington University will slow faculty salary increases, delay or eliminate some capital projects, and limit administrative hiring in light of the economic crisis, Chancellor Mark Wrighton wrote in an email to the university community this morning.

Wrighton said he has even volunteered to take a 5 percent salary cut on January 1, followed by another 5 percent reduction on July 1. According to the annual survey by the Chronicle of Higher Education, Wrighton made $510,250 in base salary in 2006, and his total compensation was $738,242. (In addition, he also makes more than $360,000 from serving on two corporate boards.)

A handful of other university presidents around the country have made similar moves in recent months — waiving bonuses or donating raises back to their institutions — given the economic downturn. For example, in late September, the president of the University of Connecticut declined what would have likely been a $100,000 bonus.

In his email, Wrighton said that deans and vice chancellors have volunteered to take no pay increases in the year ahead. In addition, he said the university is planning on lower salary increases this year for faculty than in years past.

Wrighton notes that since July 1, the university’s endowment has declined 25 percent. So he expects a significant reduction in spending from the endowment in the future. Other financial difficulties facing the university that he cites include the leveling off of research support, constraints on increasing the rate of tuition, uncertain prospects of philanthropic giving, health care costs, and the prospects of increased needs for financial aid.

As for the capital projects, Wrighton said the $20 million renovation of the Mallinckrodt Center will be “delayed indefinitely” and the redevelopment of the South 40 will be slowed. However, he said that two projects underway will be completed — the BJC Institute of Health and the Stephen F. and Camilla T. Brauer Hall.

Finally, new administrative hiring will be “very limited and require considerable additional justification,” Wrighton wrote. Some new hires which have already received “soft approval” may even be eliminated or delayed.

On Monday, the University of Missouri system announced a hiring freeze at all of its four campuses.

I have copied Wrighton’s full letter below:

November 19, 2008


To the Washington University Community,


Next week we will pause for the great American tradition of Thanksgiving. The Washington University family has much to be thankful for, including a wonderful community of talented students, great faculty, outstanding staff, highly successful and supportive alumni, and many, many friends. Thanksgiving is a time to reflect on our many blessings, to relax, and to enjoy family and friends.


But this Thanksgiving season will be difficult for many, and I am concerned about the hardships members of our community are facing, including our students and their families. Our entire country faces enormous and immediate challenges stemming from rapid deterioration in the economy that resulted in sharp employment declines; significant losses in the value of investments held by individuals, foundations, and institutions; and anxiety about what lies ahead. Washington University, as strong as we are, is not immune to the changes of the last several months.


Washington University is blessed with financial strength. However, the value of the invested assets of the University has declined considerably during the months since the start of this fiscal year (FY09) that began on July 1, 2008. Since July 1, the value of the endowment has declined approximately 25%. The Board of Trustees will set the spending rate from the endowment for the next fiscal year, and I anticipate a significant reduction from the amount we had previously been planning for FY10. With the decline in the value of our endowment, coupled with leveling of research support, constraint on the rate of tuition growth, uncertain prospects for philanthropic support, pressures on healthcare costs, and the prospect of increased needs for financial aid, we must take some actions to assure that our University remains strong into the future. Whatever the origins and whatever the length of the economic decline, it is important to respond to this new environment. We will constrain the growth of administrative expenses, compensation expenses, and commitments to new building projects.


To our talented students, you are a principal reason for our existence, and we are fortunate you selected us for your education, whether you are in your first year as an undergraduate or working toward your graduate or professional degree. We have a commitment to you, and we have the strong desire for you to complete your degree program here and join the ranks of other successful Washington University alumni around the country and around the world. Each of you has the potential to complete your degree here, and we do not want your financial challenges to preclude a successful outcome. Education is at the heart of what we do, and we will do our best to meet your needs.


To our faculty and staff, you have contributed significantly to the rise in quality, visibility, and impact of the University. Our students and alumni can count your commitments and achievements as blessings. I am thankful to each of you for your creative and dedicated work. Unfortunately, as we consider the financial environment within which we are working, the traditional financial rewards associated with hard work and achievement will be limited.


For FY10 we will not be able to sustain past levels of salary increases, and we are planning lower increases in compensation this year. The Vice Chancellor for Human Resources will be working with all supervisors to encourage that compensation increases, in general, be higher for those who are lower in total compensation. I have discussed these matters with the Chair of the Board of Trustees, and I proposed and will implement a reduction of my own salary by 5% effective January 1, 2009 and another 5% reduction effective July 1, 2009. School Deans and Vice Chancellors have volunteered to have no increase in their compensation in the year ahead. These leaders have been asked to review carefully the compensation of their faculty and staff and to assure that their programmatic plans for FY10 can be achieved with realistic expectations of revenue. All Vice Chancellors have been asked to reduce the rate of growth of administrative expenses as we plan for FY10 and to identify opportunities for expense reductions in the current year.


While we must exercise restraint in compensation and administrative expenses, it will be vital to continue to attract and retain key members of the faculty and staff and to provide financial resources to do so when needed. It is imperative that we remain in a position to add people to maintain momentum in improving our quality and impact, to secure philanthropic support for the University, and to continue our progress in improving gender balance and building greater representation of members of minority groups. We also may need to apply new resources to initiatives that will contribute to our future strength, including in areas such as exceptionally promising academic initiatives, compliance, safety and security.


Our programs are strong now and must remain so. New staff additions in the administration will be very limited and require considerable additional justification. New additions to the administrative staff of the central administration must have approval of a committee that includes Executive Vice Chancellors Henry S. Webber, Chairman, and Michael R. Cannon, and Vice Chancellors Barbara A. Feiner and Ann B. Prenatt. Open positions will be reviewed and this same group will determine whether such positions will be filled. New, recurring and one-time commitments to expand the central administration for FY10, some of which have already received “soft approval,” are being reviewed and may be eliminated, scaled back, or delayed to reduce the rate of growth of expenses.


It is also important for us to scale back, eliminate, or delay capital projects. For example, planned renovation and expansion of Mallinckrodt Center at a cost of over $20 million will be delayed indefinitely. The redevelopment of the South 40 will be slowed. New capital projects for schools will be required to have a much larger fraction of the costs assured in the form of philanthropic contributions before construction begins, rather than relying on accumulated reserves. Reserves may well be needed to address financial aid and other future needs.


Two capital projects already underway must be completed. The BJC Institute of Health will be finished in late 2009 and will provide much needed space to respond to research opportunities in medicine in connection with our BioMed 21 initiative. Stephen F. and Camilla T. Brauer Hall will be completed and open in the late summer of 2010 to enable us to expand education and research in biomedical engineering as well as in energy, environment and sustainability. Both of these capital projects will enable the expansion of programs to uncover new knowledge that will respond to critical challenges we face as a nation. In addition, halting or slowing these projects would end up costing us more in the long run.


To our loyal alumni, parents, and friends, we thank you for your support and encouragement. Many of you have been financially supportive in the past, and that support has secured for us the financial strength to be flexible at this time of uncertainty. Your support has provided a large endowment for financial aid, for faculty professorships, for programs, and for facilities. We have flourished because you have helped us. In addition, through your own accomplishments and association with Washington University, you have encouraged others to view Washington University more favorably. Many among you have encouraged prospective students to explore Washington University for their higher education. At this time of Thanksgiving, I count you as key among our many blessings, and it is my hope that these challenging times are not too adverse for you and your families.


To all who are in the Washington University community, I have several requests. First, let’s be supportive of each other. These are not easy times. Befriending those in need at this time can be very meaningful. For those who are able, please continue to support us financially, with special emphasis on support of our scholarship programs. Second, if you are in a situation where you see employment opportunities for the talented students and alumni of the University, please contact us to make these positions known to our graduating students. Internships for continuing students can also make a difference. Finally, to all who encounter talented people seeking a great university experience, refer them to us! We thrive because an exceptional group of students joins us each year, and we encourage prospects to visit us and learn more about what we do and how well we do it.


At all times, but especially in a time like this, we need to balance idealism with pragmatism; optimism with realism. For myself, I pledge to continue to do my best to take actions now that will not compromise our prospects for excellence in the future. This letter summarizes some of our near-term plans; we may have to undertake efforts to introduce greater constraint as this year unfolds.


As uncertain as these days are, I remind everyone of the great year we are having: we welcomed a world-class group of students this fall; a tremendous group of new faculty joined us this year; we rejoice in the successes of our continuing faculty like Mary Jo Bang, Professor of English, who won the 2008 National Book Critics Circle Award in poetry; we launched the Institute for Public Health; we dedicated Harry and Susan Seigle Hall; we opened the Danforth University Center; we hosted the Vice Presidential Debate; faculty, students and staff contributed to establishing that water exists on the surface of Mars; and faculty, students, and research staff in the School of Medicine have reported path-breaking research to understand, through genome sequencing, the origins of cancer. Let us work together to continue to enjoy national and world leadership in education, research, and service as one of America’s finest research university communities.


While we face challenges, I am confident that our financial strength, dedication, and creativity will sustain our great university. Even with these challenges in mind, I encourage you to take the coming holiday break to reflect on our many blessings.


Sincerely yours,


Mark S. Wrighton
Chancellor


The Grade is the St. Louis region’s premier blog on education and child welfare. To read other recent posts, go to www.stltoday.com/thegrade.

13 comments

Comments are closed.

5% reduction! how about 50%! Gimme a break, $510,000? Put me on the fasttrack to becoming a school chancellor now!

— jride101
11:50 am November 19th, 2008

Completely overpaid, though with their endowment being as large as it (was), they likely saw him as worth it.

I used to work there and he is the most socially awkward man. Highly intelligent, but socially inept.

— FormerWU
12:26 pm November 19th, 2008

Wow, Isn’t he considerate. No wonder tution is through the roof. This guy is a joke. How dare he insult us like this. What are we suppose to fell sorry for this guy.

— Rye
12:30 pm November 19th, 2008

“Unfortunately, as we consider the financial environment within which we are working, the traditional financial rewards associated with hard work and achievement will be limited.”

“The Vice Chancellor for Human Resources will be working with all supervisors to encourage that compensation increases, in general, be higher for those who are lower in total compensation.”

I work at WU. I couldn’t believe those sentences above when I read them.
Should compensation increases be higher for those who’s total compensation is lower if those with lower compensation do not work as hard?
Some with higher compensation may be facing layoffs of spouses or other economic hardships.

I do admire the chancellor for taking a pay cut and making the decision to scale back or eliminate capital projects.
So often those at the top see cutting staff, freezing salaries, having layoffs as the best step in cutting costs.

— Stunned
12:36 pm November 19th, 2008

I, too, work at a university. I don’t think his salary is that out of line with CEO’s of major corporations. There was an article just this week in the PD about this.

He is, after all, responsible for running an enormous operation at a world-renowned university which includes not only Wash U, but the School of Medicine, and numerous other community endeavors.

I understand your gripe, to a point, regarding who gets raises, however, I know plenty of hard workers at lower levels who do not justly get rewarded come raise time. Unless you are supervising these lower-paid workers, I don’t think you have the authority to define who is working harder than someone else. Also, what makes you think lower-paid workers may not be facing “spouses getting laid off or other financial hardships?” No one is immune to the issues within our crumbling economy. Not to mention, a 3% raise on $30,000 is a lot less than a 3% raise on $100,000. That probably amounts to $20 a paycheck if you’re lucky. YOU sound a little greedy.

We should all be happy we STILL have jobs.

— hark
1:28 pm November 19th, 2008

As a Wash. U employee,I received this e-mail this morning.As a spouse of a down-sized autoworker, I have more respect than ever before for the chancellor.I couldn’t care less about him being socially awkward if he is a decent human being who can lead the university though these difficult times. If the CEO’s of some of the automakers and financial institutions had had as deep a commitment to doing the right thing to ensure their companies stayed on firm financial footing, I doubt our country would be in the condition it is.Although I didn’t realize he was THAT well-paid, he has a tremendous amount of responsibility, and the quality education offered here isn’t cheap.He seems to have a firm grasp of the situation, and while nobody likes to hear that raises for the immediate future will be very limited, at least he is trying to keep us employed,instead of taking the money with the attitude that we have seen in the news recently in so many of the financial circles.They would rather cut thousands of lower level jobs while giving inept yet greedy CEOS multi- millions in undeserved bonuses.Chancellor Wrighton is leading by example, and I can respect that.I don’t think he is expecting sympathy, he just wants us all to realize the need to tighten our belts across the board.It will take a giant team effort for the university, and the country, to get through this economic crisis.

— going green in caseyville
1:47 pm November 19th, 2008

The first poster is wrong and should have read the article more closely. Wrighton is forgoing 5% in January and another 5% in July for a total reduction of 10%(7.5% cumulative for the year). How many university chancellors, CEOs, politicians, etc have you heard about that have VOLUNTARILY AGREED to give back a portion of their salary? Exactly…

As far lower paid employees not working hard(Stunned), WU employees undergo annual performance evaluations- raises are not handed out “just cuz”(like most union contract positions), they are merit raises. If you don’t work hard, odds are that you will get nothing. Wrighton is ensuring that the pool of money available for raises for lower salary employees maintains its integrity and is not cut back. I would say that is a very admirable position for him to take.

— the_Kemist
1:58 pm November 19th, 2008

I am also a WU employee and I have the utmost respect for the Chancellor after receiving this email from him this morning. It shows he truly cares about the University and it’s success and the success of all those involved with the University…not just himself which is hard to come by these days.

— Proud
2:28 pm November 19th, 2008

Considering that the chancellor didn’t make over $30 million last year as an Auto/Bank CEO and isn’t begging the American people for a multi-billion dollar hand out AND is willing to part with any of his own salary tells you that this man is concerned about his employees. And (if you check out his resume on Washington University’s website) he earned his PhD from MIT, I’m fairly certain he would be making a LOT more in the private sector than his salary at WU.

Name one other CEO or head of a world renowned location that has decreased his salary? I haven’t heard of one.

— JustMe
3:36 pm November 19th, 2008

His being socially awkward has nothing to do with how he performs as the leader of this great university. Under his tenure we’ve seen substantial growth in all schools, expansion (scholarly, fiscal and property-wise)and an increase in the quality of education. I know of at least a dozen of our programs, undergrad and grad (including those on the medical campus) that have reached top ten status. He’s doing his job, and doing it WELL at that. A 10% pay cut? I appreciate that. Granted, it would still make him wealthier than most, but 10% is 10% MORE than what most heads of schools/businesses would take. Moreover, my father is a higher education administrator…PLEASE don’t underestimate how hard these men and women work! 60-70 hour weeks are VERY common, and he’s (Wrighton) worked very hard to get to that point!!

— Medical student
7:11 am November 20th, 2008

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All