Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
02.05.2009 11:32 am

Update: Earp found guilty of stealing from community college campaign fund

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

UPDATE: Steven Wyatt Earp, a political consultant who worked on St. Louis Community College’s referendum campaign, was found guilty this afternoon on two felony counts of stealing more than $25,000.

The jury found him not guilty on a 3rd count and was hung on a 4th count.

The jury will hear more evidence Friday morning and then recommend a sentence. Earp faces up to 15 years in prison for each of the first two counts.

“This has been a long time in coming,” said Robert Nelson, chairman of the college’s Board of Trustees. “But justice has prevailed.”

Nelson said that the misuse of campaign funds had a “major impact” on the fact that the referendum failed. And now, the college is assessing a number of budgetary concerns, he said.

He said the college has no immediate plans for another referendum.

OUR PREVIOUS STORY:The case against political consultant Steven Wyatt Earp is wrapping up. As you might remember, Earp is accused of stealing more than $220,000 from a St. Louis Community College campaign fund.
He is alleged to have then used the money to buy a BMW, a Lexus, and an engagement ring that cost more than $10,000. The St. Louis circuit attorney’s office charged him back in July 2007 with two felony counts of stealing more than $25,000 and two felony counts of stealing more than $500.

The trial began on Monday. And Post-Dispatch courts reporter Heather Ratcliffe tells me that closing arguments are about to begin. So stay tuned to see how this saga ends.

For a little more background, I am pasting below the story I wrote when the charges came out. This story ran on July 25, 2007:

A political consultant was arrested Tuesday morning on accusations he stole more than $220,000 from a St. Louis Community College campaign fund last year and used the money to buy a BMW, a Lexus and an engagement ring that topped $10,000.

Steven Wyatt Earp, 31, of Fenton, was charged late Monday by the St. Louis circuit attorney’s office with two felony counts of stealing more than $25,000 and two felony counts of stealing more than $500.

“He used (the stolen money) to finance a high quality of life, is what the evidence indicates,” said assistant circuit attorney Scott Ingram.

Earp posted bond, which was set at $100,000, and was expected to be released Tuesday afternoon.

Clinton Wright, Earp’s attorney, said Earp is innocent and will fight the charges.

“It seems fitting that this has exploded during the release of the latest Harry Potter book,” Wright said. “Because it seems like a witch hunt.”

Wright pointed fingers at the college’s campaign committee but declined to elaborate. The committee, which was made up of college employees and supporters, has been asking authorities to investigate the possible misuse of funds.

The campaign committee raised about $600,000 from donors to pass a property tax increase in April 2006. The referendum failed, and soon after the election, college officials and the campaign committee noticed questionable payments and began looking into how money was spent during the campaign.

In recent months, the FBI and St. Louis police have been investigating. Members of the campaign committee who were interviewed said investigators asked about Earp and Michael Rohrbacker, a college board member who wrote the checks during the campaign. Rohrbacker and Earp are friends.

Earp, who says he is a descendant of the famous frontier marshal, was paid by the committee $507,436 to oversee mailings, canvassing and campaigning. According to the criminal complaint, he falsely charged the committee on four separate occasions in March of last year.

In one instance, he charged the committee for $218,715 for postage of five mailings, but bank accounts and other records show he only paid $116,200 for postage, the complaint said.

The complaint, citing bank records and other sources, said Earp also charged the committee:

- $130,720 for printing when he only paid $44,230.

- $40,000 to pay canvassers when he only paid them $20,620.

- $60,000 to pay $20,000 each to three canvassing supervisors. Earp paid two of the supervisors - his brother, John Earp, and his current wife, Tiffany - that amount. But the third supervisor, Ramona Marshall, received only $2,000, so Earp overbilled for $18,000, the complaint said.

Earp’s contract said he would be paid a fee of $30,000 plus reimbursement of expenses, the charges say.

“It’s very clear from the people that we’ve talked to that Mr. Earp was paid a flat fee for his services, so he wasn’t supposed to get any sort of mark-up for his printing or mailing,” Ingram said.

Days after the April 2006 election, Earp and his soon-to-be wife bought two new cars that cost nearly $20,000 with a down payment and taxes, the complaint said, citing bank records. He also spent more than $10,000 for an engagement ring.

Earp told the Post-Dispatch in January that he had made a good living on recent political campaigns and that he bought the cars used, making payments on them like most other Americans. He also said he got married in Jamaica last summer. He said that he made a good profit from the campaign but said he earned it.

According to charges, Earp also deposited $90,000 into an account for Decrevi Inc., a company he owned and which was used to receive money from other clients and to pay other consultants. Earp and his wife regularly took money out of the account as a “salary.” He also withdrew several thousand dollars in cash for unknown purposes, the charges say.

The campaign committee has also questioned Rohrbacker’s handling of money. It claimed in January that he spent $13,000 in the campaign account without its knowledge. The committee also claims he improperly forgave $60,000 in debt in a campaign finance report and improperly dissolved the committee.

“We investigated the full campaign,” Ingram said. “We’ve charged the people who we feel there is compelling evidence to charge at this point.”

Richard Wilkes, spokesman for the St. Louis police, said Tuesday that the police investigation into the campaign is ongoing.

“It is not done,” he said.

Joel Schwartz, Rohrbacker’s attorney, declined to comment Tuesday.

Bob Nelson, president of the college’s board, said the “matter lies with the circuit attorney’s office, and we’ll have to wait and see what happens.”

St. Louis Community College Chancellor Henry Shannon could not be reached for comment.

The Grade is the St. Louis region’s premier blog on education and child welfare. To read other recent posts, go to www.stltoday.com/thegrade.

5 comments

Comments are closed.

The referendum got trounced in the polls if I remember correctly. Somehow blaming this guy for that is a litte far fetched. The District found their scapegoat I guess.

— Not buying it
10:26 am February 6th, 2009

Isn’t it true that the engagement ring and one of the cars bought with stolen money by Earp went to his wife, then Tiffany Boyer, now Tiffany Boyer-Earp, who was recently paid handsomely, as the only employee of a political mgmt. firm called Phase 3, by Democratic County Councilman Steve Stenger, who then hired the convicted felon’s wife to be his Chief of Staff??? Oh my what a tangled web we weave!!!

— Red Leader
3:26 pm February 6th, 2009

This travesty of justice will indeed be overturned on appeal.

And it is only too obvious that the other people talking nonsense in their posts here (Nip Tuck, Phoebe, Red Leader) are breathtakingly ill-informed as to the facts of what actually DID and did NOT happen here. They are also obviously people who do not know the first thing about the Earps and Mike Rohrbacker and all the details of PROP EJ and why this malicious prosecution took place.

Always interesting when some ignorant folks hide behind the anonymity of the internet to post character assassinations designed to ruin some folks’ reputations, and yet who have no real knowledge of the events beyond what was reported in the media. LOL!!!!

— murphstl
11:58 am February 7th, 2009

Very interesting that the folks who posted the ill-informed nonsense about the Earps and Mike Rohrbacker don’t feel able or comfortable to defense their rediculously outrageous character assassination when called out on it.

— murphstl
9:06 pm February 7th, 2009

In not taking any side on the merits of the case itself, I will say that overturning this, or any, conviction on appeal is a Hail Mary pass. The Court of Appeals could only overturn the conviction if it is against the weight of the evidence, constitutes an erroneous application of the law or the trial judge somehow abused his/her discretion. This is NEVER an easy standard–and reversals on appeal are very rare. Further, getting an appeal heard and decided could easily take 6-months to a year. The reality (no matter what you think about the merits of the case) is that Earp is going to do some time.

— Ronald Bowers
1:24 am February 14th, 2009