Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
04.30.2008 11:56 am

Al From’s truckin’ gal

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

dlc_opt.jpgAl From, founder and chief executive officer of the Democratic Leadership Council, dropped by the office Tuesday and predicted that “despite what people said a year ago, the election this November will be a battle for the political center.”

Of course, that’s what the DLC is all about — convincing Democrats to move toward what Mr. From calls the “progessive center,” where From believes that elections are won or lost. The politician most closely associated with the DLC and its “third way” approach is former President Bill Clinton. The policy initiative most closely associated with DLC politics was welfare reform, signed by Mr. Clinton in 1996. Many liberal Democrats hated its work requirements, but is has seemed to work. As important to Democrats, it gave Mr. Clinton credibility among independents and centrist voters in his 1996 re-election race against Sen. Bob Dole of Kansas.

Mr. From and the DLC officially are neutral in this year’s Democratic primary battle, but he acknowledges that Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton is a longtime DLC supporter and a personal friend. But he adds that Sen. Barack Obama’s “post partisan” campaign owes a lot to DLC ideas.

“This is a year of rare opportunity for Democrats,” Mr. From said. “We have a chance to build a lasting, enduring majority around the progressive center.”

He identified these key challenges for Democrats this fall: Convincing voters they are serious about keeping the country safe; convincing voters that Democrats can restore an “upward mobility track” in a global economy; soothing middle class anxiety on health care, retirement and college costs.

“Nobody who works in this country ought to be poor,” Mr. From said, repeating the DLC’s mantra. “We have to focus like a laser beam on the forgotten middle class and get away from the brain-dead politics of the left and right.”

Sen. Clinton is following that playbook this week as she campaigns in Indiana ahead of its primary next Tuesday. Today she “commuted” to work in the front seat of a Ford F-250 pickup driven by an Indiana sheet metal worker and stopped at a gas station for smile for cameras and pay for 63 bucks worth of gasoline. Mrs. Clinton, like Republican Sen. John McCain, is proposing a summer-long “holiday” from the 18.4 cents a gallon federal gasoline tax. She’s also promising factory workers in Indiana that her administration will find a way to keep manufacturing jobs from moving overseas.

These are popular appeals to the middle class; whether they are intellectually honest or good public policy is another question. The gasoline tax holiday would cost the federal highway trust fund somewhere between $8 billion and $10 billion, while saving motorists about $4 bucks a fill-up. Nor is it possible to turn back the tide of globalization by making promises that will be impossible to keep.

Sen. Obama — the elitist — is telling people hard truths. There’s no such thing as cheap gas for gas hogs like F-250 pickups (curb weight: 5,800 pounds) and manufacturing jobs will continue to disappear. There’s only the hope of a better job through hard work and education. Mrs. Clinton knows that, but she’s willing to pretend otherwise. If the “third way” is pandering, there’s little hope for real change.

4 comments

Comments are closed.

Kevin,

Why are DNC officials dropping by the PD offices? Do the Republicans ever pay you a call? Perhaps they could share their nefarious plans with you as the Democrats do. Bush has moved the center so far to the right that I don’t recognize it anymore. When things like torture, wiretapping, and massive tax cuts amid massive war spending are considered acceptable, people like Joe Lieberman and John McCain look like progressives. The election of 2006 looked to me a like the start of the shifting of the political middle. I will be interested to see if 2008 continues the shift.

— PurpleDude
12:50 pm April 30th, 2008

The election is still for the democrats to lose. Forty percent of the electorate will vote democratic under any circumstance. Somewhere between 30-35% will vote republican. Thusly the race is on for the other 25 to 30 percent. Same as in the past.
Under a capitalistic system we have winners and losers sometimes aided by political reasons but to say everyone is guaranteed a livible wage is laughable when considering a good percentage of young people are dropping out of school with no marketable job skills.
Yes Mrs Clinton may be pandering to a certain segment of the population but doesn’t all politicians.
The facts remain that in a national election the candidates need to be “liked” by the majority of the independent electorate. In 2000 IF Gore had carried his own home state he would have been elected president. Kerry beat himself in ‘04 by running an inept campaign.

— jerele
2:32 pm April 30th, 2008

Don’t mean to offend anyone, but where, when and how did the Democratic party ever establish that they were the “progressive” ones? What I see are proud card-carrying union members (God bless them all), but even the teachers and journeymen tradesmen are usually followers, not leaders. Few of them (at least in American unions) ever make a suggestion to improve productivity, since they expect that would end up cutting one of “their own” out of a job, or at least get them in trouble with the shop steward.

The poor and uneducated aren’t much different. When they “lead” at all, it’s often in a negative manner, with complaints, sit-down strikes, picketing, about anything an activist lawyer can think up to feather his own nest, and occasionally violence.

Don’t get me wrong. One of the most willing workers I ever hired was a young guy with almost no education. He begged for any job at $5 an hour, and was thrilled when I told him he’d have to take $8.75. He sold the TV out of his trailer to buy a pair of required steel-toe shoes. Everyone in that medium-sized shop full of journeyman machinists and welders liked the guy, and wanted him to get ahead, so we tried him on a pneumatic grinder, with a pay hike. He drove everybody bonkers; wouldn’t ever turn that noisy grinder off and take a breather. I doubt if he’ll ever make big bucks, but I’ll bet he’s working, and I’m proud of him..

— Bob H
3:25 pm April 30th, 2008

The will to work will always be a “marketable skill.”

— 1*
4:36 pm April 30th, 2008