Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
06.23.2008 11:25 am

President Bush not alone in low approval ratings

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

Just about everyone is aware that President Bush’s approval rating has been hovering right around 30 percent for some time now. This is nothing new for most reasonably informed observers — Bush’s approval rating is cited in just about every single news story about the presidential race between Barack Obama and John McCain.

Bush’s unpopularity is hardly a matter of debate — but his abysmal polling numbers should perhaps be taken in context of a broader American dissatisfaction with the way things are going in America. As has been widely reported, pollsters have found that nearly 80 percent of Americans think the country is on the “wrong track.”

In fact, though Bush’s approval rating is low by historical standards, it has been outperforming the approval rating of that other elected branch of government — the Democratic-controlled U.S. Congress — whose approval rating was just 19 percent in the latest poll.

This week, 52 percent of Americans rated Congress’ performance as “poor,” the highest-ever disapproval rating for the legislature. Just 11 percent rank its performance as “good” or “excellent.”

Furthermore, Gallup’s annual report on Americans’ confidence in government institutions found Congress ranking dead last – just 12 percent, behind “Big business” and “HMOs” – the worst-ever confidence rating for any institution in the 35-year history of Gallup’s questionnaire.

Seizing on this general American dissatisfaction, both Barack Obama and John McCain have successfully used the theme of “change” as the centerpiece of their campaigns — McCain has been fond of saying that this election is about “what type of change” voters really want.

Moral of the story? Low approval ratings do not necessarily mean electoral defeat for the party that has them. As two prominent political scientists noted in a recent report:

Approval ratings and the economy are likely to provide weaker clues to an election’s outcome when the incumbent is not running.

News reports that ominously cite Bush’s low approval ratings as “bad news” for McCain forget to mention that Congress’s even lower approval ratings are by no means spelling doom for the Democratic majority in Congress. In fact, a recent poll showed the Democrats maintaining a solid lead over Republicans on the generic Congressional ballot.

Barack Obama may very well win in November. But if he does, it will be because he ran a better campaign than John McCain — not because of President Bush’s approval rating.

*UPDATE: Perhaps 80 percent of Americans feel that their country is on the “wrong track” because of “news” stories like this one from the AP:

Everything seemingly is spinning out of control
By ALAN FRAM and EILEEN PUTMAN

WASHINGTON (AP) — Is everything spinning out of control?

Midwestern levees are bursting. Polar bears are adrift. Gas prices are skyrocketing. Home values are abysmal. Air fares, college tuition and health care border on unaffordable. Wars without end rage in Iraq, Afghanistan and against terrorism…The can-do, bootstrap approach embedded in the American psyche is under assault. Eroding it is a dour powerlessness that is chipping away at the country’s sturdy conviction that destiny can be commanded with sheer courage and perseverance.

It goes on like that for about three more pages. As USA Today’s James Pethokoukis writes: “The ‘article’ makes me weep for my chosen profession.” That’s putting it lightly.

9 comments

Comments are closed.

I’m pleased to see you actually said “Democrat controlled US Congress” Others would have just said “Congress”

Kinda goes along w/ this story about Americans knowing who’s actually in Congress.

http://rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/71_know_pelosi_is_a_democrat_but_most_don_t_know_other_congressional_leaders

— AJ
11:43 am June 23rd, 2008

A very politically slanted article, but that’s what we expect from the P-D.

— Senior citizen
2:01 pm June 23rd, 2008

Funny how neither you, Mr. Mayer, nor anyone at the PD covered the fact that Congress caved to Bush on the FISA/Tel co. bill that just passed and that SEn. Bond was instumental in its Senate passage. I just wish St.Louis could get a real newspaper in my lifetime.

— A CENTRIST
3:01 pm June 23rd, 2008

The idea that “if Obama wins, it will be because he ran a better campaign” underlies the unfortunate tendency of the media to focus on the horse race rather than the actual issues. If Obama wins this year, it will probably have much more to do with the fact that Americans are sick of being lied to on a daily basis by the administration, overwhelmingly dislike the War in Iraq, and are tired of the Republican party placing the interests of the wealthy ahead of everyone else’s. Although the media would love it if “the campaign” was the most important thing (since that would mean their coverage was that much more important), the reality is that people vote on their values and these values have been shifting to the left over the past few years.

— Adam S
3:06 pm June 23rd, 2008

Geez, neocon warbats, when the GOP ran the country and Congress into the ground in its running up the deficits to all-time record, never to be our own country again levels, I didn’t hear you complaining. Also, when it takes 60 votes in the US Senate to pass any legislation and the GOP says “NO” to everything decent, kind and supportive of community in our country, it’s no wonder Congress is held in low esteem.

Vote Democratic!

The country you save will be your own!

— Tim Hogan
4:37 pm June 23rd, 2008

Tim Hogan is an idiot.

— Nick Kasoff
9:05 pm June 23rd, 2008

Nick, you’re better than that. Why stoop?

— Mr. Brain
10:36 pm June 23rd, 2008

The sad thing is that saying, “_____ is an idiot” was actually a successful strategy for the right-wingers over the past 8 years. Fortunately, after voters get hit over the head with a stick enough times they start to recognize just how empty reactionary arguments like Mr. Kasoff’s really are.

— Adam S
11:15 am June 24th, 2008

Maybe if liberals did not come up with such stupid ideas more legislation would pass. After all, isnt about 65% of our federal budget for the past 50 years nothing but stupid liberal ideas put into practice paid for by taxpayers.

It never crosses a liberals mind that they are part of the problem not the solution to the problem.

— havetolaugh
11:25 am June 25th, 2008