Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
08.07.2008 11:52 am

Clinton: Letting my delegates vote for me will help party unity

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

[This is a bit of a follow-up to a previous post about disgruntled Hillary Clinton supporters and Democratic unity behind Obama.]

At a fundraiser, Hillary Clinton answered a question about allowing her delegates to vote for her at the Democratic Convention (echoing the goal of The Denver Group, the grassroots pro-Hillary organization responsible for the video in my previous post) by saying she believed that entering her name for consideration and allowing delegates to vote their conscience — instead of holding a simple roll-call voice vote — would actually help party unity.

“”I happen to believe that we will come out stronger if people feel that their voices were heard and their views were respected,” … “I think that is a very big part of how we actually come out unified.

“I know from just what I’m hearing that there’s incredible pent-up desire, and I think that, you know, people want to feel like, ‘OK, it’s a catharsis, we’re here, we did it, and then everybody get behind Sen. Obama.”’ Clinton told the California crowd. “That is what most people believe is the best way to go.”

In the video, Sen. Clinton also goes on to emphatically refute one supporter’s hopeful “what if” question of a possible surprise nomination for Clinton if some delegates change their minds, laughing and saying “That’s not going to happen.”

However, ABC News is reporting that Sen. Clinton’s people are still locked in a heated battle with the DNC and Obama’s campaign over Clinton’s visibility at the convention. Another ABC story notes that Clinton’s refusal to rule out letting her delegates vote may be a potential “bargaining chip” that she is holding over party officials to get a more prominent role.

David Axelrod, Obama’s chief campaign strategist, insists that “we’re gonna work this out.”

**UPDATE: Time’s Karen Tumulty also examines lingering resentment from the Clintons and Hillary supporters:

“For so many of my supporters, just like so many of Barack’s supporters, this was a first-time investment of heart and soul and money and effort and sleepless nights and miles of travel,” Clinton said. “You just don’t turn it off like that.”

Those comments — now playing in clips on YouTube—speak to not only the bruised feelings of Clinton’s many supporters. Embedded in those remarks, say friends and advisers, are hints of Clinton’s own feelings in the aftermath of a race in which she fought so hard and still fell short….

…But behind the united front, says an adviser, “it’s not a great relationship, and it’s probably not going to become one.” In private conversations, associates say, Clinton remains skeptical that Obama can win in the fall. That’s a sentiment some other Democrats believe is not just a prediction but a wish, because it would prove her right about his weaknesses as a general-election candidate and possibly pave the way for her to run again in 2012.

**UPDATE 2: And speaking of controversy over a former candidate’s role at the convention…Hillary isn’t alone: “Tabloid’s claims threaten Edwards’ role at party’s convention.”

9 comments

Comments are closed.

It’s gonna be a freak show in Denver. I can’t wait!

— Go_Fish
12:47 pm August 7th, 2008

I certainly hope that there are enough men involved in this crazyness, so that women will not seem like the exception when they are measured and balanced, professional and capable.

It is truth of the word in action, just look at the leader to understand those under him/her. When there is sickness at the top, it filters down to everthing part of them and everything that they are head of and oversee.

Extreme sickness we are witnessing. Why would anyone in their right mind take losing so personal?

— D. Walker
12:53 pm August 7th, 2008

Hillary only suspended her campaign. Anyone else out there think she is going to take this away from Obama? She ain’t waiting 8 years. She’ll be as old as McCain my then. Lesson: Never mess with the Clintons.
Barack - watch your back when the Clintons are behind you.

— A CENTRIST
1:16 pm August 7th, 2008

” Why would anyone in their right mind take losing so personal?

How should The Chosen One respond to LOSING the popular vote in the democrat primaries and still getting the nomination via a caucus system that is highly flawed? In big states that dems have to carry, The Chosen One LOST.

— Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum
2:10 pm August 7th, 2008

GF -
The real freak show will be in Minnesota when Senator Larry Craig and Mitt Romney are found in the bathroom together.

— RHarnack
2:24 pm August 7th, 2008

“How should The Chosen One respond to LOSING the popular vote in the democrat primaries… ” blah, blah, blah.

You either don’t know or choose to ignore how the democrat nominating process works. There is no such thing as the “popular vote”. Every state has a different nominating process.

— Ricardo
2:25 pm August 7th, 2008

Dancing.

— RHarnack
2:27 pm August 7th, 2008

Si,

Just like that one who loves CONFUSION and things stirred up! Aren’t you Si.

— D. Walker
3:20 pm August 7th, 2008

Anyone who did not think that Hillary was not planning some kind of “end run” must be living in a dream world. This is so classic Clintons

— tmct
8:44 am August 8th, 2008