Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
08.25.2008 9:01 pm

Tuesday editorial: Unity…sort of

  • Email this
  • Print this

demos_opt.jpgOf all the 23 gazillion words written, uttered, blogged, Twittered, texted, broadcast, cablecast, uploaded or downloaded during the first day of the Democratic National Convention, here are some of the more prescient:

• Humorist Dave Barry, writing for The National Journal Online: “Sen. [Hillary] Clinton is scheduled to address the convention Tuesday night, when she will either call her supporters to unite behind [Barack] Obama, or attempt to snatch the nomination and escape with it by helicopter to a secret mountain fortress.”

An unnamed “senior Obama supporter” tells Politico.com that aides to Mrs. Clinton negotiating over her role at the convention act “like Japanese soldiers in the South Pacific still fighting after the war is over.”

Even as the
Democrats in Denver try to bring unity to their fractious party (the convention’s slogan, according to Mr. Barry, is, “A Unified Party, United in Unity, Together as One, Undivided”), the party’s genetic coding for self-destruction was taking over.

On Sunday, the Gallup Organization released a poll saying that fewer than half of those who supported Sen. Clinton of New York during the primaries said they definitely will vote for Sen. Obama of Illinois in November. Forty-seven percent of Mrs. Clinton’s supporters said they are solidly behind Mr. Obama; another 23 percent said their support is soft. Thirty percent said they’d vote for Republican Sen. John McCain of Arizona or sit out the election altogether.

The Republican Party’s impressive response team was ready with a campaign spot featuring a Clinton supporter who now supports Mr. McCain, as well as a second spot questioning why Mr. Obama chose Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware over Mrs. Clinton as his running mate.

All of which suggests that when she speaks tonight in prime time, Mrs. Clinton will have the important role in the convention that she demanded, although not the precise one she wanted. She will have to be an agent of unity. Given her Bataan Death March primary campaign, it’s not a role that fits her very well. She’ll have to be a lot more persuasive — and, we dare say, sincere — than she has been to date.

Most voters
alive today can’t remember when the nominating conventions last included any meaningful suspense, when ballot followed ballot and floor whips twisted arms and made outrageous promises in return for votes. Today’s conventions (of both parties) belong to marketers and message experts, to say nothing of the corporate lobbyists who tiptoe through new ethics rules (bagels for breakfast, OK; eggs for breakfast, not OK; quesadillas con queso, OK; quesadillas con carne, not OK) in wining and dining the powerful and the would-be powerful.

Political junkies have the opportunity to overdose on this all day long (Wow! Claire McCaskill!) on cable networks and websites. But the true public work of the convention is reserved for the prime-time hour between 9 and 10 p.m. each night (Central time) when the broadcast networks beam convention events to a mass audience. Michelle Obama, the candidate’s wife, got last night’s key slot.

Tuesday night went to Mrs. Clinton; her husband, the former president, is scheduled for a non-prime-time slot on Wednesday, playing second fiddle to Mr. Biden, presented to the world early Saturday morning as Mr. Obama’s choice as running mate.

It was a solid choice. Those who know Mr. Biden only for his self-indulgent rhetorical excesses are missing one of the brightest minds in the U.S. Senate. He is a formidable campaigner; quick on his feet and deft with the needle. His foreign policy experience fills a gaping hole in Mr. Obama’s bona fides. At least 90 percent of a president’s job lies in picking smart, independent people to carry out his policies. If a President Obama’s appointments are as good as Candidate Obama’s first appointment, the nation would be well served.

But first there is a campaign to be waged and an election to be won. What Mrs. Clinton says tonight — and how she says it — could have a great deal of bearing on that.

9 comments

Comments are closed.

People who voted for Clinton because of their values or policy preferences will vote for Obama, as his policy and values are nearly identical to Clinton, whereas McCain differs with them both on just about everything.

Obama might lose some of the people who voted for Clinton solely because of personality issues. But then, those are the very people who would have been susceptible to Republican smear campaigns anyway. Does the Gallup poll even say that the Clinton supporters are all registered Democrats?

BTW, from the same pole, it looks like Obama’s lead has grown over the last month…

“Obama holds a 47%-43% edge over McCain among registered voters and a 48%-45% edge among likely voters…

In the USA TODAY/Gallup Poll a month ago, Obama led McCain by 3 percentage points, but McCain held a 4-point lead among likely voters.”

— Adam
10:54 pm August 25th, 2008

Phew!

— Shirley Dillon
8:24 am August 26th, 2008

First,ADam “pole” is what women dance around - “poll” is what Gallup takes - what does that tell me about you?

Second, what a typical disengenious uninformative editorial. Why not tell us:
1. That Biden provides “gravitas” to the ticket
2. Biden was wrong on Iraq - wanted to divide into three:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6166796
3. That Biden’s son, Hunter, is a lobbiest who has made millions from working for MBIA - hence Paul Krugman’s reference to Biden’s bankrupcy vote.
4. Biden has been in the senate longer than John McCain.

Some change Democrats!

— A CENTRIST
10:31 am August 26th, 2008

OMG - I almost forgot my favorite thing about Biden:

He was the head of the Senate Judiciary Committee that borked Bork on his Supreme Court nomination.
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B0DE0DA1331F93AA35754C0A961948260

— A CENTRIST
10:33 am August 26th, 2008

Centrist:

Who said Biden wasn’t chose to add experience to the Democratic ticket. Most vp candidates do supplement for things the P doesn’t have. Let’s not pretend you guys gushed when Bush did it with Cheney.

— Matt W.
12:53 pm August 26th, 2008

CENTRIST:

Biden didn’t want to divide Iraq n 3, he wanted a federal system with power divided between 3 parts and a central govt. I know Republicans hate federalism and have attacked it the past 8 years.

— Matt W.
1:00 pm August 26th, 2008

Here ya go: I finally got a link on the Hunter Biden story. Yeah, the Democrats are a party of change!
http://www.gopusa.com/news/2008/august/0826_biden_son1.shtml

— A CENTRIST
3:43 pm August 26th, 2008

GOP USA.com? Now that’s a trusty news service. It also tells us just how “centrist” you really are!

— Adam
6:52 pm August 26th, 2008

Adam, why do you complain about every source? Can you prove it’s not true? Back up your attack like a man. Let’s see, I guess I should trust The New York Times or the Post-Dispatch? What would you prefer? Unfortunately, like NBC - no Barack criticism, they don’t report anything.
That leaves people looking for the truth and the news to use alternative sources. Will they be reporting the McCain Biden bump?
http://www.gallup.com/poll/109834/Gallup-Daily-Bounce-Obama-Post-Biden-Tracking.aspx
I doubt it.

— A CENTRIST
9:05 pm August 26th, 2008