Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
09.25.2008 9:01 pm

Friday editorial: Bizarro-world

  • Email this
  • Print this

bizarro_opt.jpgLately we have had an opportunity to reread, sometimes as many as five and even six times an evening, Margaret Wise Brown and Garth Williams’ classic 1952 children’s book, “Mr. Dog.”

The plot, such as it is, concerns a pipe-smoking dog named (because he belongs to himself) Crispin’s Crispian. He runs into a boy who also belongs to himself, and boy and dog live together happily ever after. At one point, Ms. Brown’s text explains:

“Crispin’s Crispian was a conservative. He liked everything at the right time. Dinner at dinnertime, lunch at lunchtime, breakfast in time for breakfast, and sunrise at sunrise and sunset at sunset.”

As an explanation of “conservative,” this leaves a lot to be desired, but maybe it’s enough for small children. More accurate would be Barry Goldwater’s definition, given in his book “The Conscience of a Conservative”:

“I have little interest in streamlining government or in making it more efficient, for I mean to reduce its size. I do not undertake to promote welfare, for I propose to extend freedom. My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them. It is not to inaugurate new programs, but to cancel old ones that do violence to the Constitution, or that have failed in their purpose, or that impose on the people an unwarranted financial burden.”

Watching Wall Street
tycoons beg for government money and watching a Republican administration bend over backward to try to give it to them has been disconcerting. It’s the sort of thing we expect from Democrats. As Rep. Kenny Hulshof of Columbia, the Republican candidate for Missouri governor, told us the other day, it’s “Bizarro-world.”

The very nature of “conservative” has been shape-shifting all year. In January, as New Hampshire’s Republican primary approached, Sen. John McCain of Arizona, who had a 100 percent positive rating from the conservative Club for Growth in 2007, was deemed not conservative enough.

The Club for Growth is for economic conservatives, and Mr. McCain’s campaign nearly foundered over his suspect voting record on immigration, stem cell research, campaign finance reform and other social issues.
Mike Huckabee, the former governor of Arkansas, was the last GOP primary hope for social conservatives, but Club for Growth types viewed him as suspiciously populist. Although Mr. McCain won the nomination, he didn’t win the support of social conservatives until he named Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate.

Having run toward social conservatives, Mr. McCain now is forced by the Wall Street crisis to run away from his 26-year congressional record as an economic conservative. It must be terribly wrenching to wake up every morning and have to decide which hat to wear.

You find
few conservatives today with the philosophical purity of Barry Goldwater or William F. Buckley, whose views on individual liberty gave them an almost libertarian stance on some social issues. The crisis on Wall Street is a real gut check for those who might be called “cafeteria conservatives” — some of this, a little of that, none of the rest.

Cafeteria conservatism was the mark of the Bush administration: a muscular foreign policy, to be sure, along with lower taxes, less regulation and judicial appointees who considered the Constitution as written in 1787 as perfectly adequate in all respects to the problems of the 21st century. But there also were deep government incursions into private behavior and civil liberties, huge deficits and expanded entitlement programs, all anathema to traditional conservatives.

Government intervention was not ended, but rather re-directed to private ends: to enrich lumber interests and utility companies, oil companies and military contractors. The interests of the few were placed above those of the many.

History teaches us that government, whatever form it takes and whatever philosophy it espouses, invariably overreaches, usually because of an excess of greed. That’s why there are revolutions, and why we have elections: to restore order, at least for a while, and perhaps even some predictability.

Dinner at dinnertime, lunch at lunchtime, breakfast in time for breakfast, and sunrise at sunrise and sunset at sunset.

8 comments

Comments are closed.

Congratulations to the PD editorial board. Josef Goebbels would be proud of you. You put in just enough truth to make it a good propaganda. Not good propaganda, but adequate.

While you were reading dog stories, I was reading about Hussein errr Robin Hood who store from the rich to give to the poor. Why did he steal from the rich? The answer is …..”the poor didn’t have any money.

Then I read the communist Manifesto…Hussen must have read it, too. He is operating right out of it. While, McCain may be getting up mornings worrying about his past record, as you alleged. Hussin, obviously has the communist manifesto with a paper clip on the page where he is reading. When he gets up in the morning he reads and new page and has his aides explain it to him. He is making remarkable progress!!!

— johnh
5:43 am September 26th, 2008

> Watching Wall Street tycoons beg for government money and watching
> a Republican administration bend over backward to try to give it
> to them has been disconcerting. It’s the sort of thing we expect
> from Democrats.

Huh? Given the Post-Dispatch’s love for all things Democratic, it seems to me that a circumstance which caused Republicans to behave in a manner which you would “expect from Democrats” would be encouraging, not disconcerting.

— Nick Kasoff
8:11 am September 26th, 2008

The details of the plan are starting to leak out. Clearly, this thing stinks. Assuming there are “profits” Here is what happens:

USE OF DEPOSITS.Of the amount referred to in paragraph (1)
65 percent shall be deposited into the Housing Trust Fund established under section 1338 of the Federal Housing Enterprises Regulatory Reform Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 4568); and
35 percent shall be deposited into the Capital Magnet Fund established under section 1339 of that Act (12 U.S.C. 4569).

This apparently means left wing fringe groups like Acorn will end up with the money. This is the same ACORN that has allegedly been involevd in voter fraud in cities all over America. How many more surprises like this are in the bill? This needs to be a workout, not a bailout.

This confluence of corruption at Fannie and Freddie, the push to liberalize lending terms for social goals, the creation of irresponsible financial products to take advantage of the situation and overreaching accounting standards (mark to market and other unnecessary Sarbannes Oxley requirements which created losses that don’t exist except on paper) have combined to push us to the brink. To make it the perfect storm, it is happening a month before an election. Our politicians can’t help themselves. Their greed for power may be the only greed that surpasses the greed for wealth. Let’s hope somebody can rise above politcs and pull our bacon out of the fire. I’m not holding my breath. All 535 need to go and we need to start over.

By the way, it is clear to me that if you guys are rereading that book, you may need some new reading material. To that end, I am sending down a few books for your reading pleasure.

— JJk
8:34 am September 26th, 2008

The Republican Party has lost its identity. Shortly after the “Contract with America” era the Rockefeller/Bush neocons seized control from the Reagan/Goldwater Republicans. “Read my lips” Bush, his son, and their cronies have no guiding fiscal principles that are at all related to reducing the crushing burden of government on our society. They give special interests priority over taxpayers’ or citizens’ interests.

Sadly the electable choices are Republican bigger government or Democrat infinite government. Many who are tired of the lesser evil option will vote Libertarian. That will probably give the Marxists their long awaited chance at control. We may soon know if we can do it any better than the Soviets.

— A#
10:27 am September 26th, 2008

-JJk

“This apparently means left wing fringe groups like Acorn will end up with the money. ”

What are you smoking?

Despite your feelings, there are a lot of smart people in DC.
They know we citizens want our $$$$ protected and they are crafting this bailout to protect and ensure the bad guys don’t get out free.

If they thought you were needed in DC to help, chances are they would have called.

— STL
1:09 pm September 26th, 2008

“…. Despite your feelings, there are a lot of smart people in DC.
They know we citizens want our $$$$ protected and they are crafting this bailout to protect and ensure the bad guys don’t get out free…..” - STL

Surely that statement was meant as satire, STL. Then again…..

Would these be the same “smart” people that have crafted our great welfare, education, energy, transportation, immigration, and drug fighting programs for the last eight decades? Are they the smart people that take 48% of the nation’s productivity at all levels in taxes and fees, yet still have to mortgage our grandchildren’s futures to the Chinese and Saudis to cover their unconstitutional social spending and foreign involvements?

Well, you do have a point. They’re living large on our dime, so how smart are we?

— A#
1:43 pm September 26th, 2008

A# mabe you haven’t noticed. The two largest deficit Presidents in the past fifty years have been Reagan “The Great Communicator” and Bush “I cannot tell a lie or at least admit to it or having ever made any mistakes”.
The two greatest financial/economic problems (S&L Bailoiut for $250,000,000,000 and the constant stream of bankruptcies and now the $1,000,000,000,000 in bailouts for the various fanancial organizations)have occurred under, surprise surprise, Reagan (smaller government is better and less regulation is even better) and Bush (I didn’t do anything and no regulation or oversight is even better).
Perhaps you’d rather pay for Bush’s $7,000,000,000,000 deficit and growing or mabe you liked taking care of Reagans $250,000,000,000 mishap with the S&Ls but I’d rather have to live with Charlie Rangle’s $10,000 “problem”.
Democrats aren’t perfect but they know how to count and make smaller mistakes. At least nobody was killed when Bill did his thing.

— DC
5:23 pm September 26th, 2008

Dems Bailout Proposal Redirects ‘Paulson’s Profits’ To Left-Wing Groups… Will Media Notice?
By Warner Todd Huston | September 26, 2008 - 07:46
Bush told the country that we are in an economic crisis and his Treasury Secretary, Henry Paulson, came up with an idea that would, it is claimed, end up actually making money for the U.S. Treasury in the long run. That’s all well and good, but the Democrats already have a plan to siphon off any repayment of the people’s money back to the treasury by adding one little line to the agreement that would end up stealing money from any repayments and giving it to left-wing political advocacy groups like ACORN, the National Urban League and the Hispanic group La Raza. Instead of trying to help the economy, the Democrats just want more money for their left-wing political constituents. It’s business as usual for the Democrats, of course, but a bigger question is will the media let them get away with it?

— JJk
7:10 pm September 26th, 2008